Literature DB >> 34193501

Coronavax: preparing community and government for COVID-19 vaccination: a research protocol for a mixed methods social research project.

Katie Attwell1,2, Samantha Carlson3,2, Jordan Tchilingirian3, Tauel Harper4, Lara McKenzie3, Leah Roberts3, Marco Rizzi5, Darren Westphal6, Paul Effler6,7, Catherine Hughes8, Valerie Swift2, Christopher C Blyth2,9.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ahead of the implementation of a COVID-19 vaccination programme, the interdisciplinary Coronavax research team developed a multicomponent mixed methods project to support successful roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccine in Western Australia. This project seeks to analyse community attitudes about COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine access and information needs. We also study how government incorporates research findings into the vaccination programme. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Coronavax protocol employs an analytical social media study, and a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with purposively selected community groups. Participant groups currently include healthcare workers, aged care workers, first responders, adults aged 65+ years, adults aged 30-64 years, young adults aged 18-29 years, education workers, parents/guardians of infants and young children (<5 years), parents/guardians of children aged 5-18 years with comorbidities and parents/guardians who are hesitant about routine childhood vaccines. The project also includes two studies that track how Australian state and Commonwealth (federal) governments use the study findings. These are functional dialogues (translation and discussion exercises that are recorded and analysed) and evidence mapping of networks within government (which track how study findings are used). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been granted by the Child and Adolescent Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) and the University of Western Australia HREC. Study findings will be disseminated by a series of journal articles, reports to funders and stakeholders, and invited and peer-reviewed presentations. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; health policy; infection control; public health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34193501     DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  4 in total

1.  COVID-19: talk of 'vaccine hesitancy' lets governments off the hook.

Authors:  Katie Attwell; Adam Hannah; Julie Leask
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  How Vaccination Rumours Spread Online: Tracing the Dissemination of Information Regarding Adverse Events of COVID-19 Vaccines.

Authors:  Tauel Harper; Katie Attwell
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  Western Australian health care workers' views on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for the workplace.

Authors:  Katie Attwell; Leah Roberts; Christopher C Blyth; Samantha J Carlson
Journal:  Health Policy Technol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  COVID-19 vaccine Mandates: An Australian attitudinal study.

Authors:  Katie Attwell; Marco Rizzi; Lara McKenzie; Samantha J Carlson; Leah Roberts; Sian Tomkinson; Chris Blyth
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.641

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.