Literature DB >> 34196729

Artificial intelligence reporting guidelines: what the pediatric radiologist needs to know.

Riwa Meshaka1,2,3, Daniel Pinto Dos Santos4, Owen J Arthurs1,2,3, Neil J Sebire2,3,5, Susan C Shelmerdine6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

There has been an exponential rise in artificial intelligence (AI) research in imaging in recent years. While the dissemination of study data that has the potential to improve clinical practice is welcomed, the level of detail included in early AI research reporting has been highly variable and inconsistent, particularly when compared to more traditional clinical research. However, inclusion checklists are now commonly available and accessible to those writing or reviewing clinical research papers. AI-specific reporting guidelines also exist and include distinct requirements, but these can be daunting for radiologists new to the field. Given that pediatric radiology is a specialty faced with workforce shortages and an ever-increasing workload, AI could help by offering solutions to time-consuming tasks, thereby improving workflow efficiency and democratizing access to specialist opinion. As a result, pediatric radiologists are expected to be increasingly leading and contributing to AI imaging research, and researchers and clinicians alike should feel confident that the findings reported are presented in a transparent way, with sufficient detail to understand how they apply to wider clinical practice. In this review, we describe two of the most clinically relevant and available reporting guidelines to help increase awareness and engage the pediatric radiologist in conducting AI imaging research. This guide should also be useful for those reading and reviewing AI imaging research and as a checklist with examples of what to expect.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Children; Diagnostic accuracy; Machine learning; Pediatric radiology; Reporting guidelines

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34196729     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05129-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  1 in total

1.  Deep Learning for Pediatric Posterior Fossa Tumor Detection and Classification: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  J L Quon; W Bala; L C Chen; J Wright; L H Kim; M Han; K Shpanskaya; E H Lee; E Tong; M Iv; J Seekins; M P Lungren; K R M Braun; T Y Poussaint; S Laughlin; M D Taylor; R M Lober; H Vogel; P G Fisher; G A Grant; V Ramaswamy; N A Vitanza; C Y Ho; M S B Edwards; S H Cheshier; K W Yeom
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.966

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Prediction of shunt failure facilitated by rapid and accurate volumetric analysis: a single institution's preliminary experience.

Authors:  Tushar R Jha; Mark F Quigley; Khashayar Mozaffari; Orgest Lathia; Katherine Hofmann; John S Myseros; Chima Oluigbo; Robert F Keating
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 1.532

2.  European Society of Paediatric Radiology Artificial Intelligence taskforce: a new taskforce for the digital age.

Authors:  Lene Bjerke Laborie; Jaishree Naidoo; Erika Pace; Pierluigi Ciet; Christine Eade; Matthias W Wagner; Thierry A G M Huisman; Susan C Shelmerdine
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Artificial intelligence for radiological paediatric fracture assessment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susan C Shelmerdine; Richard D White; Hantao Liu; Owen J Arthurs; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-06-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.