Literature DB >> 34193215

A low-cost automated growth chamber system for continuous measurements of gas exchange at canopy scale in dynamic conditions.

Nicole Salvatori1,2, Alberti Giorgio3, Onno Muller4, Uwe Rascher4, Alessandro Peressotti3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obtaining instantaneous gas exchanges data is fundamental to gain information on photosynthesis. Leaf level data are reliable, but their scaling up to canopy scale is difficult as they are acquired in standard and/or controlled conditions, while natural environments are extremely dynamic. Responses to dynamic environmental conditions need to be considered, as measurements at steady state and their related models may overestimate total carbon (C) plant uptake.
RESULTS: In this paper, we describe an automatic, low-cost measuring system composed of 12 open chambers (60 × 60 × 150 cm; around 400 euros per chamber) able to measure instantaneous CO2 and H2O gas exchanges, as well as environmental parameters, at canopy level. We tested the system's performance by simulating different CO2 uptake and respiration levels using a tube filled with soda lime or pure CO2, respectively, and quantified its response time and measurement accuracy. We have been also able to evaluate the delayed response due to the dimension of the chambers, proposing a method to correct the data by taking into account the response time ([Formula: see text]) and the residence time (τ). Finally, we tested the system by growing a commercial soybean variety in fluctuating and non-fluctuating light, showing the system to be fast enough to capture fast dynamic conditions. At the end of the experiment, we compared cumulative fluxes with total plant dry biomass.
CONCLUSIONS: The system slightly over-estimated (+ 7.6%) the total C uptake, even though not significantly, confirming its ability in measuring the overall CO2 fluxes at canopy scale. Furthermore, the system resulted to be accurate and stable, allowing to estimate the response time and to determine steady state fluxes from unsteady state measured values. Thanks to the flexibility in the software and to the dimensions of the chambers, even if only tested in dynamic light conditions, the system is thought to be used for several applications and with different plant canopies by mimicking different environmental conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canopy; Dynamic photosynthesis; Fluctuating light; Growth chamber; Low-cost

Year:  2021        PMID: 34193215     DOI: 10.1186/s13007-021-00772-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Methods        ISSN: 1746-4811            Impact factor:   4.993


  27 in total

Review 1.  Models of photosynthesis.

Authors:  G D Farquhar; J A Berry
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Dynamic photosynthesis in different environmental conditions.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Alejandro Morales; Jeremy Harbinson; Johannes Kromdijk; Ep Heuvelink; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 3.  Modeling Stomatal Conductance.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rainforest species : II. Carbon gain and photosynthetic efficiency during lightflecks.

Authors:  Robin L Chazdon; Robert W Pearcy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Acclimation of photosynthesis to lightflecks in tomato leaves: interaction with progressive shading in a growing canopy.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Shizue Matsubara; Jeremy Harbinson; Ep Heuvelink; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.500

Review 6.  Fluctuating Light Takes Crop Photosynthesis on a Rollercoaster Ride.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Alejandro Morales; Jeremy Harbinson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  An experimental set-up to study carbon, water, and nitrate uptake rates by hydroponically grown plants.

Authors:  J L Andriolo; J Le Bot; C Gary; G Sappe; P Orlando; B Brunel; C Sarrouy
Journal:  J Plant Nutr       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.707

Review 8.  Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo.

Authors:  Neil R Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 26.379

9.  Getting back to nature: a reality check for experiments in controlled environments.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Annunziata; Federico Apelt; Petronia Carillo; Ursula Krause; Regina Feil; Virginie Mengin; Martin A Lauxmann; Karin Köhl; Zoran Nikoloski; Mark Stitt; John E Lunn; Christine Raines
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Maximum fluorescence and electron transport kinetics determined by light-induced fluorescence transients (LIFT) for photosynthesis phenotyping.

Authors:  Beat Keller; Imre Vass; Shizue Matsubara; Kenny Paul; Christoph Jedmowski; Roland Pieruschka; Ladislav Nedbal; Uwe Rascher; Onno Muller
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  2 in total

1.  A System Dynamics Approach to Model Photosynthesis at Leaf Level Under Fluctuating Light.

Authors:  Nicole Salvatori; Fabrizio Carteni; Francesco Giannino; Giorgio Alberti; Stefano Mazzoleni; Alessandro Peressotti
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  Does Fluctuating Light Affect Crop Yield? A Focus on the Dynamic Photosynthesis of Two Soybean Varieties.

Authors:  Nicole Salvatori; Giorgio Alberti; Onno Muller; Alessandro Peressotti
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.627

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.