| Literature DB >> 34195479 |
Heather Heitkotter1, Rachel E Linderman1, Jenna A Cava2, Erica N Woertz1, Rebecca R Mastey2, Phyllis Summerfelt2, Toco Y Chui3,4, Richard B Rosen3,4, Emily J Patterson5, Ajoy Vincent6, Joseph Carroll1,2, Berge A Minassian7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lafora disease is a genetic neurodegenerative metabolic disorder caused by insoluble polyglucosan aggregate accumulation throughout the central nervous system and body. The retina is an accessible neural tissue, which may offer alternative methods to assess neurological diseases quickly and noninvasively. In this way, noninvasive imaging may provide a means to characterize neurodegenerative disease, which enables earlier identification and diagnosis of disease and the ability to monitor disease progression. In this study, we sought to characterize the retina of individuals with Lafora disease using non-invasive retinal imaging.Entities:
Keywords: AOSLO; Lafora disease; Nummular reflectivity; OCT; OCTA; RNFL
Year: 2021 PMID: 34195479 PMCID: PMC8239732 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2021.101146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep ISSN: 2451-9936
Fig. 1Retinal imaging findings for Case 1. A) Foveal topography and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) macular thickness grids for the right (top) and left (bottom) eye acquired from Cirrus volumetric scans. This patient had overall retinal thinning in at least four regions of the ETDRS grid with overall retinal thickness at the bottom 5% of normal limits. Retinal thickness at 1 mm from the fovea in the right eye had three regions of the ETDRS grid at the bottom 1% of normal limits. B) Ganglion cell – inner plexiform layer (GCIPL, top) and outer nuclear layer + Henle fiber layer (ONL+, bottom) thickness measures across the macula, represented as a black dashed line, show retinal layer thickness measures within the lower limit of normal range (control average ± 2SD shown as black line with gray shading). At 1 and 2 mm from the fovea, however, GCIPL thickness was slightly below 2 standard deviations from the control mean. C) Cone density measures at 1° (left, 43,600 cones/mm2) and 2° (right, 36,800 cones/mm2) from the fovea were within range of a previously published normative dataset. D) Nummular reflectivity in the inner retina was found in the macula (left) at the level of the inner limiting membrane and peripherally (right) at the level of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL, scale bar = 50 μm).
Fig. 2Retinal imaging findings for Case 2. A) Foveal topography and ETDRS macular thickness grids for the right (top) and left (bottom) eye acquired from Cirrus volumetric scans. This patient had overall retinal thinning in seven regions of the ETDRS grids. For both eyes, retinal thickness 6 mm temporal to the fovea was in the bottom 1% of normal range. B) Cone density estimates at 1° (left, 32,800 cones/mm2) and 2° (right, 27,000 cones/mm2) from the fovea were within normal range when compared to a previously published dataset. C) Nummular reflectivity was observed peripherally within the inner retina at the level of the RNFL (scale bar = 50 μm).
Fig. 3Retinal imaging findings in Case 3. A) Foveal topography and ETDRS macular thickness grids for the right (top) and left (bottom) eye show normal retinal thickness acquired from Cirrus volumetric scans. The age of this patient was modified to 18 years old to obtain ETDRS measures compared to the Cirrus Normative database. B) GCIPL (top) and ONL+ (bottom) thickness measures across the macula, shown as a dashed black line, were within normal limits (control average ± 2SD shown as black line with gray shading). C) Cone density estimates at 1° (left, 50,600 cones/mm2) and 2° (right, 36,200 cones/mm2) from the fovea were within normal range when compared to a previously published dataset. D) Nummular reflectivity was found peripherally at the level of the RNFL (scale bar = 50 μm).
Fig. 4Retinal vasculature findings in Case 3. A) Foveal avascular zone metrics acquired through optical coherence tomography angiography for the right (top) and left (bottom) eye are shown (scale bar = 500 μm). The foveal avascular zone, outlined in blue, was within normative range from a previously published dataset. B) Standard deviation mapping of the mean capillary density surrounding the optic nerve head (ONH) of the right (top) and left (bottom) eye are shown. The ONH scans showed a slightly higher than average capillary density in both eyes but were still within normal range. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)