Literature DB >> 34196817

Efficacy and safety of non-insulated fractional microneedle radiofrequency for treating difficult-to-treat rosacea: a 48-week, prospective, observational study.

Ben Wang1,2,3, Yu-Xuan Deng1, Pei-Yao Li1, Sha Yan1,2,3, Hong-Fu Xie1,2,3, Ji Li1,2,3, Dan Jian4,5,6.   

Abstract

Rosacea is a common chronic facial inflammatory skin disease. However, treatment for "difficult-to-treat rosacea" cases has not been established. This 48-week, prospective, observational study analyzed patients who underwent three non-insulated fractional microneedle radiofrequency (NFMRF) sessions at 2-month intervals. Therapy efficacy, epidermal barrier function, and side effects were evaluated. 34 subjects completed the trial. NFMRF resulted in CEA score reduction from 2.65 ± 0.59 to 1.56 ± 0.50 (P < 0.001) and mean DLQI reduction from 16.70 ± 3.55 to 10.48 ± 2.92 (P < 0.001). The successes of CEA (44.12 vs. 2.94%), IGA (91.67 vs. 25.00%), and flushing (58.82 vs. 26.47%) were observed. Among 34 patients, 22 reported "excellent" or "good" improvement and 30 were "very" or "relatively" satisfied. Skin barrier results revealed that hemoglobin content significantly decreased from 376.47 ± 71.29 at visit 0 to 161.32 ± 52.86 at visit 3. 2 of 30 patients followed-up at 6 months had a relapse at 18 and 20 weeks, respectively. No serious side effects were observed. NFMRF alone results in visible improvement and has great efficacy for difficult-to-treat rosacea without compromising patient safety or damaging the skin barrier.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Difficult-to-treat rosacea; Epidermal barrier function; NFMRF; Non-insulated fractional microneedle; Radiofrequency; Rosacea

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34196817     DOI: 10.1007/s00403-021-02259-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res        ISSN: 0340-3696            Impact factor:   3.033


  3 in total

Review 1.  Risk of systemic toxicity with topical lidocaine/prilocaine: a review.

Authors:  Anh N Tran; John Y Koo
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.114

2.  Incidence and prevalence of rosacea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Gether; L K Overgaard; A Egeberg; J P Thyssen
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Recommendations for rosacea diagnosis, classification and management: update from the global ROSacea COnsensus 2019 panel.

Authors:  M Schaller; L M C Almeida; A Bewley; B Cribier; J Del Rosso; N C Dlova; R L Gallo; R D Granstein; G Kautz; M J Mannis; G Micali; H H Oon; M Rajagopalan; M Steinhoff; E Tanghetti; D Thiboutot; P Troielli; G Webster; M Zierhut; E J van Zuuren; J Tan
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 9.302

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.