Literature DB >> 34192728

Optimal Timing of Tracheostomy in Injured Adolescents.

Elissa K Butler1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Elizabeth Y Killien1,4, Jonathan I Groner5, Saman Arbabi1,2, Monica S Vavilala1,6, Frederick P Rivara1,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the optimal timing of tracheostomy for injured adolescents.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Trauma facilities in the United States. PATIENTS: Adolescents (age 12-17 yr) in the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2016) who were ventilated for greater than 24 hours and survived to discharge.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After stratifying by traumatic brain injury diagnosis, we compared ICU and hospital length of stay, pneumonia, and discharge disposition of patients with tracheostomy prior to three cut points (3, 7, and 14 d after admission) to 1) patients intubated at least as long as each cut point and 2) patients with tracheostomy on or after each cut point. Of 11,045 patients, 1,391 (12.6%) underwent tracheostomy. Median time to tracheostomy was 9 days (interquartile range, 6-13 d) for traumatic brain injury and 7 days (interquartile range, 3-12 d) for nontraumatic brain injury patients. Nontraumatic brain injury patients with tracheostomy prior to 7 days had 5.6 fewer ICU days (-7.8 to -3.5 d) and 5.7 fewer hospital days (-8.8 to -2.7 d) than patients intubated greater than or equal to 7 days and had 14.8 fewer ICU days (-19.6 to -10.0 d) and 15.3 fewer hospital days (-21.7 to -8.9 d) than patients with tracheostomy greater than or equal to 7 days. Similar differences were observed at 14 days but not at 3 days for both traumatic brain injury and nontraumatic brain injury patients. At the 3- and 7-day cut points, both traumatic brain injury and nontraumatic brain injury patients with tracheostomy prior to the cut point had lower risk of pneumonia and risk of discharge to a facility than those with tracheostomy after the cut point.
CONCLUSIONS: For injured adolescents, tracheostomy less than 7 days after admission was associated with improved in-hospital outcomes compared with those who remained intubated greater than or equal to 7 days and with those with tracheostomy greater than or equal to 7 days. Tracheostomy between 3 and 7 days may be the optimal time point when prolonged need for mechanical ventilation is anticipated; however, unmeasured consequences of tracheostomy such as long-term complications and care needs must also be considered.
Copyright © 2021 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34192728      PMCID: PMC8259766          DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.971


  28 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective task force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  N R MacIntyre; D J Cook; E W Ely; S K Epstein; J B Fink; J E Heffner; D Hess; R D Hubmayer; D J Scheinhorn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Changes in the work of breathing induced by tracheotomy in ventilator-dependent patients.

Authors:  J L Diehl; S El Atrous; D Touchard; F Lemaire; L Brochard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Impact of tracheostomy timing on outcome after severe head injury.

Authors:  Elias B Rizk; Akshal S Patel; Christina M Stetter; Vernon M Chinchilli; Kevin M Cockroft
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  The influence of tracheostomy timing on outcomes in trauma patients: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shi-Qi Cai; Jun-Wu Hu; Dong Liu; Xiang-Jun Bai; Jie Xie; Jia-Jun Chen; Fan Yang; Tao Liu
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Impact of tracheotomy on sedative administration, sedation level, and comfort of mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Ania Nieszkowska; Alain Combes; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Hichem Ksibi; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Claude Gibert; Jean Chastre
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The impact of tracheostomy timing in patients with severe head injury: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Hao-Kuang Wang; Kang Lu; Po-Chou Liliang; Kuo-Wei Wang; Han-Jung Chen; Tai-Been Chen; Cheng-Loong Liang
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Tracheostomy in ventilator dependent trauma patients: a prospective, randomized intention-to-treat study.

Authors:  Erik S Barquist; Jose Amortegui; Ali Hallal; Giovanni Giannotti; Robb Whinney; Heythem Alzamel; Jana MacLeod
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-01

8.  Extubation Failure and Tracheostomy Placement in Children with Acute Neurocritical Illness.

Authors:  Ellen C Cohn; Tammy S Robertson; Stacey A Scott; Andre M Finley; Rong Huang; Darryl K Miles
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Parental Conflict, Regret, and Short-term Impact on Quality of Life in Tracheostomy Decision-Making.

Authors:  Tessie W October; Amy H Jones; Hannah Greenlick Michals; Lauren M Hebert; Jiji Jiang; Jichuan Wang
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.624

10.  Indications and complications of tracheostomy in children.

Authors:  Caroline Harumi Itamoto; Bruno Thieme Lima; Juliana Sato; Reginaldo Raimundo Fujita
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.