Literature DB >> 34197772

Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Onyema Ogbuagu1, Peter J Ruane2, Daniel Podzamczer3, Laura C Salazar4, Keith Henry5, David M Asmuth6, David Wohl7, Richard Gilson8, Yongwu Shao9, Ramin Ebrahimi9, Stephanie Cox9, Alexander Kintu9, Christoph Carter9, Moupali Das9, Jared M Baeten9, Diana M Brainard9, Gary Whitlock10, Jason M Brunetta11, Gitte Kronborg12, Christoph D Spinner13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In DISCOVER, a multinational, randomised controlled trial, emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide compared with emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate showed non-inferior efficacy for HIV prevention and improved bone mineral density and renal safety biomarkers at week 48. We report outcomes analysed after all participants had completed 96 weeks of follow-up.
METHODS: This study is an ongoing, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done at 94 community, public health, and hospital-associated clinics located in Europe and North America. Adult cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men, both with a high risk of acquiring HIV as determined by self-reported sexual behaviour or recent sexually transmitted infections, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (200/25 mg) tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide group), or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (200/300 mg) tablets daily, with matched placebo tablets (emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate group). The primary efficacy outcome was incident HIV infection. Incidence of HIV-1 infection per 100 person-years was assessed when the last participant had completed 96 weeks of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02842086.
FINDINGS: Between Sept 13, 2016, and June 30, 2017, 5387 participants were randomly assigned to receive emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (n=2694) or emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (n=2693), contributing 10 081 person-years of follow-up. At 96 weeks of follow-up, there were eight HIV infections in participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (0·16 infections per 100 person-years [95% CI 0·07-0·31]) and 15 in participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (0·30 infections per 100 person-years [0·17-0·49]). Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide maintained its non-inferiority to emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV prevention (IRR 0·54 [95% CI 0·23-1·26]). Approximately 78-82% of participants reported taking study medication more than 95% of the time across all study visits. Rates of sexually transmitted infections remained high and similar across groups (21 cases per 100 person-years for rectal gonorrhoea and 28 cases per 100 person-years for rectal chlamydia). Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide continued to show superiority over emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in all but one of the six prespecified bone mineral density and renal biomarkers. There was more weight gain among participants who had received emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide (median weight gain 1·7 kg vs 0·5 kg, p<0·0001).
INTERPRETATION: Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide is safe and effective for longer-term pre-exposure prophylaxis in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34197772     DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00071-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet HIV        ISSN: 2352-3018            Impact factor:   12.767


  9 in total

1.  New onset kidney impairment in a large pre-exposure prophylaxis demonstration project in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Gregory M Lucas; Dean L Winslow
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 2.  How could HIV-1 drug resistance impact preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention?

Authors:  Urvi M Parikh; John W Mellors
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.061

3.  Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV in Primary Care and Beyond.

Authors:  Theresa Drallmeier; Ashley Meyr
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2022 May-Jun

4.  Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness, safety, adherence and risk compensation in all populations.

Authors:  Eamon O Murchu; Liam Marshall; Conor Teljeur; Patricia Harrington; Catherine Hayes; Patrick Moran; Mairin Ryan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Proactive strategies to optimize engagement of Black, Hispanic/Latinx, transgender, and nonbinary individuals in a trial of a novel agent for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

Authors:  Michelle Cespedes; Moupali Das; J Carlo Hojilla; Jill Blumenthal; Karam Mounzer; Moti Ramgopal; Theo Hodge; Thiago S Torres; Charles Peterson; Senzokuhle Shibase; Ayana Elliott; A C Demidont; Larkin Callaghan; C Chauncey Watson; Christoph Carter; Alex Kintu; Jared M Baeten; Onyema Ogbuagu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  Osteoporosis and HIV Infection.

Authors:  Emmanuel Biver
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Pre-Clinical Evaluation of Tenofovir and Tenofovir Alafenamide for HIV-1 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Foreskin Tissue.

Authors:  Laura Else; Sujan D Penchala; Azure-Dee Pillay; Thabiso B Seiphetlo; Limakatso Lebina; Christian Callebaut; Suks Minhas; Roland Morley; Tina Rashid; Neil Martinson; Julie Fox; Saye Khoo; Carolina Herrera
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 8.  Clinical Considerations in the Selection of Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in Canada.

Authors:  David C Knox; Robert Pilarski; Harvinder S Dhunna; Amit Kaushal; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.585

9.  Investigating the Contribution of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes in Drug-Drug Interactions of Dapivirine and Miconazole.

Authors:  Guru Raghavendra Valicherla; Phillip Graebing; Junmei Zhang; Ruohui Zheng; Jeremy Nuttall; Peter Silvera; Lisa Cencia Rohan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 6.321

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.