Literature DB >> 34193134

Professionals' views on working in the field of domestic violence and abuse during the first wave of COVID-19: a qualitative study in the Netherlands.

Nicole E van Gelder1,2, Ditte L van Haalen3, Kyra Ekker3, Suzanne A Ligthart3, Sabine Oertelt-Prigione3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown evoked great worries among professionals in the field of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) as they expected a rise of the phenomenon. While many countries reported increased DVA, the Netherlands did not. To understand this discrepancy and the overall impact of the lockdown on DVA support services, we interviewed DVA professionals about their experiences with DVA during the rise of COVID-19, the impact of the lockdown on clients and working conditions, and views on eHealth and online tools.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 16 DVA professionals with various specializations. This data was analyzed using open thematic coding and content analysis.
RESULTS: Most professionals did not see an increase in DVA reports but they did notice more severe violence. They experienced less opportunities to detect DVA and worried about their clients' wellbeing and the quality of (online) care. Furthermore, their working conditions rapidly changed, with working from home and online, and they expressed frustration, insecurity and loneliness. Professionals feel eHealth and online tools are not always suitable but they do see them as an opportunity to increase reach and maintain services when physical contact is not possible.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests DVA was probably under-detected during the lockdown rather than not having increased. The Dutch system heavily relies on professionals to detect and report DVA, suggesting a need for critical evaluation of the accessibility of professional help. Professionals experienced significant challenges and should themselves be supported psychologically and in their changed work practices to maintain their ability to aid survivors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Child abuse; Coronavirus; Domestic violence and abuse; Intimate partner violence and abuse; Occupational health; Online; Pandemic; Working conditions; eHealth

Year:  2021        PMID: 34193134     DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06674-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  9 in total

1.  We've had training, now what? Qualitative analysis of barriers to domestic violence screening and referral in a health care setting.

Authors:  Debbie Minsky-Kelly; L Kevin Hamberger; Deborah A Pape; Marie Wolff
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2005-10

2.  Barriers to screening for domestic violence in the emergency department.

Authors:  Lisa Yonaka; Marian K Yoder; Janet B Darrow; John P Sherck
Journal:  J Contin Educ Nurs       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.224

3.  Telling their stories: primary care practitioners' experience evaluating and reporting injuries caused by child abuse.

Authors:  Emalee G Flaherty; Rise Jones; Robert Sege
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2004-09

4.  Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?

Authors:  Monique M Hennink; Bonnie N Kaiser; Vincent C Marconi
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2016-09-26

5.  How do public child healthcare professionals and primary school teachers identify and handle child abuse cases? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Manuela W A Schols; Corine de Ruiter; Ferko G Öry
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Family violence and COVID-19: Increased vulnerability and reduced options for support.

Authors:  Kim Usher; Navjot Bhullar; Joanne Durkin; Naomi Gyamfi; Debra Jackson
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.503

7.  SAFE: an eHealth intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, process evaluation and open feasibility study.

Authors:  N E van Gelder; K A W L van Rosmalen-Nooijens; S A Ligthart; J B Prins; S Oertelt-Prigione; A L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  The association between natural disasters and violence: A systematic review of the literature and a call for more epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Mohsen Rezaeian
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  COVID-19: Reducing the risk of infection might increase the risk of intimate partner violence.

Authors:  N van Gelder; A Peterman; A Potts; M O'Donnell; K Thompson; N Shah; S Oertelt-Prigione
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-04-11
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  "The real pandemic's been there forever": qualitative perspectives of domestic and family violence workforce in Australia during COVID-19.

Authors:  Rachel Baffsky; Kristen Beek; Sarah Wayland; Janani Shanthosh; Amanda Henry; Patricia Cullen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  "Are you safe to talk?": Perspectives of Service Providers on Experiences of Domestic Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jenny K Leigh; Lita Danielle Peña; Ashri Anurudran; Anant Pai
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2022-01-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.