Andreas Katsimpris1, Aristotelis Karamaounas2, Anna Maria Sideri2, John Katsimpris3, Ilias Georgalas2, Petros Petrou2. 1. First Ophthalmology Department, "G.Gennimatas" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. a.katsimpris@gna-gennimatas.gr. 2. First Ophthalmology Department, "G.Gennimatas" Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, General Hospital of Patras "Agios Andreas", Patras, Greece.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess the association between optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) retinal measurements and Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception up to October 28th, 2020 for studies assessing the association between OCTA retinal measurements and AD. Estimates from eligible studies were meta-analysed and pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) between AD patients and healthy participants with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated, using the Hartung-Knapp/Sidik-Jonkman random-effects method. In addition, we quantified the minimum strength on the risk ratio scale (E value) required for an unmeasured confounder to nullify these associations. RESULTS: Ten eligible studies for our systematic review were identified through our search strategy. The pooled SMD between the retinal vessel density of AD patients and healthy participants in the whole superficial vascular plexus (SVP), parafoveal SVP and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was -0.41 (95% CI: -0.69 to -0.13, p value = 0.01, I2 = 15%, seven studies), -0.51 (95% CI: -0.84 to -0.18, p value = 0.01, I2 = 40%, six studies), and 0.87 (95% CI: -0.03 to 1.76, p value = 0.05, I2 = 91%, seven studies), respectively. An unmeasured confounder would need to be associated with a 2.26-, 2.56- and 3.82-fold increase in the risk of AD and OCTA retinal measurements, in order for the pooled SMD estimate of vessel density in whole SVP, parafoveal SVP and FAZ, respectively, to be nullified. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, whole and parafoveal SVP vessel density were inversely associated with AD. However, prospective longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are needed to furtherly assess these associations.
BACKGROUND: To assess the association between optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) retinal measurements and Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception up to October 28th, 2020 for studies assessing the association between OCTA retinal measurements and AD. Estimates from eligible studies were meta-analysed and pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) between AD patients and healthy participants with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated, using the Hartung-Knapp/Sidik-Jonkman random-effects method. In addition, we quantified the minimum strength on the risk ratio scale (E value) required for an unmeasured confounder to nullify these associations. RESULTS: Ten eligible studies for our systematic review were identified through our search strategy. The pooled SMD between the retinal vessel density of AD patients and healthy participants in the whole superficial vascular plexus (SVP), parafoveal SVP and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was -0.41 (95% CI: -0.69 to -0.13, p value = 0.01, I2 = 15%, seven studies), -0.51 (95% CI: -0.84 to -0.18, p value = 0.01, I2 = 40%, six studies), and 0.87 (95% CI: -0.03 to 1.76, p value = 0.05, I2 = 91%, seven studies), respectively. An unmeasured confounder would need to be associated with a 2.26-, 2.56- and 3.82-fold increase in the risk of AD and OCTA retinal measurements, in order for the pooled SMD estimate of vessel density in whole SVP, parafoveal SVP and FAZ, respectively, to be nullified. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, whole and parafoveal SVP vessel density were inversely associated with AD. However, prospective longitudinal studies with larger sample sizes are needed to furtherly assess these associations.
Authors: Areti Angeliki Veroniki; Dan Jackson; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Ralf Bender; Jack Bowden; Guido Knapp; Oliver Kuss; Julian P T Higgins; Dean Langan; Georgia Salanti Journal: Res Synth Methods Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 5.273
Authors: Inés López-Cuenca; Elena Salobrar-García; Lidia Sánchez-Puebla; Eva Espejel; Lucía García Del Arco; Pilar Rojas; Lorena Elvira-Hurtado; José A Fernández-Albarral; Federico Ramírez-Toraño; Ana Barabash; Juan J Salazar; José M Ramírez; Rosa de Hoz; Ana I Ramírez Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-06 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Mays Al-Nofal; Irene de Boer; Seda Agirman; Anne E Wilms; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Gisela M Terwindt; Irene C Notting Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-08-26 Impact factor: 4.086