Literature DB >> 34191578

Increasing the efficiency of a national laboratory response to COVID-19; a nation-wide multicenter evaluation of 47 commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays by 41 laboratories.

Maaike J C van den Beld1, Jean-Luc Murk2, Jan Kluytmans3,4, Marion P G Koopmans5, Johan Reimerink1, Inge H M van Loo6, Marjolijn C A Wegdam-Blans7, Hans Zaaijer8, Corine GeurtsvanKessel5, Chantal Reusken1.   

Abstract

In response to the worldwide pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and the subsequent overflowing of the market regarding antibody tests, a nationwide collaborative approach in the Netherlands was employed. Forty-one Dutch laboratories joined forces and shared their evaluation data, to allow for the evaluation of a quantity of serological assays for SARS-CoV-2, that exceeds the capacity of each individual laboratory. As of April 2020, these performance data had been aggregated and shared in regularly updated reports with other laboratories, Dutch government, public health organizations and the public. This frequently updated overview of assay performance increased the efficiency of our national laboratory response, supporting laboratories in their choice and implementation of assays. Aggregated performance data for 47 immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 showed that none of the evaluated immunoassays that detect IgM or IgA only met the diagnostic criteria, indicating that they are not suitable for e diagnosing acute infections. For the detection of IgG, only BIOZEK Corona virus COVID rapid test, EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 IgG and Wantai SARS-CoV-2 Ab ELISA met predefined performance criteria in hospitalized patients where samples were collected 14 days post onset, while for patients with mild or asymptomatic infections only the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 Ab ELISA met the predefined performance criteria if samples were collected 14 days post onset. Here we describe this unique nationwide collaboration during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the collected data and their results are an example of what can be accomplished when forces are joined during a public health crisis.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34191578     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00767-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  3 in total

1.  A Comparative Study of Nine SARS-CoV-2 IgG Lateral Flow Assays Using Both Post-Infection and Post-Vaccination Samples.

Authors:  Leontine Mulder; Benoit Carrères; Franco Muggli; Alix Zollinger; John Corthésy; Adrianne Klijn; Giuseppe Togni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Exposure factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence during the first eight months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Demi M E Pagen; Stephanie Brinkhues; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Casper D J den Heijer; Noortje Bouwmeester-Vincken; Daniëlle A T Hanssen; Inge H M van Loo; Paul H M Savelkoul; Christian J P A Hoebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  SARS-CoV-2 infection in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of standardised seroprevalence studies, from January 2020 to December 2021.

Authors:  Hannah C Lewis; Harriet Ware; Mairead Whelan; Lorenzo Subissi; Zihan Li; Xiaomeng Ma; Anthony Nardone; Marta Valenciano; Brianna Cheng; Kim Noel; Christian Cao; Mercedes Yanes-Lane; Belinda L Herring; Ambrose Talisuna; Nsenga Ngoy; Thierno Balde; David Clifton; Maria D Van Kerkhove; David Buckeridge; Niklas Bobrovitz; Joseph Okeibunor; Rahul K Arora; Isabel Bergeri
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.