| Literature DB >> 34198319 |
Philip Moons1,2,3,4, Ewa-Lena Bratt2,5,6, Julie De Backer7,8,9, Eva Goossens1,4,6,8,10, Tim Hornung11,12, Oktay Tutarel9,13,14, Liesl Zühlke3,15,16,17, John Jairo Araujo18,19, Edward Callus20,21,22, Harald Gabriel9,23, Nauman Shahid24, Karen Sliwa25,26,27, Amy Verstappen24, Hsiao-Ling Yang28,29, Corina Thomet1,4,30,31.
Abstract
The vast majority of children with congenital heart disease (CHD) in high-income countries survive into adulthood. Further, paediatric cardiac services have expanded in middle-income countries. Both evolutions have resulted in an increasing number of CHD survivors. Expert care across the life span is necessitated. In adolescence, patients transition from being a dependent child to an independent adult. They are also advised to transfer from paediatrics to adult care. There is no universal consensus regarding how transitional care should be provided and how the transfer should be organized. This is even more challenging in countries with low resources. This consensus document describes issues and practices of transition and transfer of adolescents with CHD, accounting for different possibilities in high-, middle-, and low-income countries. Transitional care ought to be provided to all adolescents with CHD, taking into consideration the available resources. When reaching adulthood, patients ought to be transferred to adult care facilities/providers capable of managing their needs, and systems have to be in place to make sure that continuity of high-quality care is ensured after leaving paediatric cardiology.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescence; Continuity of care; Emerging adulthood; Heart defect, congenital; Transfer; Transition
Year: 2021 PMID: 34198319 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab388
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J ISSN: 0195-668X Impact factor: 29.983