| Literature DB >> 34196370 |
Hannah M Edwards1, Massimo Cogliati2, Geoffrey Kwenda3, Matthew C Fisher1.
Abstract
Our understanding of the pathogenic yeasts Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii has been greatly enhanced by use of genome sequencing technologies. Found ubiquitously as saprotrophs in the environment, inhalation of infectious spores from these pathogens can lead to the disease cryptococcosis. Individuals with compromised immune systems are at particular risk, most notably those living with HIV/AIDS. Genome sequencing in combination with laboratory and clinical studies has revealed diverse lineages with important differences in their observed frequency, virulence and clinical outcomes. However, to date, genomic analyses have focused primarily on clinical isolates that represent only a subset of the diversity in the environment. Enhanced genomic surveillance of these yeasts in their native environments is needed in order to understand their ecology, biology and evolution and how these influence the epidemiology and pathophysiology of clinical disease. This is particularly relevant on the African continent from where global cryptococcal diversity may have originated, yet where environmental sampling and sequencing has been sparse despite harbouring the largest population at risk from cryptococcosis. Here, we review what scientifically and clinically relevant insights have been provided by analysis of environmental Cryptococcus isolates to date and argue that with further sampling, particularly in Africa, many more important discoveries await.Entities:
Keywords: ecology; epidemiology; evolutionary biology; fungi; genomics; microbiology
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34196370 PMCID: PMC8536938 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiab093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol ISSN: 0168-6496 Impact factor: 4.519
Figure 1.Reported isolations of C. neoformans and C. gattii across each continental region up to Cogliati's 2013 review. Pie charts show distribution of clinical and environmental/veterinary sources of isolation. Bar chart shows total number of isolates reported with shaded regions as the number that were examined for molecular type. Despite data being from 2013, general patterns and proportions remain true.
Figure 2.Clinical, environmental and veterinary isolations (published) of C. neoformans and C. gattii by country and region across Africa.
Environmental Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii isolations from countries in Africa.
| Country (total # isolates) | Region | Environmental source | # isolates recovered | Species, variety, serotype, molecular type (as reported) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libya (44) | Tripoli | Pigeon droppings | 32 |
| Ellabib |
| 1 |
| ||||
|
| 2 |
| |||
|
| 9 |
| |||
| Tunisia (5) | Sfax region |
| 1 |
| Mseddi |
|
| 2 |
| |||
| Almond tree ( | 2 |
| |||
| Egypt (145) | Tanta |
| 1 |
| Mahmoud |
| Qutur |
| 2 |
| ||
| Gharbia Governatorate | Avian droppings | 95 |
| ||
| Nile delta | Pigeon droppings | 30 |
| Refai | |
| Giza |
| 3 |
| Elhariri | |
| Cairo |
| 2 |
| ||
| Al-Sharqia |
| 5 |
| ||
| Elmenofia |
| 3 |
| ||
| Abulnomorous | Ground water | 3 |
| Elfadaly | |
| Shabramant | Ground water | 1 |
| ||
| Kenya (53) | Nairobi | Avian droppings | 23 |
| Kangogo |
| 5 |
| ||||
| Tree swabs | 5 |
| |||
| 7 |
| ||||
| Chicken cages | 5 |
| |||
| Garbage dumping | 6 |
| |||
| Soil | 2 |
| |||
| Djibouti (1) | Djibouti | Pigeon droppings | 2 |
| Pal 2015 |
| Cameroon (98) | West region | Pigeon droppings and bat guano | 57 |
| Dongmo |
| 41 |
| ||||
| Ivory Coast (12) | Adjamé | Pigeon droppings | 12 |
| Kassi |
| Nigeria (41) | Southeastern Nigeria | Pigeon droppings | 39 |
| Nweze |
| Jos | Pigeon droppings | 3 | |||
| Nnadi | |||||
| Democratic Republic of Congo (20) | Zaire | House dust | 1 |
| Boekhout |
| Wood | 1 |
| |||
| Wood | 1 |
| |||
| Kinshasa | House dust | 2 |
| Varma | |
| Kinshasa | House dust | 4 |
| Swinne | |
| House air | 2 |
| |||
| Chicken droppings | 2 |
| |||
| Pigeon droppings | 7 |
| |||
| Burundi (35) | Bujumbura | Environment | 15 |
| Varma |
| Bujumbura | Patient's house | 7 |
| Swinne | |
| Bujumbura | House dust | 13 |
| Swinne | |
| Zambia (32) | Zambesi and Miombo woodlands | Trees | 5 |
| Vanhove |
| 19 |
| ||||
| 31 |
| ||||
| Miombo woodlands | Hyrax midden | 4 |
| Farrer | |
| 1 |
| ||||
| Tree hole | 2 |
| |||
| Botswana (105) | Gaborone | Pigeon droppings | 3 |
| Litvintseva |
| Gaborone | Tree bark | 2 |
| ||
| Tuli block | Mopane tree | 15 |
| ||
| Tuki block | Mopane tree | 4 |
| ||
| Tuli block | Soil | 2 |
| ||
| Tuli block | Soil | 1 |
| ||
| Tuli block | Baobab | 2 |
| ||
| Francistown, Gaborone, and Maun | Trees and bird excreta | 5 |
| Chen | |
| 64 |
| ||||
| 5 |
| ||||
| 2 |
| ||||
| South Africa (29) | Durban | Pigeon droppings | 20 |
| Litvintseva |
| Johannesburg | Soil | 2 |
| ||
| Parys | Pigeon droppings | 3 |
| ||
| Zeerust | Eucalyptus tree | 2 |
| ||
| Zeerust | Soil | 2 |
|
Figure 3.Distribution of the main C. neoformans and C. gattii molecular types identified over different global regions, as reported in Cogliati 2013. Since this review additional molecular types have been identified, including VNB in Central and South America and VGV in Africa, however general distribution patterns remain true.
Sources of environmental and veterinary isolates of C. neoformansand C. gattii in each global region.
| Sources of environmental and veterinary isolates | ||
|---|---|---|
| Region |
|
|
| Oceania | Environmental: | Environmental: |
| Veterinary: cat, dog, horse, koala, ferret, | Veterinary: kiwi, cat, dog, horse, sheep, cow, koala, quokka, cockatoo, ferret, | |
| Asia | Environmental: Mostly from pigeon and other bird excreta, less frequently from trees including | Environmental: Trees including |
| Veterinary: cat, dog, bandicoot | Veterinary: koala | |
| Africa | Environmental: Pigeon and bird excreta, soil, house dust, trees including Eucalyptus camaldulensis, mopane, baobab | Environmental: Soil, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, almond tree |
| Veterinary: N/A | Veterinary: cheetah | |
| Europe | Environmental: Mostly from pigeon, bird and bat guano, and red fox faeces. Few from trees including | Environmental: mostly from trees including |
| Veterinary: cat, dog, magpie, striped grass mouse, degu. | Veterinary: ferret, goat | |
| Central and South America | Environmental: pigeon and bird excreta, soil, dust, contaminated dwellings, Eucalyptus tree, almond tree, kassod tree, pink shower tree, | Environmental: soil, dust, |
| Veterinary: insects, bull, sheep | Veterinary: cheetah, goat, psittacine birds | |
| North America | Environmental: Mainly from pigeon droppings, some from fruit and vegetables | Environmental: Soil, trees, air, water |
| Veterinary: ferret | Veterinary: dog, cat, horse, ferret, birds, alpaca, parrots | |
*information taken from Cogliati2013
Figure 4.Schematic representation of the relationships among biotic and abiotic components (coloured polygons) of the Cryptococcus ecosystem, and dynamic flow of the fungus through the different niches (solid lines). Cryptococcus can circulate in the environment through several vectors (wind, water, animals) and reach the main reservoirs (soil and plants). From its habitat in these reservoirs, Cryptococcus can produce and release aerosolised basidiospores which are able to colonize other niches or infect susceptible hosts.