| Literature DB >> 34189445 |
Shiyu Lu1, Yuqi Liu2, Yingqi Guo2, Hung Chak Ho3, Yimeng Song4,5, Wei Cheng3, Cheryl Hiu Kwan Chui2, On Fung Chan1, Chris Webster6, Rebecca Lai Har Chiu3, Terry Yat Sang Lum1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of how intrinsic capacity (IC) and neighbourhood physical environment shape functional ability (FA) trajectories in later life remains understudied. We investigated four-year trajectories of IC and their impact on FA trajectories and the association between neighbourhood physical environment and FA trajectories among community-dwelling older adults in Hong Kong, China.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34189445 PMCID: PMC8219998 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EClinicalMedicine ISSN: 2589-5370
Fig. 1Graphical representation of the parallel process of latent growth curve modelling to estimate baseline and change of IC and FA over time. IC=Intrinsic Capacity; FA=Functional ability; IADL= Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; only statistically significant paths are shown (unstandardised estimates) and standard error are displayed in parentheses. Model fit: χ2 = 258.57, df = 18, Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.080, Comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.963, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.907, Standardized root-mean-square residual (SRMR) = 0.032 *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.
Baseline characteristics of respondents.
| Individual-level variables ( | Mean (S.D.) / N (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years (range = 65–101) | 79.64 (7.97) | |
| Women | 1,162 (55.84%) | |
| Education level | ||
| No formal education | 995 (47.88%) | |
| Primary | 636 (30.61%) | |
| Secondary | 406 (19.54%) | |
| Post-secondary | 41 (1.97%) | |
| Missing | 3 (0.14%) | |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 1,234 (59.53%) | |
| Divorced/Widowed/Single | 839 (40.47%) | |
| Missing | 8 (0.38%) | |
| Number of chronic diseases | ||
| None | 282 (13.55%) | |
| One | 447 (21.48%) | |
| Two and more | 1,352 (64.97%) | |
Notes: S.D. = standard deviation.
Change of subdomains of intrinsic capacity and functional ability among older adults over time.
| Dimension | 2014 | 2015 | 2017 | Test for difference between means from 2014 to 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (S.D.) | Mean (S.D.) | Mean (S.D.) | F | |||
| Cognition | Executive | 2.72 (1.33) | 2.91 (1.39) | 2.8 (1.28) | 10.73 | <0.001 |
| Attention | 4.46 (1.57) | 4.56 (1.53) | 4.52 (1.52) | 2.57 | 0.08 | |
| Memory | 2.16 (1.94) | 2.31 (1.86) | 2.52 (1.89) | 17.61 | <0.001 | |
| Orientation | 5.47 (0.95) | 5.37 (1.05) | 5.22 (1.29) | 28.17 | <0.001 | |
| Abstraction | 1.06 (0.87) | 1.07 (0.85) | 0.89 (0.85) | 26.03 | <0.001 | |
| Language | 3.52 (1.59) | 3.68 (1.62) | 3.57 (1.62) | 5.98 | <0.001 | |
| Affect | Depression | 2.7 (3.17) | 2.45 (3.12) | 1.88 (2.90) | 32.87 | <0.001 |
| Vitality | Frailty | 0.80 (1.04) | 0.86 (1.06) | 0.94 (1.11) | 7.83 | <0.001 |
| Sensory | Vision impairment | 1.34 (0.50) | 1.26 (0.48) | 1.26 (0.50) | 12.88 | 0.25 |
| Hearing impairment | 1.25 (0.48) | 1.24 (0.47) | 1.26 (0.53) | 1.39 | 0.25 | |
| Locomotor | Steadiness | 1.56 (0.63) | 1.61 (0.60) | 1.54 (0.66) | 5.32 | 0.01 |
| Hand grip strength | 37.12 (16.14) | 39.07 (14.96) | 39.64 (15.13) | 30.84 | <0.001 | |
| IADL | 15.60 (3.40) | 15.51 (3.63) | 15.15 (4.11) | 14.43 | <0.001 | |
Notes: SD = standard deviation. IADL = Instrumental activities of daily living, with higher scores indicating better functional ability. Repeated measures ANOVA for the tests for the difference between means from 2014 to 2017. Six domains of cognition were measured by a Cantonese Chinese Montreal Cognitive Assessment Version, with higher scores indicating better cognition function; Depression was measured by 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptom. The steadiness when walking was measured by a single-item self-report question that whether participants feel unsteady or at risk of losing their balance when walking and turning (range = 0–2), with higher scores indicating less unsteadiness. The frailty was measured by FRAIL scale (range = 0–5), with higher scores indicating more frailty. Vision and hearing were measured by two single-item questions about participants’ vision and hearing (range = 1–3), with higher scores indicating more impairment. The higher scores for handgrip strength indicates better conditions.
Two separate unconditional latent growth curve modelling.
| LGCM for Intrinsic Capacity | LGCM for Functional Ability | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | S.E. | Estimate | S.E. | |||
| Intercept | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.902 | 14.88 | 0.09 | <0.001 |
| Slope | −0.02 | 0.01 | <0.001 | −0.20 | 0.04 | <0.001 |
| Variances | ||||||
| Intercept | 0.18 | 0.01 | <0.001 | 13.45 | 0.75 | <0.001 |
| Slope | 0.04 | 0.00 | <0.001 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.447 |
| Intercept-Slope | −0.04 | 0.01 | <0.001 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.181 |
| χ2 | 1.22 | <0.001 | 0.76 | >0.05 | ||
| RMSEA | 0.010 | 0.000 | ||||
| CFI | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
| TLI | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
| SRMR | 0.006 | 0.005 | ||||
Notes: Estimate = unstandardized coefficient; S.E. = standard error; RMSEA: Root-mean-square error of approximation; CFI = Comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; SRMR: Standardized root-mean-square residual.
Longitudinal associations between intrinsic capacities (IC), neighbourhood physical environments and functional ability (FA) of older adults: Latent growth curve models.
| Model 1 (within a 200-meter buffer area) | Model 2 (within a 500-meter buffer area) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept of FA | Slope of FA | Intercept of FA | Slope of FA | |||||||||
| β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | β | 95% CI | |||||
| Variables | ||||||||||||
| Intercept of IC | 8.33 | (7.82, 8.84) | <0.001 | 0.29 | (0.03, 0.56) | 0.072 | 8.31 | (7.80, 8.81) | <0.001 | 0.33 | (0.06, 0.59) | 0.042 |
| Slope of IC | 9.08 | (7.21, 10.96) | <0.001 | 8.91 | (7.08, 10.75) | <0.001 | ||||||
| Green Space% | −0.31 | (−1.75, 1.12) | 0.720 | 1.15 | (0.32, 1.99) | 0.023 | 0.74 | (−0.25, 1.74) | 0.218 | −0.39 | (−0.95, 0.18) | 0.259 |
| Land use mix | −0.30 | (−1.07, 0.47) | 0.515 | −0.08 | (−0.53, 0.36) | 0.765 | −1.02 | (−2.84, 0.81) | 0.360 | −0.42 | (−1.47, 0.62) | 0.508 |
| # of commercial facilities | −0.12 | (−0.23, −0.01) | 0.072 | 0.04 | (−0.02, 0.11) | 0.272 | 0.001 | (−0.04, 0.03) | 0.872 | −0.04 | (−0.06, −0.02) | 0.004 |
| # of community centres | −0.01 | (−0.19, 0.17) | 0.938 | 0.01 | (−0.09, 0.12) | 0.843 | −0.18 | (−0.32, −0.04) | 0.036 | 0.01 | (−0.08, 0.09) | 0.910 |
| # of leisure facilities | −0.01 | (−0.09, 0.07) | 0.804 | 0.00 | (−0.05, 0.05) | 0.999 | 0.01 | (−0.04, 0.06) | 0.677 | 0.03 | (0.01, 0.06) | 0.043 |
| # of public transport facilities | −0.08 | (−0.28, 0.12) | 0.515 | 0.01 | (−0.11, 0.13) | 0.924 | −0.01 | (−0.09, 0.07) | 0.891 | 0.08 | (0.04, 0.13) | 0.003 |
| # of health care facilities | 0.17 | (0.05, 0.29) | 0.021 | −0.07 | (−0.14, 0) | 0.092 | 0.15 | (0.06, 0.25) | 0.008 | −0.02 | (−0.08, 0.04) | 0.547 |
| Mean of intercept | 19.26 | (17.77, 20.74) | <0.001 | 19.47 | (17.32, 21.63) | <0.001 | ||||||
| Mean of slope | −0.14 | (−0.49, 0.22) | 0.520 | 0.37 | (−0.57, 1.32) | 0.517 | ||||||
| Residual of intercept | 3.97 | (3.16, 4.79) | <0.001 | 3.93 | (3.12, 4.74) | <0.001 | ||||||
| Residual of slope | −0.43 | (−0.89, 0.02) | 0.118 | −0.44 | (−0.89, 0.01) | 0.107 | ||||||
| N | 2,078 | 2,078 | ||||||||||
| Chi-Square (df) | 311.165 (51) | <0.001 | 360.049 (51) | <0.001 | ||||||||
| RMSEA | 0.050 | 0.054 | ||||||||||
| CFI | 0.960 | 0.953 | ||||||||||
| TLI | 0.937 | 0.926 | ||||||||||
| SRMR | 0.025 | 0.027 | ||||||||||
Notes: β = unstandardized coefficient; CI = Confident Intervals; # = number; RMSEA = Root-mean-square error of approximation; CFI = Comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; SRMR = Standardized root-mean-square residual.