Jovana V Milić1, Bruno Ehrler2, Concha Molina3, Michael Saliba4,5, Juan Bisquert6. 1. Laboratory of Photonics and Interfaces, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. 2. Center for Nanophotonics, AMOLF, Science Park 104, 1098XG Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Universitat de València, València, Spain. 4. Institute for Photovoltaics (ipv), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. 5. Helmholtz Young Investigator Group FRONTRUNNER, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany. 6. Institute of Advanced Materials, Universitat Jaume I, Castelló, Spain.
International conferences are an essential component of the timely exchange of ideas
and results in the scientific community, where scientists present their results,
gain new insights, and meet colleagues and collaborators. In early 2020, a global
pandemic caused by a coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and the corresponding disease
(covid-19) resulted in a number of conferences being canceled or postponed.[1] To foster scientific exchange despite the restrictions, a range
of initiatives were launched across the globe to move international conferences
online.[2−8]The Perils of Traditional Scientific Meetings. Sharing knowledge is
an imperative for scientists. This process leads to communicating results,
findings, observations, and views arising from the research activities.[9] For scientific activities to become part of the shared body of
knowledge, a formal communication process is an integral component of science.
Communication, reputation, and impact are thereby important drivers of scientific
progress.[10] There are two main channels of formal
scientific communication, which are either written or oral. While written
communication comes in the form of scientific papers, oral communication occurs
mainly during scientific conferences (Figure , left). Both channels have a long tradition, and papers published
in scientific journals are the most dominant format in which scientific knowledge
resides. However, over the last few decades, the advent of digital media and
communication has dramatically transformed the means and pace of scientific
publications. The leading scientific journals publish papers in a more accessible
way, including attractive formats that appeal to general readership.[11]
Figure 1
Left: Scientific communication at international conferences. Copyright:
teravector@123RF.com. Right: Online Conferences. Copyright: Bakhtiar
Zein, 123RF.com.
Left: Scientific communication at international conferences. Copyright:
teravector@123RF.com. Right: Online Conferences. Copyright: Bakhtiar
Zein, 123RF.com.On the other hand, the format of scientific conferences has practically remained
unchanged despite the digital revolution. At the same time, the number of
conferences increased dramatically with the extended connectivity and travel. In
the late 20th century, scientific conferences consisted mostly of large regular
events joined by the entire scientific community. However, since 2010, the
combination of several factors, including the ease of launching a conference, the
appearance of new and rapidly expanding topics, such as perovskite solar cells,
along with the extraordinary growth of the scientific system in Asia, led to an
increase in the number of conferences, which has in turn affected the rate of
international travel.The scientific community has long been pointing out the negative impact of intense
professional mobility. For instance, Sir Fraser Stoddart, professor at
Northwestern University, reported that the number of his international travel
appointments increased from around 20 to more than 60 per year after receiving the
2016 Nobel Prize.[12] These are exceptional travel schedules.
Scientists at the professor level emit on average around 11 tons of CO2
per year, and around 4 tons at a student level.[13] This is
unsustainable, especially for a community that works on shaping the future of our
planet. As mobility becomes increasingly important for scientists, they are often
viewed as global nomads,[14] living between international
meetings, seminars, and conferences on flights and train rides throughout the
year.[15−17] We are
only beginning to grasp the implications of such a lifestyle on our carbon
footprint, equal opportunities, and personal well-being, including
work–life balance.[15−17]Traditionally, attending a scientific conference has been a matter of high
professional importance and personal excitement. However, this format is presently
questioned by the community. Apart from the large carbon footprint associated with
the international flights, most international conferences remain scarcely
accessible to a wide set of researchers, including persons with disabilities and
those with limited resources or having caring and family commitments. This further
reduces the capacity for frequent communication with a broader audience, unless
one continuously attends events, which in turns stimulates competition to attract
prominent invited speakers, leaving declined invitations to be even perceived
negatively. As a result, most invited speakers often belong to the same pool of
scientists, and thus, speaking at more conferences does not necessarily result in
higher visibility. Therefore, attending conferences becomes a challenging
enterprise, consuming time and resources, whereas professional benefits are not
always apparent.[14]The Emergence of Online Conferencing. In the time of worldwide
confinements disrupting travel plans, it comes as no surprise that the scientific
community has been striving to find an alternative. This has been particularly
important toward the efforts to minimize the environmental impact of
travel.[15−18] Since major scientific meetings
and conferences have been canceled or postponed, such as those of the Materials
Research Society (MRS), American Chemical Society (ACS), as well as Gordon
Research Conferences (GRC), more representatives of the community moved their
international activities online (Figure , right).[4−7,19−21] This provided a unique learning opportunity for students
and researchers, along with the possibility to explore various research areas
remotely.There has been an effort from the energy research community in this direction. In
particular, the nanoGe platform has organized a new series of online meetups that
gathered the photovoltaics community,[2] along with the first
virtual perovskite conference (ViPerCon) that took place in April 2020,[3] jointly bringing together more than 1200 attendees worldwide
over several days of online seminars (Figure ). This provided a new stage to meet and exchange ideas, typically
opening with lectures of some of the leading experts in the research field,
followed by a moderated Q&A session and ePoster presentations. The talks and
Q&A took place in a video chat platform with questions submitted in writing
and a moderator managing the logistics. The online poster sessions were placed in
a separate chat platform that enabled discussion between participants.
Figure 2
Impressions from the nanoGe Online Meetups and the ViPerCon. Image
Credit: @nanoGe_Conf.[22]
Impressions from the nanoGe Online Meetups and the ViPerCon. Image
Credit: @nanoGe_Conf.[22]A few early lessons learned suggest that the talks were more effective if comparably
short in this format, and that Q&A in a panel setting works very well. On the
other hand, when scheduling virtual events, it has been proven necessary to
carefully consider the differences in time zones, which can be a drawback for some
participants, as keeping the attention on the screen for a long period of time
during very early or late hours is particularly demanding. In this regard, the
digital environment also requires an attractive and interactive format because of
the ease of leaving the virtual space with a “click”. Some of the
limitations of online conferences have also been the absence of contributing talks
that would broaden the scope and give more opportunities to early-career
researchers. In addition, one of the main challenges is to enable the interaction
between participants that is at the heart of scientific conferences, where social
life, informal discussions, and more personal exchanges generate essential
contacts and cooperation, enhancing the scientific activity and research progress
in general. While these personal interactions cannot be substituted, online
conferences provide a unique opportunity to complement traditional conference
formats while upholding the benefits[23] of presenting and
receiving feedback, keeping up with cutting-edge research, sharing research
insights, and having the opportunity to be exposed to inspiring ideas and people,
as well as maintaining the sense of community.This stimulates a number of online initiatives, including short professional meetings
that concentrate on particularly interesting research topics, such as those
organized by the nanoGe Online Meetups,[2] as well as the
continuation of earlier online events that are increasingly important, such as the
RSC Twitter Posters.[20] Furthermore, major events have moved
online to maintain the sense of rich scholarly days of traditional conferences,
such as the 12th Conference on Hybrid and Organic Photovoltaics (HOPV) that has
been transformed into the HOPV20 Online Conference.[24] This
effort is complemented with other educational programs, including webinars and
courses, along with scientific discussions hosted by local research institutes,
which have been substituted by video conferencing, opening them to the global
scientific community. These online activities are shaping scientific communication
beyond the traditional format.What We Learned Moving Forward. Following the experience of online
conferences, it has become clear that international gatherings can take place
online without compromising the quality of the scientific exchange (Figure ). Some of the presentations,
such as the online posters, are even enhanced by the multimedia content (e.g.,
video presentations). Moreover, the online events have proven to be more
accessible, providing the opportunity for a greater number of researchers across
the globe to attend at affordable prices and with minimal carbon footprint. This
factor has brought a more diverse community together, including those who often do
not have the resources to undertake long and expensive intercontinental journeys
or cannot attend because of family care or other responsibilities. Finally, the
interaction between the speakers and the attendees appears to be facilitated
online as compared to in-person conferences, with many more questions following
the talks and panel discussions. Each talk sparked more questions than there was
time to answer them. Presumably, the somewhat less personal interaction lowers the
barriers for the intimidating act of asking a question. While one-on-one
discussions and direct personal exchanges remain more challenging in the early
online formats, further advancements might be able to overcome this obstacle as
well.
Online conferencing. Copyright: Andrii Torianyk (left) and Anastasiia
Nevestenko (right), 123RF.com.All in all, online conferences are not likely to entirely replace in-person meetings.
However, a global crisis has created another stage for emerging online tools that
have the potential to dramatically reduce the scientific “travel
circus” and provide a more accessible, inclusive, and diverse platform for
scientific exchange. This progress could be further enhanced by the development of
digital technologies (e.g., virtual reality) and introducing “hybrid
conference” events including both in-person and online sessions. We hope
that the community uses this momentum to transform the conference experience in
the future.
Authors: Elena J Cassella; Emma L K Spooner; Timothy Thornber; Mary E O'Kane; Thomas E Catley; James E Bishop; Joel A Smith; Onkar S Game; David G Lidzey Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 17.521