Literature DB >> 34197274

Impact of sampling and storage stress on the recovery of airborne SARS-CoV-2 virus surrogate captured by filtration.

Nirmala T Myers1, Taewon T Han1, Mei-Ling Li2, Gary Brewer2, Martin Harper3,4, Gediminas Mainelis1.   

Abstract

Environmental air sampling of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in occupational and community settings is pertinent to reduce and monitor the spread of the COVID pandemic. However, there is a general lack of standardized procedures for airborne virus sampling and limited knowledge of how sampling and storage stress impact the recovery of captured airborne viruses. Since filtration is one of the commonly used methods to capture airborne viruses, this study analyzed the effect of sampling and storage stress on SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus (human coronavirus OC43, or HCoV-OC43) captured by filters. HCoV-OC43, a simulant of the SARS-CoV-2, was aerosolized and captured by PTFE-laminated filters. The impact of sampling stress was evaluated by comparing the RNA yields recovered when sampled at 3 L/min and 10 L/min and for 10 min and 60 min; in one set of experiments, additional stress was added by passing clean air through filters with the virus for 1, 5, and 15 hr. The impact of storage stress was designed to examine RNA recovery from filters at room temperature (25 °C) and refrigerated conditions (4 °C) for up to 1 week of storage. To our knowledge, this is the first report on using HCoV-OC43 aerosol in air sampling experiments, and the mode diameter of the virus aerosolized from the growth medium was 40-60 nm as determined by SMPS + CPC system (TSI Inc.) and MiniWRAS (Grimm Inc.) measurements. No significant difference was found in virus recovery between the two sampling flow rates and different sampling times (p > 0.05). However, storage at room temperature (25 °C) yielded ∼2x less RNA than immediate processing and storage at refrigerated conditions (4 °C). Therefore, it is recommended to store filter samples with viruses at 4 °C up to 1 week if the immediate analysis is not feasible. Although the laminated PTFE filter used in this work purposefully does not include a non-PTFE backing, the general recommendations for handling and storing filter samples with viral particles are likely to apply to other filter types.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Airborne virus sampling; SARS-CoV-2 virus surrogate; filtration; human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43); sampling stress; storage stress

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34197274      PMCID: PMC9563239          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2021.1948047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   3.359


  45 in total

1.  Detection of airborne rhinovirus and its relation to outdoor air supply in office environments.

Authors:  Theodore A Myatt; Sebastian L Johnston; Zhengfa Zuo; Matthew Wand; Tatiana Kebadze; Stephen Rudnick; Donald K Milton
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  NanoDrop microvolume quantitation of nucleic acids.

Authors:  Philippe Desjardins; Deborah Conklin
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Kimberly A Prather; Linsey C Marr; Robert T Schooley; Melissa A McDiarmid; Mary E Wilson; Donald K Milton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Complete genomic sequence of human coronavirus OC43: molecular clock analysis suggests a relatively recent zoonotic coronavirus transmission event.

Authors:  Leen Vijgen; Els Keyaerts; Elien Moës; Inge Thoelen; Elke Wollants; Philippe Lemey; Anne-Mieke Vandamme; Marc Van Ranst
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  The effect of filter material on bioaerosol collection of Bacillus subtilis spores used as a Bacillus anthracis simulant.

Authors:  Nancy Clark Burton; Atin Adhikari; Sergey A Grinshpun; Richard Hornung; Tiina Reponen
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2005-04-14

6.  Measuring influenza RNA quantity after prolonged storage or multiple freeze/thaw cycles.

Authors:  Andrea Granados; Astrid Petrich; Allison McGeer; Jonathan B Gubbay
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 2.014

7.  Aerosol and Surface Distribution of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Hospital Wards, Wuhan, China, 2020.

Authors:  Zhen-Dong Guo; Zhong-Yi Wang; Shou-Feng Zhang; Xiao Li; Lin Li; Chao Li; Yan Cui; Rui-Bin Fu; Yun-Zhu Dong; Xiang-Yang Chi; Meng-Yao Zhang; Kun Liu; Cheng Cao; Bin Liu; Ke Zhang; Yu-Wei Gao; Bing Lu; Wei Chen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 8.  Collection, particle sizing and detection of airborne viruses.

Authors:  M Pan; J A Lednicky; C-Y Wu
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Detection of air and surface contamination by SARS-CoV-2 in hospital rooms of infected patients.

Authors:  Po Ying Chia; Kristen Kelli Coleman; Yian Kim Tan; Sean Wei Xiang Ong; Marcus Gum; Sok Kiang Lau; Xiao Fang Lim; Ai Sim Lim; Stephanie Sutjipto; Pei Hua Lee; Than The Son; Barnaby Edward Young; Donald K Milton; Gregory C Gray; Stephan Schuster; Timothy Barkham; Partha Pratim De; Shawn Vasoo; Monica Chan; Brenda Sze Peng Ang; Boon Huan Tan; Yee-Sin Leo; Oon-Tek Ng; Michelle Su Yen Wong; Kalisvar Marimuthu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the air of public places and transportation.

Authors:  Mostafa Hadei; Seyed Reza Mohebbi; Philip K Hopke; Abbas Shahsavani; Shahriyar Bazzazpour; Mohammadreza Alipour; Ahmad Jonidi Jafari; Anooshiravan Mohseni Bandpey; Alireza Zali; Maryam Yarahmadi; Mohsen Farhadi; Masoumeh Rahmatinia; Vajihe Hasanzadeh; Seyed Saeed Hashemi Nazari; Hamid Asadzadeh-Aghdaei; Mohammad Tanhaei; Mohammad Reza Zali; Majid Kermani; Mohmmad Hossien Vaziri; Hamid Chobineh
Journal:  Atmos Pollut Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 4.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.