Literature DB >> 34190668

Ultra-processed food consumption and adult obesity risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Sajjad Moradi1, Mohammad Hassan Entezari1, Hamed Mohammadi2, Ahmad Jayedi3, Anastasia-Viktoria Lazaridi4, Mohammad Ali Hojjati Kermani5, Maryam Miraghajani6.   

Abstract

We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate observational studies assessing the association between ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and the risk of overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity in the general population. We searched the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and ISI Web of Science from inception until December 2020. Data were extracted from 12 studies (nine cross-sectional and three cohort studies). Odds ratio (OR) were pooled using a random-effects model. UPF consumption was associated with an increased risk of obesity (OR = 1.55; 95% CI: 1.36, 1.77; I2 = 55%), overweight (OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.63; I2 = 73%), and abdominal obesity (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.18, 1.68; I2 = 62%). Furthermore, every 10% increase of UPF consumption in daily calorie intake was associated with a 7%, a 6%, and a 5% higher risk of overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity, respectively. Dose-response meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies showed a positive linear association between UPF consumption and abdominal obesity. There was also a positive linear association between UPF consumption and risk of overweight/obesity in the analysis of cross-sectional studies and a positive monotonic association in the analysis of cohort studies. Our study suggests that UPF consumption is associated with an increased risk of excess weight or abdominal obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ultra-processed food; abdominal obesity; meta-analysis; obesity; overweight

Year:  2021        PMID: 34190668     DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1946005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr        ISSN: 1040-8398            Impact factor:   11.176


  7 in total

1.  Nutritional Quality of Pre-Packaged Foods in China under Various Nutrient Profile Models.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Huijun Wang; Puhong Zhang; Barry M Popkin; Daisy H Coyle; Jingmin Ding; Le Dong; Jiguo Zhang; Wenwen Du; Simone Pettigrew
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  Sensory-Related Industrial Additives in the US Packaged Food Supply.

Authors:  Marilyn Tseng; Camille J Grigsby; Abigail Austin; Samir Amin; Aydin Nazmi
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-01-13

3.  Factors Influencing Changes in Food Preparation during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Associations with Food Intake among Japanese Adults.

Authors:  Fumi Hayashi; Yukari Takemi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 4.  The Role of Diet Quality in Mediating the Association between Ultra-Processed Food Intake, Obesity and Health-Related Outcomes: A Review of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Samuel J Dicken; Rachel L Batterham
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Dietitians Australia position statement on healthy and sustainable diets.

Authors:  Liza Barbour; Ellyn Bicknell; Julie Brimblecombe; Stefanie Carino; Molly Fairweather; Mark Lawrence; Juliet Slattery; Julie Woods; Elizabeth World
Journal:  Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 6.  Current therapies and new developments in NASH.

Authors:  Jean-François Dufour; Quentin M Anstee; Elisabetta Bugianesi; Stephen Harrison; Rohit Loomba; Valerie Paradis; Herbert Tilg; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Shira Zelber-Sagi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 31.793

7.  The degree of food processing is associated with anthropometric measures of obesity in Canadian families with preschool-aged children.

Authors:  Rahbika Ashraf; Alison M Duncan; Gerarda Darlington; Andrea C Buchholz; Jess Haines; David W L Ma
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.