Wai-Wang Chau 1 , Alec Lik-Hang Hung 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of AIS patients coming across both bracing and surgery have not yet reported. These patients received two major clinical interventions and their HRQOL might be different from previous articles. The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes of HRQOL of a specific group of AIS patients who experienced both bracing and surgery. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients requiring surgery with prior bracing treatment were identified from the electronic record. SRS-22 questionnaire was completed at 7 time points crossing both interventions (namely "Before", "Bracing ≤ 1 year", "Bracing > 1 year", "Pre-op", "Post-op", "Post-op ≤ 1 year, and "Post-op 1-2 years"). RESULTS: SRS-22 "Function", "Pain" and "Self-image" scores were decreased from "Before" to "Bracing ≤ 1 year" when started bracing and raised at "Bracing > 1 year". The 3 scores were dropped from "Bracing > 1 year" to "Pre-op", particularly on "Self-image". "Function" and "Pain" were significantly dropped from "Pre-op" to "Post-op" and kept raising until "Post-op 1-2 years". "Self-image" was improving after "Pre-op". "Mental" was relatively stable along the timeline. CONCLUSION: This study described the changes in HRQOL of a specific group of AIS patients. Scores were dropped after the two major clinical interventions and recovered afterwards. Medical professionals were able to plan and provide appropriate supports on the expected changes in HRQOL, especially on function, pain and mental. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of AIS patients coming across both bracing and surgery have not yet reported. These patients received two major clinical interventions and their HRQOL might be different from previous articles. The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes of HRQOL of a specific group of AIS patients who experienced both bracing and surgery. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients requiring surgery with prior bracing treatment were identified from the electronic record. SRS-22 questionnaire was completed at 7 time points crossing both interventions (namely "Before", "Bracing ≤ 1 year", "Bracing > 1 year", "Pre-op", "Post-op", "Post-op ≤ 1 year, and "Post-op 1-2 years"). RESULTS: SRS-22 "Function", "Pain" and "Self-image" scores were decreased from "Before" to "Bracing ≤ 1 year" when started bracing and raised at "Bracing > 1 year". The 3 scores were dropped from "Bracing > 1 year" to "Pre-op", particularly on "Self-image". "Function" and "Pain" were significantly dropped from "Pre-op" to "Post-op" and kept raising until "Post-op 1-2 years". "Self-image" was improving after "Pre-op". "Mental" was relatively stable along the timeline. CONCLUSION: This study described the changes in HRQOL of a specific group of AIS patients. Scores were dropped after the two major clinical interventions and recovered afterwards. Medical professionals were able to plan and provide appropriate supports on the expected changes in HRQOL, especially on function, pain and mental. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.
Entities: Chemical
Keywords:
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Bracing; Quality of life; Surgery
Year: 2021
PMID: 34194649 PMCID: PMC8192660 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00229-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251