| Literature DB >> 34194378 |
Victoria Leopardi1, Yu-Mei Chang2, Andrew Pham1, Jie Luo1, Oliver A Garden1.
Abstract
Background: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder of unknown etiology in most patients, in which autoantibodies target components of neuromuscular junctions and impair nerve to muscle transmission. Objective: To provide a synthesis of the evidence examining infectious agents associated with the onset of MG. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that microbes play a pathogenic role in the initiation of MG. For clinical cases, the onset of clinical signs is used as a proxy for the true onset of autoimmunity.Entities:
Keywords: autoimmunity; etiology; infection; myasthenia gravis; virus
Year: 2021 PMID: 34194378 PMCID: PMC8236805 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.618021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Curation of records. Papers captured by search algorithms in PubMed and Web of Science (n = 827) were manually curated to remove duplicates (n = 592). Papers were screened to assess whether they met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, yielding a total of 48 publications. An additional 6 papers were retrieved from the reference lists of relevant articles.
Figure 2Diagnostic algorithm for myasthenia gravis (MG). Having identified muscle weakness in a patient, biomarkers for myasthenia gravis should next be assessed. Detectible levels of antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) or the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) should be present for a firm diagnosis of MG. Seronegative patients demonstrating muscle weakness confirmed through repetitive nerve stimulation and/or single-fiber electromyography would yield a supportive diagnosis.
Figure 3Agreement of integrated metric of evidence (IME) values for ten randomized publications. Ten research papers from the pool of included records were randomly chosen and individually assessed by three reviewers, blind to each other's scores. The interclass correlation between IME values was 0.97, demonstrating excellent reliability of the scoring system. Horizontal dotted lines indicate the threshold IME values between negligible and low (2.79), low and intermediate (4.14), and intermediate and high (5.58) levels of evidence.
Figure 4Integrated metric of evidence (IME) values for infectious agents. Horizontal dotted lines indicate the threshold IME values between negligible and low (2.79), low and intermediate (4.14), and intermediate and high (5.58) levels of evidence. The median IME for the dataset is 2.63 (mean = 2.48; range −3.79–5.25).