| Literature DB >> 34196655 |
Francesco Testa1, Andrea Sodi2, Sabrina Signorini3, Valentina Di Iorio1, Vittoria Murro2, Raffaella Brunetti-Pierri1, Enza Maria Valente4,5, Marianthi Karali1,6, Paolo Melillo1, Sandro Banfi6,7, Francesca Simonelli1.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to perform a detailed longitudinal phenotyping and genetic characterization of 32 Italian patients with a nonsyndromic retinal dystrophy and mutations in the CEP290 gene.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34196655 PMCID: PMC8267213 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.62.9.1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ISSN: 0146-0404 Impact factor: 4.799
Clinical Findings in the Patients With Mutations in the CEP290 Gene
| Parameters | Study Cohort ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 19.0 ± 3.4 | |
| Age at diagnosis (y) | 4.2 ± 1.6 | |
| Hyperopia ( | 12 (52.1%) | |
| Myopia ( | 7 (30.4%) | |
|
|
|
|
| BCVA (logMAR) | 1.73 ± 0.20 | 1.65 ± 0.20 |
| CRT (µm) ( | 199.7 ± 16.7 | 203.3 ± 17.4 |
| EZ-band width (µm) ( | 1915.4 ± 569.5 | 1974.3 ± 557.7 |
|
|
| |
| Undetectable scotopic and photopic ERG | 16 (64.0%) | |
| Undetectable scotopic with detectable photopic ERG | 5 (20.6) | |
| Detectable scotopic and photopic ERG | 4 (16.0%) | |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean or counts (frequency).
Figure 1.Comparison of BCVA measurement between both eyes measured at the baseline visits (a). The blue lines represent the limit of the test–retest variability of 3 lines (0.3 logMAR), which corresponds to 15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters. BCVA measurements of the best-seeing eye in dependence of age (b). The values are colored according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for blindness (BCVA < 20/400; red), severe or moderate visual impairment (20/60 < BCVA ≤ 20/400; yellow), mild or no visual impairment (BCVA ≥ 20/60; green).
Figure 2.OCT measurements in dependence of age: CRT (a) and EZ band width (b). Linear and exponential models of progression with age are represented by continuous line and dotted line, respectively.
Figure 3.Example of a patient with reduced scotopic and photopic ERG, associated with diagnosis of RP, no nystagmus, pigment deposits visible at the color fundus image (a), a more preserved EZ band detectable by SD-OCT (b); and of a patient with undetectable photopic and scotopic ERG, associated with a diagnosis of LCA, nystagmus, RPE dystrophy shown by the color fundus image (c), associated with a less preserved EZ band as evaluable by SD-OCT (d).
CEP290 Variants Identified in the Study Cohort
| Nucleotide Change | Protein Change | Reference | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family | Patient ID | Variant 1 | Variant 2 | Variant 1 | Variant 2 | Var. 1 | Var. 2 |
| F1 | 8 | c.1298A>G | c.2252G>A | p.(Asp433Gly) | p.(Arg751Gln) |
|
|
| F2 | 6, 7 | c.1466T>C | c.1666del | p.(Leu489Pro) | p.(Ile556Phefs*17) |
|
|
| F3 | 2 | c.1664A>T | c.7394_7395del | p.(Lys555Ile) | p.(Glu2465Valfs*2) |
|
|
| F4 | 3 | c.6401T>C | c.1666del | p.(Ile2134Thr) | p.(Ile556Phefs*17) |
|
|
| F5 | 1 | c.180+1G>T | c.7031_7034del | p.(?) | p.(Leu2344Hisfs*2) |
|
|
| F6 | 4 | c.2723G>A | c.5493del | p.(Arg908Gln) | p.(Ala1832Profs*19) |
|
|
| F7 | 5 | c.2991+1655A>G | c.1666del | p.Cys998* | p.(Ile556Phefs*17) |
|
|
| F8 | 11 | c.2991+1655A>G | c.1666del | p.Cys998* | p.(Ile556Phefs*17) |
|
|
| F9 | 26 | c.2991+1655A>G | c.5041_5046delAT | p.Cys998* | p.(Val1680fs*1683) |
|
|
| F10 | 29 | c.2991+1655A>G | c.1860_1863delAAGA | p.Cys998* | p.(Arg621Ilefs*2) |
|
|
| F11 | 30 | c.2991+1655A>G | c.3292G>T | p.Cys998* | p.(Glu1098*) |
|
|
| F12 | 33 | c.2991+1655A>G | c.180+1G>A | p.Cys998* | p.(?) |
|
|
| F13 | 21 | c.2991+1655A>G | c.2991+1655A>G | p.Cys998* | p.Cys998* |
|
|
| F14 | 24 | c.2991+1655A>G | c.5813_5817del | p.Cys998* | p.(Thr1938Asnfs*15) |
|
|
| F15 | 27 | c.2991+1655A>G | c.1219_1220del | p.Cys998* | p.(Met407Glufs*13) |
|
|
| F16 | 28 | c.2991+1655A>G | c.566C>G | p.Cys998* | p.(Ser189*) |
|
|
| F17 | 17 | c.2991+1665A>G | c.1593C>A | p.Cys998* | p.(Tyr531*) |
|
|
| F18 | 22, 23 | c.2991+1665A>G | c.2991+1665A>G | p.Cys998* | p.Cys998* |
|
|
| F19 | 25 | c.2991+1665A>G | c.934G>T | p.Cys998* | p.(Glu312*) |
|
|
| F20 | 13 | c.3012delA | c.4732G>T | p.(Lys1004fs) | p.(Glu1578*) |
|
|
| F21 | 32 | c.4705-1G>T | c.3811C>T | p.(?) | p.(Arg1271*) |
|
|
| F22 | 18 | c.4962_4963del | c.6604del | p.(Glu1656Asnfs*3) | p.(Ile2202Leufs*24) |
|
|
| F23 | 12 | c.5709+2T>G | c.384_385del | p.(?) | p.(Asp128fs) |
|
|
| F24 | 9 | c.5813_5817del | c.6916A>T | p.(Thr1938Asnfs*15) | p.(Arg2306*) |
|
|
| F25 | 10 | c.6604del | c.6836T>A | p.(Ile2202Leufs*24) | p.(Leu2279*) |
|
|
| F26 | 14, 15 | c.6916A>T | c.1987A>T | p.(Arg2306*) | p.(Lys663*) |
|
|
| F27 | 31 | c.7341_7344dupACTT | c.1189+1G>A | p.(Ser2449Thrfs*7) | p.(?) |
|
|
| F28 | 34 | c.1187_1188del | c.7341_7344dupACTT | p.(Lys396Argfs*25) | p.(Ser2449Thrfs*7) |
|
|
| F29 | 20 | c.1219_1220del | c.4661_4663del | p.(Met407Glufs*13) | p.(Glu1554del) |
|
|
Variant reported for the first time in this study.
Clinical Features of Patients Stratified According to the CEP290 Variants
| Parameters | Group A | Group B | Group C |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 25.7 ± 6.2 | 16.7± 7.3 | 17.7 ± 7.5 | 0.629 | |||||
| Age at diagnosis (y) | 14.3 ± 7.1 | 7.4 ± 3.2 | 2.1 ± 0.9 | 0.083 | |||||
| Undetect. scotopic and photopic ERG | 2/6 (33.3%) | 3/ 4 (75.0%) | 7/8 (87.5%) | ||||||
| Undetect. scotopic with detect. photopic ERG | 2/6 (33.3%) | 1/4 (25.0%) | 1/8 (12.5%) | 0.181 | |||||
| Detect. scotopic and photopic ERG | 2/6 (33.3%) | 0/4 (0%) | 0/8 (0%) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BCVA (logMAR) | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 0.730 | <0.001 | 0.012 |
| CRT (µm) | 202 ± 46 | 195 ± 48 | 206 ± 21 | 209 ± 18 | 161 ± 28 | 150 ± 41 | 0.837 | 0.337 | 0.076 |
| EZ-band width (µm) | 783 ± 416 | 894 ± 429 | 1466 ± 120 | 1487 ± 152 | 1341 | 1411 | 0.101 | 0.606 | 0.918 |
Group A: an LoF and a nontruncating variant; group B: two LoF variants; Group C: an LoF and the deep intronic variant c.2991+1655A>G.
Undetect.: undetectable; detect.: detectable.
Figure 4.Comparison of BCVA measurements (best-seeing eye) in patients stratified according to the genotype. Patients harboring an LoF and the deep intronic variant c.2991+1655A>G (group C) had a significantly worse BCVA compared to the other groups.