Darlene R House1,2, Yogendra Amatya3, Benjamin Nti4, Frances M Russell4. 1. Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. dhouse@iu.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 720 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. dhouse@iu.edu. 3. Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 720 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is helpful for the evaluation of patients with dyspnea in the emergency department (ED). However, it remains unclear how much training and how many LUS examinations are needed for ED physicians to obtain proficiency. The objective of this study was to determine the threshold number of LUS physicians need to perform to achieve proficiency for interpreting LUS on ED patients with dyspnea. METHODS: A prospective study was performed at Patan Hospital in Nepal, evaluating proficiency of physicians novice to LUS. After eight hours of didactics and hands-on training, physicians independently performed and interpreted ultrasounds on patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea. An expert sonographer blinded to patient data and LUS interpretation reviewed images and provided an expert interpretation. Interobserver agreement was performed between the study physician and expert physician interpretation. Cumulative sum analysis was used to determine the number of scans required to attain an acceptable level of training. RESULTS: Nineteen physicians were included in the study, submitting 330 LUS examinations with 3288 lung zones. Eighteen physicians (95%) reached proficiency. Physicians reached proficiency for interpreting LUS accurately when compared to an expert after 4.4 (SD 2.2) LUS studies for individual zone interpretation and 4.8 (SD 2.3) studies for overall interpretation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following 1 day of training, the majority of physicians novice to LUS achieved proficiency with interpretation of lung ultrasound after less than five ultrasound examinations performed independently.
BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is helpful for the evaluation of patients with dyspnea in the emergency department (ED). However, it remains unclear how much training and how many LUS examinations are needed for ED physicians to obtain proficiency. The objective of this study was to determine the threshold number of LUS physicians need to perform to achieve proficiency for interpreting LUS on ED patients with dyspnea. METHODS: A prospective study was performed at Patan Hospital in Nepal, evaluating proficiency of physicians novice to LUS. After eight hours of didactics and hands-on training, physicians independently performed and interpreted ultrasounds on patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea. An expert sonographer blinded to patient data and LUS interpretation reviewed images and provided an expert interpretation. Interobserver agreement was performed between the study physician and expert physician interpretation. Cumulative sum analysis was used to determine the number of scans required to attain an acceptable level of training. RESULTS: Nineteen physicians were included in the study, submitting 330 LUS examinations with 3288 lung zones. Eighteen physicians (95%) reached proficiency. Physicians reached proficiency for interpreting LUS accurately when compared to an expert after 4.4 (SD 2.2) LUS studies for individual zone interpretation and 4.8 (SD 2.3) studies for overall interpretation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Following 1 day of training, the majority of physicians novice to LUS achieved proficiency with interpretation of lung ultrasound after less than five ultrasound examinations performed independently.
Authors: Po-Yang Tsou; Kenneth P Chen; Yu-Hsun Wang; Jennifer Fishe; Jason Gillon; Chien-Chang Lee; Julia K Deanehan; Pei-Lun Kuo; Daniel Ta Yo Yu Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Scott J Millington; Robert T Arntfield; Robert Jie Guo; Seth Koenig; Pierre Kory; Vicki Noble; Haney Mallemat; Jordan R Schoenherr Journal: Crit Ultrasound J Date: 2017-11-22
Authors: Pia Iben Pietersen; Kristian Rørbæk Madsen; Ole Graumann; Lars Konge; Bjørn Ulrik Nielsen; Christian Borbjerg Laursen Journal: Crit Ultrasound J Date: 2018-09-03
Authors: Concetta Pirozzi; Fabio G Numis; Antonio Pagano; Paolo Melillo; Roberto Copetti; Fernando Schiraldi Journal: Crit Ultrasound J Date: 2014-04-27
Authors: Frances M Russell; Robinson Ferre; Robert R Ehrman; Vicki Noble; Luna Gargani; Sean P Collins; Phillip D Levy; Katarina L Fabre; George J Eckert; Peter S Pang Journal: ESC Heart Fail Date: 2020-07-22