Literature DB >> 34191783

A Web-Based Deep Learning Model for Automated Diagnosis of Otoscopic Images.

Kotaro Tsutsumi1, Khodayar Goshtasbi1, Adwight Risbud1, Pooya Khosravi1,2, Jonathan C Pang1, Harrison W Lin1, Hamid R Djalilian1,2, Mehdi Abouzari1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a multiclass-classifier deep learning model and website for distinguishing tympanic membrane (TM) pathologies based on otoscopic images.
METHODS: An otoscopic image database developed by utilizing publicly available online images and open databases was assessed by convolutional neural network (CNN) models including ResNet-50, Inception-V3, Inception-Resnet-V2, and MobileNetV2. Training and testing were conducted with a 75:25 breakdown. Area under the curve of receiver operating characteristics (AUC-ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were used to compare different CNN models' performances in classifying TM images.
RESULTS: Our database included 400 images, organized into normal (n = 196) and abnormal classes (n = 204), including acute otitis media (n = 116), otitis externa (n = 44), chronic suppurative otitis media (n = 23), and cerumen impaction (n = 21). For binary classification between normal versus abnormal TM, the best performing model had average AUC-ROC of 0.902 (MobileNetV2), followed by 0.745 (Inception-Resnet-V2), 0.731 (ResNet-50), and 0.636 (Inception-V3). Accuracy ranged between 0.73-0.77, sensitivity 0.72-0.88, specificity 0.58-0.84, PPV 0.68-0.81, and NPV 0.73-0.83. Macro-AUC-ROC for MobileNetV2 based multiclass-classifier was 0.91, with accuracy of 66%. Binary and multiclass-classifier models based on MobileNetV2 were loaded onto a publicly accessible and user-friendly website (https://headneckml.com/tympanic). This allows the readership to upload TM images for real-time predictions using the developed algorithms.
CONCLUSIONS: Novel CNN algorithms were developed with high AUC-ROCs for differentiating between various TM pathologies. This was further deployed as a proof-of-concept publicly accessible website for real-time predictions.
Copyright © 2021, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34191783      PMCID: PMC8448915          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.619


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of traditional otoscope to iPhone otoscope in the pediatric ED.

Authors:  John R Richards; Kelsey A Gaylor; Ashley J Pilgrim
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Otoscopy simulation training in a classroom setting: a novel approach to teaching otoscopy to medical students.

Authors:  Joel Davies; Lucas Djelic; Paolo Campisi; Vito Forte; Albino Chiodo
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Assessing diagnostic accuracy and tympanocentesis skills in the management of otitis media.

Authors:  M E Pichichero; M D Poole
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-10

4.  Is it possible to diagnose acute otitis media accurately in primary health care?

Authors:  Karin Blomgren; Anne Pitkäranta
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 5.  Otitis media: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Kathryn M Harmes; R Alexander Blackwood; Heather L Burrows; James M Cooke; R Van Harrison; Peter P Passamani
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 6.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 202.731

Review 7.  Burden of disease caused by otitis media: systematic review and global estimates.

Authors:  Lorenzo Monasta; Luca Ronfani; Federico Marchetti; Marcella Montico; Liza Vecchi Brumatti; Alessandro Bavcar; Domenico Grasso; Chiara Barbiero; Giorgio Tamburlini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Automated diagnosis of ear disease using ensemble deep learning with a big otoendoscopy image database.

Authors:  Dongchul Cha; Chongwon Pae; Si-Baek Seong; Jae Young Choi; Hae-Jeong Park
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 8.143

9.  Automated acquisition of explainable knowledge from unannotated histopathology images.

Authors:  Yoichiro Yamamoto; Toyonori Tsuzuki; Jun Akatsuka; Masao Ueki; Hiromu Morikawa; Yasushi Numata; Taishi Takahara; Takuji Tsuyuki; Kotaro Tsutsumi; Ryuto Nakazawa; Akira Shimizu; Ichiro Maeda; Shinichi Tsuchiya; Hiroyuki Kanno; Yukihiro Kondo; Manabu Fukumoto; Gen Tamiya; Naonori Ueda; Go Kimura
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Building an Otoscopic screening prototype tool using deep learning.

Authors:  Devon Livingstone; Aron S Talai; Justin Chau; Nils D Forkert
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-11-26
View more
  2 in total

1.  Automated classification of otitis media with OCT: augmenting pediatric image datasets with gold-standard animal model data.

Authors:  Guillermo L Monroy; Jungeun Won; Jindou Shi; Malcolm C Hill; Ryan G Porter; Michael A Novak; Wenzhou Hong; Pawjai Khampang; Joseph E Kerschner; Darold R Spillman; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Artificial intelligence to classify ear disease from otoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Al-Rahim Habib; Majid Kajbafzadeh; Zubair Hasan; Eugene Wong; Hasantha Gunasekera; Chris Perry; Raymond Sacks; Ashnil Kumar; Narinder Singh
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.729

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.