William Martinez1, Amber J Hackstadt2, Gerald B Hickson3, Thomas Knoerl4, S Trent Rosenbloom5, Kenneth A Wallston6, Tom A Elasy1. 1. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medicine Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States. 3. Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States. 4. Upstate Medical University, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York, United States. 5. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States. 6. Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: My Diabetes Care (MDC) is a novel, multifaceted patient portal intervention designed to help patients better understand their diabetes health data and support self-management. MDC uses infographics to visualize and summarize patients' diabetes health data, incorporates motivational strategies, and provides literacy level-appropriate educational resources. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the usability, acceptability, perceptions, and potential impact of MDC. METHODS: We recruited 69 participants from four clinics affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Participants were given 1 month of access to MDC and completed pre- and post-questionnaires including validated measures of usability and patient activation, and questions about user experience. RESULTS: Sixty participants completed the study. Participants' mean age was 58, 55% were females, 68% were Caucasians, and 48% had limited health literacy (HL). Most participants (80%) visited MDC three or more times and 50% spent a total of ≥15 minutes on MDC. Participants' median System Usability Scale (SUS) score was 78.8 [Q1, Q3: 72.5, 87.5] and significantly greater than the threshold value of 68 indicative of "above average" usability (p < 0.001). The median SUS score of patients with limited HL was similar to those with adequate HL (77.5 [72.5, 85.0] vs. 82.5 [72.5, 92.5]; p = 0.41). Participants most commonly reported the literacy level-appropriate educational links and health data infographics as features that helped them better understand their diabetes health data (65%). All participants (100%) intended to continue to use MDC. Median Patient Activation Measure® scores increased postintervention (64.3 [55.6, 72.5] vs. 67.8 [60.6, 75.0]; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Participants, including those with limited HL, rated the usability of MDC above average, anticipated continued use, and identified key features that improved their understanding of diabetes health data. Patient activation improved over the study period. Our findings suggest MDC may be a beneficial addition to existing patient portals. Thieme. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: My Diabetes Care (MDC) is a novel, multifaceted patient portal intervention designed to help patients better understand their diabetes health data and support self-management. MDC uses infographics to visualize and summarize patients' diabetes health data, incorporates motivational strategies, and provides literacy level-appropriate educational resources. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the usability, acceptability, perceptions, and potential impact of MDC. METHODS: We recruited 69 participants from four clinics affiliated with Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Participants were given 1 month of access to MDC and completed pre- and post-questionnaires including validated measures of usability and patient activation, and questions about user experience. RESULTS: Sixty participants completed the study. Participants' mean age was 58, 55% were females, 68% were Caucasians, and 48% had limited health literacy (HL). Most participants (80%) visited MDC three or more times and 50% spent a total of ≥15 minutes on MDC. Participants' median System Usability Scale (SUS) score was 78.8 [Q1, Q3: 72.5, 87.5] and significantly greater than the threshold value of 68 indicative of "above average" usability (p < 0.001). The median SUS score of patients with limited HL was similar to those with adequate HL (77.5 [72.5, 85.0] vs. 82.5 [72.5, 92.5]; p = 0.41). Participants most commonly reported the literacy level-appropriate educational links and health data infographics as features that helped them better understand their diabetes health data (65%). All participants (100%) intended to continue to use MDC. Median Patient Activation Measure® scores increased postintervention (64.3 [55.6, 72.5] vs. 67.8 [60.6, 75.0]; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Participants, including those with limited HL, rated the usability of MDC above average, anticipated continued use, and identified key features that improved their understanding of diabetes health data. Patient activation improved over the study period. Our findings suggest MDC may be a beneficial addition to existing patient portals. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Authors: Anuj K Dalal; Patricia Dykes; Lipika Samal; Kelly McNally; Eli Mlaver; Cathy S Yoon; Stuart R Lipsitz; David W Bates Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Nicol Nijland; Julia E W C van Gemert-Pijnen; Saskia M Kelders; Bart J Brandenburg; Erwin R Seydel Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2011-09-30 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Lina Tieu; Urmimala Sarkar; Dean Schillinger; James D Ralston; Neda Ratanawongsa; Rena Pasick; Courtney R Lyles Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: William Martinez; Kenneth A Wallston; David G Schlundt; Gerald B Hickson; Kemberlee R Bonnet; Ricardo J Trochez; Tom A Elasy Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2018-05-21
Authors: Gennaro Di Tosto; Daniel M Walker; Cynthia J Sieck; Lorraine Wallace; Sarah R MacEwan; Megan E Gregory; Seth Scarborough; Timothy R Huerta; Ann Scheck McAlearney Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 2.762