| Literature DB >> 34193911 |
Neeti Keswani1, Ricardo J C Lopes2, Yoshikata Nakajima3, Ranveer Singh4,5, Neha Chauhan3, Tapobrata Som4,6, D Sakthi Kumar3, Afranio R Pereira2, Pintu Das7.
Abstract
Magnetic analogue of an isolated free electric charge, i.e., a magnet with a single north or south pole, is a long sought-after particle which remains elusive so far. In magnetically frustrated pyrochlore solids, a classical analogue of monopole was observed as a result of excitation of spin ice vertices. Direct visualization of such excitations were proposed and later confirmed in analogous artificial spin ice (ASI) systems of square as well as Kagome geometries. However, such magnetically charged vertices are randomly created as they are thermally driven and are always associated with corresponding equal and opposite emergent charges, often termed as monopole-antimonopole pairs, connected by observable strings. Here, we demonstrate a controlled stabilisation of a robust isolated emergent monopole-like magnetically charged vertices in individual square ASI systems by application of an external magnetic field. The excitation conserves the magnetic charge without the involvement of a corresponding excitation of opposite charge. Well supported by Monte Carlo simulations our experimental results enable, in absence of a true elemental magnetic monopole, creation of electron vortices and studying electrodynamics in presence of a monopole-like field in a solid state environment.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34193911 PMCID: PMC8245615 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92877-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Topography images of ASI systems as well as schematics defining magnetic charges at border and central vertices. AFM images of square ASI vertices with closed edges resembling a stained glass window (a) and a deformed stained glass window (b). The stadium shaped nanomagnets are of dimensions nm and are magnetically in single domain state. In the deformed stained glass window, the misaligned nanomagnet is placed at 30 with respect to the long axis of the vertical nanomagnets. The applied magnetic field direction is at an angle of and with respect to the vertical nanomagnets for the window patterns (a,b), respectively. (c) shows the possible vertex configurations for vertex with nomenclatures of different types (type-I, type-II,...etc.) of spin ice vertices. Schematics of possible orientations of magnetization, magnetic charges in the nanomagnets under dumbbell model and net charges at edge vertices for (d) and corners (e).
Figure 2MFM images at discrete magnetic fields and the corresponding arrow diagrams for the two samples (Fig. 1a,b) and description of magnetic charges. (a,c,e,g) are MFM images of the stained glass window sample (Fig. 1a) at 250 mT, − 10 mT, − 42.5 mT and − 45 mT, respectively. (b,d,f,h) are corresponding arrow diagrams clarifying the orientation of the net magnetizations in the nanomagnets. The circles at the central vertex position in (f,o) indicate emergent monopole-like magnetic charge excitations. (i,k,m,q) are MFM images of the deformed stained glass window sample (Fig. 1b) at 250 mT, − 10 mT, − 35 mT and − 50 mT, respectively. (j,l,n–p,r), clarifies the orientations of magnetizations at the corresponding fields. The dotted stadium shapes in the MFM images indentify the actual shapes of the nanomagnets and the dotted (magenta) arrows in the arrow diagrams for both samples show the switched nanomagnets at the corresponding fields. (n–p) show the three switchings at the bias field of − 35 mT. (o,p) are tip-induced switchings (Fig. 2m) at tip scan line positions indicated by SW-I and SW-II while tip scanning in the downward direction. The charge distribution in units of in the monopole states for undeformed (s) and deformed stained glass window (t).
Figure 3Most probable, minimum energy magnetic configurations for the undeformed (black) and deformed (red) windows plotted against external field. Magnetic field is applied at an angle of 10 with respect to the easy axis of the vertical nanoislands for the former and 7 for the latter sample. Configurations a and b are the possible ground states for both samples. For undeformed samples, as the external field increases to near , configuration b still shows the most probable state. With further increase of field, configurations c, d (with a central monopole-like charge excitation) and e (type-II) are observed. The same behavior is observed for the deformed window sample.
Figure 4Magnetic field lines for stained glass (a) and deformed stain glass window (b) samples. (a) Shows the far-field image data. The inset exemplifies the zoomed near-field data. (b) Shows near field data of the deformed window. The length scales for both figures are in units of the lattice constant of the artificial lattice.