| Literature DB >> 34194829 |
Amal Souissi1, Mariem Ben Said1, Ikhlas Ben Ayed2,3, Ines Elloumi1, Amal Bouzid1, Mohamed Ali Mosrati1, Mehdi Hasnaoui4, Malek Belcadhi1, Nabil Idriss4, Hassen Kamoun2,3, Nourhene Gharbi2,3, Abdullah A Gibriel5, Abdelaziz Tlili6,7, Saber Masmoudi1.
Abstract
Introduction: Hearing impairment (HI) is characterized by complex genetic heterogeneity. The evolution of next generation sequencing, including targeted enrichment panels, has revolutionized HI diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: Diagnosis; Genetic heterogeneity; Hearing impairment; Next generation sequencing; Pathogenic variant
Year: 2021 PMID: 34194829 PMCID: PMC8240103 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.01.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
The coverage of target HI genes included in custom HaloPlex-HS panel.
| Target ID | Regions | Coverage | Target ID | Regions | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68 | 99.83% | 47 | 99.88% | ||
| 6 | 100.00% | 39 | 99.47% | ||
| 66 | 99.89% | 6 | 100.00% | ||
| 10 | 99.88% | 28 | 99.62% | ||
| 20 | 100.00% | 42 | 99.24% | ||
| 20 | 100.00% | 10 | 100.00% | ||
| 13 | 99.86% | 7 | 100.00% | ||
| 8 | 100.00% | 23 | 99.96% | ||
| 6 | 100.00% | 20 | 100.00% | ||
| 90 | 99.73% | 12 | 99.82% | ||
| 3 | 99.72% | 4 | 100.00% | ||
| 10 | 99.59% | 28 | 99.58% | ||
| 64 | 99.87% | 3 | 100.00% | ||
| 48 | 100.00% | 71 | 99.87% | ||
| 30 | 100.00% | 12 | 99.63% |
Potential pathogenic mutations identified in Tunisian families.
| ID | Variant | Transcript | cDNA Position | Effect | Previous reports of the mutation | AF In EXAC (Global) | dbsnp | AF In gnomAD (Global) | SIFT | Provean | Clinvar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM_006383 | c.310C > T | Stop_gained | 8.244e-06 | rs1054728914 | 3.98e-6 | D | – | NR | |||
| NM_004452 | c.884A > G | Non_synonymous | 2.537e-05 | rs780275423 | 9.02e-6 | T | De | NR | |||
| NM_001083885 | c.2423delG | Frame_shift Premature stop codon | Tunisia | – | – | – | – | – | NR | ||
| NM_194322 | c.169G > T | Stop_gained | Saudi Arabia | – | rs397515591 | 4e-6 | – | – | P | ||
| NM_016239.3 | c.6265 T > C | Non_synonymous | – | – | – | D | De | NR | |||
| NM_003059.2 | c.338G > A | Non_synonymous | Tunisia | 0.00005 | rs768484124 | 0.000121 | D | De | NR | ||
| NM_033109.5 | c.1424A > G | Non_synonymous | Morocco | – | rs397514599 | – | D | De | P | ||
| NM_144672.3 | c.1807G > T | Non_synonymous | Algeria | 4.947e-05 | rs775686301 | 3.98e-6 | D | N | VUS | ||
| NM_001297764 | c.360C > T | Stop_gained | – | – | – | – | – | NR | |||
| NM_000260.4 | c.1679A > G | Non_synonymous | – | – | – | D | De | NR | |||
| NM_000260.4 | c.470 + 1G > A | Splice donor variant | Tunisia | – | rs797044510 | 6.37e-5 | – | – | P | ||
| c.2283-1G > T | Splice acceptor variant | Algeria | – | rs397516295 | – | – | – | P |
D: Damaging, T: Tolerated, De: Deleterious, N: Neutral.
NR: Not Reported, P: Pathogenic, VUS: Variant with Uncertain significance.
AF: Allele frequency.
*Novel mutations globally.
Variants segregation and pathogenicity assessment according to the ACMG guidelines.
| Patient ID | Mutation | Segregation | Pathogenic criteria | Benin criteria | ACMG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very Strong (PVS1) | Strong | Moderate | Supporting | Strong | ||||
| Yes | PVS1 | – | PM2-PP1* | PP3 | – | Pathogenic | ||
| Yes | – | – | PM2-PP1* | PP3 | – | Likely Pathogenic | ||
| Yes | PVS1 | PP1** | PM2 | – | – | Pathogenic | ||
| Yes | PVS1 | PP1** | PM2 | PP3 | – | Pathogenic | ||
| yes | – | PP1** | PM1-PM2 | PP2-PP3 | – | Pathogenic | ||
| yes | – | PS3-PP1** | PP3 | – | Pathogenic | |||
| yes | – | PP1** | PM2 | PP3-PP5 | – | Pathogenic | ||
| No | – | – | PM2 | – | BS4 | Uncertain significance | ||
| No | – | – | PM2 | PP3 | BS4 | Uncertain significance | ||
| Yes | PVS1 | PP1** | PM2 | – | – | Pathogenic | ||
| yes | – | PP1** | PM1-PM2 | PP2-PP3 | – | Pathogenic | ||
| Yes | PVS1 | PP5*** | PM2 | PP1-PP3 | – | Pathogenic | ||
| yes | PVS1 | PP5*** | PM2 | PP1-PP3 | – | Pathogenic | ||
* PP1 Moderate: CIB2 and ESRRB (2 affected members).
** PP1 Strong: WHRN, OTOF and USH1C (3 affected members).
***PP5 using strength “Strong” because ClinVar classifies this variant as Pathogenic.
SS : Splice Site Variant.
Summary of all recruited patients’ information.
| Patient ID | Pedigree ID | Consanguineous Relations | Pathogenic Variant | Age | Gender | Affected Members | Segregation Analysis | Ophthalmological investigation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P.1 | Family 1 | First Cousins | 24 | Male | 2 | + | OFE | Data not shown | No signs in favor of RP | |
| P.2 | Family 2 | First Cousins | 22 | Male | 2 | + | OFE | Data not shown | No signs in favor of RP | |
| P.3 | Family 3 | First Cousins | 34 | Male | 3 | + | OFE | Data not shown | No signs in favor of RP | |
| P.4 | Family 4 | First Cousins | 27 | Male | 3 | + | OFE | Data not shown | No signs in favor of RP | |
| P.5 | Family 5 | Third cousins | 19 | Female | 4 | + | OFE | Data not shown | No signs in favor of RP | |
| P.6 | Family 6 | Third cousins | 33 | Male | 3 | + | OFE | Data not shown | No signs in favor of RP | |
| P.7 | Family 7 | > Third cousins | 28 | Male | 5 | + | OFE | Data not shown | No signs in favor of RP | |
| P.8 | Family 8 | First Cousins | 30 | Female | 5 | OFE | Data not shown | No signs in favor of RP | ||
| P.9 | Data Not Shown | First Cousins | 22 | Female | 5 | OFE | Data not shown | No signs in favor of RP | ||
| P.10 | Family 10 | > Third Cousins | 32 | Female | 3 | + | OFE | Data not shown | Significant bilateral retinopathy | |
| P.11 | Family 11 | First Cousins | 40 | Male | 7 | + | OFE | Data not shown | Typical retinal degeneration | |
| P.12 | Family 12 | – | 3 | Female | 1 | + | OFE | Normal eyes fundi | ||
RP: Retinitis Pigmentosa / OCT: Optical Coherence Tomography.
RPE: Retinal Pigment Epithelium / ERG: Ganzfeld Electro-Retinogram.
OFE: Ocular fundus examination / IS / OS: Inner and Outer Segments.
Fig. 1ERG recordings in Family.10_P10 patient with retinitis pigmentosa. Severely reduced scotopic and photopic ERG flash responses with attenuated 30 Hz flicker in both eyes.
Fig. 2Ophthalmologic examinations of a 3-years-old patient with compound heterozygous SS-MYO7A (Family.12_P12). (A) Fundus photographs of both the left eye (LE) and the right eye (RE) are normal. (B) Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans showing alterations of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and of the boundary line between inner and outer segments (IS and OS) in the perimacular region. Lesions are indicated with arrows.
Fig. 3Plot in photopic and scotopic with ample flicker 30 Hz and normal latency. There are no signs in favor of retinitis pigmentosa in Family.3_P3.