Helgar Musyoki1, Parinita Bhattacharjee2,3, Keith Sabin4, Ed Ngoksin5, Tisha Wheeler6, Gina Dallabetta7. 1. National AIDS and STI Control Programme (NASCOP), Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya. 2. Institute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 3. Partners for Health and Development in Africa, Nairobi, Kenya. 4. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Geneva, Switzerland. 5. Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM), Geneva, Switzerland. 6. United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington, DC, USA. 7. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Key populations (KP) continue to account for high HIV incidence globally. Still, prioritization of KP in the national HIV prevention response remains insufficient, leading to their suboptimal access to HIV programmes. This commentary aims to share Kenya's challenges and successes in achieving 2020 global HIV targets and scaling up the KP programme in the last decade. DISCUSSION: The KP programme in Kenya has scaled up in the last decade with the inclusion of female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), transgender people and people in prisons as priority populations in the national HIV response. KP coverage based on official size estimates for FSW is 73%, for MSM is 82%, for PWID through needle syringe programme (NSP) is 71%, and through opioid substitution therapy (OST) is 26% and for transgender people is 5%. The service outcomes for KP have been relatively strong in prevention with high condom use at last paid sex for FSW (92%) and use of sterile equipment among PWID (88%), though condom use at last sex with a non-regular partner among MSM (78%) is still low. The KP programme has not met care continuum targets for all subpopulations with low case findings. The national KP programme led by the Ministry of Health has scaled up the programme through (a) strategic partnerships with KP-led and competent organizations, researchers and donors; (b) development of policy guidance and programme standards; (c) continuous sensitization and advocacy to garner support; (d) development of national reporting systems, among others. However, the programme is still struggling with uncertain size estimates; lack of updated bio-behavioural survey data; inadequate scale-up of interventions among transgender people and people in prison settings; gaps in reaching adolescent and young KP, and effectively addressing structural barriers like violence and stigma. CONCLUSIONS: To reach the ambitious global HIV targets, sufficient coverage of KP with quality HIV programmes is critical. Despite scaling up the KP programme, Kenya has not yet achieved the 2020 global HIV targets and needs more efforts to scale-up quality programmes for KP who are underserved in the HIV response.
INTRODUCTION: Key populations (KP) continue to account for high HIV incidence globally. Still, prioritization of KP in the national HIV prevention response remains insufficient, leading to their suboptimal access to HIV programmes. This commentary aims to share Kenya's challenges and successes in achieving 2020 global HIV targets and scaling up the KP programme in the last decade. DISCUSSION: The KP programme in Kenya has scaled up in the last decade with the inclusion of female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), transgender people and people in prisons as priority populations in the national HIV response. KP coverage based on official size estimates for FSW is 73%, for MSM is 82%, for PWID through needle syringe programme (NSP) is 71%, and through opioid substitution therapy (OST) is 26% and for transgender people is 5%. The service outcomes for KP have been relatively strong in prevention with high condom use at last paid sex for FSW (92%) and use of sterile equipment among PWID (88%), though condom use at last sex with a non-regular partner among MSM (78%) is still low. The KP programme has not met care continuum targets for all subpopulations with low case findings. The national KP programme led by the Ministry of Health has scaled up the programme through (a) strategic partnerships with KP-led and competent organizations, researchers and donors; (b) development of policy guidance and programme standards; (c) continuous sensitization and advocacy to garner support; (d) development of national reporting systems, among others. However, the programme is still struggling with uncertain size estimates; lack of updated bio-behavioural survey data; inadequate scale-up of interventions among transgender people and people in prison settings; gaps in reaching adolescent and young KP, and effectively addressing structural barriers like violence and stigma. CONCLUSIONS: To reach the ambitious global HIV targets, sufficient coverage of KP with quality HIV programmes is critical. Despite scaling up the KP programme, Kenya has not yet achieved the 2020 global HIV targets and needs more efforts to scale-up quality programmes for KP who are underserved in the HIV response.
Authors: Sungai T Chabata; Rumbidzo Makandwa; Bernadette Hensen; Phillis Mushati; Tarisai Chiyaka; Sithembile Musemburi; Joanna Busza; Sian Floyd; Isolde Birdthistle; James R Hargreaves; Frances M Cowan Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Date: 2022-07-27
Authors: Parinita Bhattacharjee; Abednego Musau; Griffins Manguro; Patricia Ongwen; Jane Mutegi; Japheth Kioko; Lisa Lazarus; Shajy Isac; Helgar Musyoki; Jan Hontelez; Daniel Were Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2022-08 Impact factor: 6.707