Literature DB >> 34189205

Data on isotopic niche differentiation in benthic consumers from shallow-water hydrothermal vents and nearby non-vent rocky reefs in northeastern Taiwan.

Jing-Ying Wu1, Siou-Yan Lin1, Shao-Hung Peng2, Jia-Jang Hung1, Chen-Tung Arthur Chen1, Li-Lian Liu1,3.   

Abstract

This paper presents data on carbon and n class="Chemical">nitrogen stable isotopes in benthos from shallow-water hydrothermal vents (SV) and nearby non-vent rocky reefs (NV) located in northeastern Taiwan, which is related to the article "Isotopic niche differentiation in benthic consumers from shallow-water hydrothermal vents and nearby non-vent rocky reefs in northeastern Taiwan" [1]. Field sampling work was conducted in July 2009 and July-August 2010 to collect sediment organic matters (SOM), zooplankton, and benthos for carbon and nitrogen stable isotopic analyses. Scuba divers collected macrobenthos, seawater, and surface sediments (0-2 cm). The collection of zooplankton was by a North Pacific standard net and trawled vertically. Testing samples were lyophilized before grounding by a mortar and pestle. For carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses, approximately 1 mg of powder was weighed and encapsulated in a tin capsule. Analyses were performed at the stable isotope laboratory at the University of California at Davis using an Integra Mass Spectrometer elemental analyzer (PDZ Europa, Sandbach, UK). The information is presented as 187 and 53 unprocessed data points from SV and NV, which incorporates δ13C and δ15N values (‰) of sediment, zooplankton, and benthos' tissue samples. Data from SOM provides information about chemosynthetic activity in SV sites. These data can be used to correlate food sources of consumers inhabiting shallow-water hydrothermal vent and rocky reef ecosystems in subtropical regions.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon; Kueishan Islet; Macrobenthos; Nitrogen; Shallow-water hydrothermal vent; Stable isotopic analysis; Xenograpsus testudinatus

Year:  2021        PMID： 34189205      PMCID： PMC8217694          DOI： 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN： 2352-3409


Specifications Table

Value of the Data

The data is helpful to determine the trophic structure and the contribution of different food sources to benthic consumers in the shallow-water hydrothermal vents and coastal rocky reefs in northeastern Taiwan. Other researchers can use the data to reference further comparative studies in vent ecosystems with or without endemic species. The data can be compared with inter-site and inter-regional studies related to trophic structure and isotopic niche width of consumers with different feeding guilds in other benthic ecosystems.

Data Description

Data reported in the present study are collected on the northeast coast of Taiwan (Fig. 1). Table 1 contains water depth, temperature, and pH of the collection sites; the n class="Chemical">carbon and nitrogen stable isotopic values of 240 samples. The samples include benthic consumers, primary producers, copepods, zooplankton, fishes, and sediment organic matters (SOMs) from sites of shallow-water hydrothermal vents and non-vent rocky reefs.
Fig. 1

Map of the northeast coast of Taiwan showing sampling sites: A (White vent), B (Yellow vent), C (Tail of KS Islet), and D (Dali), modified from Wu et al. (2021).

Table 1

The carbon and nitrogen stable isotopic values of all samples from sites of shallow-water hydrothermal vents and non-vent rocky reefs.

LocationLatitude (°N)Longitude (°E)Distance to vent center (m)Depth (m)Water temperature (°C)pHSpeciesδ13C (‰)δ15N (‰)Sampling date
White vent24.83404121.96172~ 51725-267.3Prionurus scalprum-18.0412.162009-July-2
Alpheus lobidens-18.3310.242009-July-2
Alpheus lobidens-18.109.452010-August-25
Anachis sp.-16.309.782009-July-2
Anachis sp.-18.198.692009-July-2
Anachis sp.-16.978.672010-August-04
Anachis sp.-16.958.932010-August-04
Anachis sp.-17.478.942009-July-2
Ergalatax contractus-17.397.782009-July-2
Ergalatax contractus-16.2610.052009-July-2
Ischnochiton comptus-23.168.152009-July-2
Ischnochiton comptus-19.167.622010-July-2
Ischnochiton comptus-19.218.502010-July-2
Ischnochiton comptus-16.798.802010-July-2
Ischnochiton comptus-17.126.022009-July-2
Thylacodes dentiferus-17.347.162009-July-2
Thylacodes dentiferus-17.845.912010-July-2
Thylacodes dentiferus-17.896.112010-July-2
Thylacodes dentiferus-17.665.452010-July-2
Thylacodes dentiferus-17.906.282010-July-2
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-16.10-0.092009-July-2
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-17.793.622010-July-2
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-17.603.102010-August-04
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-16.920.422010-August-04
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-16.951.552010-August-04
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-16.800.202010-August-04
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-18.013.402010-August-04
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-17.794.692010-August-04
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-17.513.432010-July-2
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-16.951.632010-July-2
Anthopleura sp.-18.758.722010-August-04
Anthopleura sp.-18.678.552010-August-04
Anthopleura sp.-19.458.392010-July-2
Anthopleura sp.-19.618.192010-July-2
Anthopleura sp.-19.218.262010-July-2
Anthopleura sp.-18.748.162010-July-2
Anthopleura sp.-19.668.292010-July-2
Tubastraea aurea-19.278.052010-July-2
Tubastraea aurea-19.508.302010-July-2
Tubastraea aurea-19.638.542010-July-2
Tubastraea aurea-19.807.612010-July-2
Cirriformia sp.-19.667.292009-July-2
Glycera sp.-19.757.412009-July-2
Platynereis sp.-19.098.582009-July-2
Platynereis sp.-22.177.972010-July-2
Lanice sp.-18.856.692010-July-2
Harmothoe imbricata-17.159.142010-August-23
Xenograpsus testudinatus-18.288.442010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-18.209.162010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.428.292010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-14.844.022010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.538.432010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.628.302010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.728.342010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.897.512010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-13.737.312010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-18.977.402010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.768.472010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.067.312010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-18.928.702010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.807.732010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-19.208.182010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.807.672010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.527.352010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.926.382010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.487.602010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.267.542010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-19.238.782010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-18.288.342010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-18.248.542010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-19.698.272010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-18.808.272010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.037.412010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.707.512010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.546.982010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.827.532010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.447.722010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.997.942010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.777.132010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-15.734.722010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.708.942010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.376.852010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.128.042010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.307.472010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.508.222010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.397.402010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.867.972010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.218.752010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-14.998.552010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.088.102010-August-04
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.758.082010-August-04
Phascolosoma sp.-18.246.442009-July-2
Phascolosoma sp.-18.247.182010-July-2
Phascolosoma sp.-18.647.182010-July-2
Phascolosoma sp.-17.576.572010-July-2
Phascolosoma sp.-17.927.192010-August-23
Halichondrida sp1.-17.119.252009-July-2
Halichondrida sp2.-21.574.432010-July-2
Halichondrida sp2.-21.463.772010-July-2
Halichondrida sp2.-21.494.452010-July-2
Colpomenia sinuosa-16.224.002009-July-2
Sargassum sp.-22.055.032010-July-2
Gelidiopsis repens-32.913.642009-July-2
Gelidiopsis repens-24.212.702009-July-2
Gelidiopsis repens-31.424.032009-July-2
Gelidiopsis repens-22.323.312009-July-2
Caulerpa brachypus f. parvifolia-20.743.112009-July-2
Caulerpa brachypus f. parvifolia-20.923.092010-July-2
Caulerpa brachypus f. parvifolia-20.623.392010-July-2
Chaetomorpha spiralis-20.073.132009-July-2
Cladophora catenata-24.973.732009-July-2
Cladophora catenata-23.253.892009-July-2
Cladophora catenata-19.655.582009-July-2
Cladophora catenata-17.665.002009-July-2
Codium intricatum-14.323.322009-July-2
Ulva lactuca-20.873.592009-July-2
periphyton sp. 1-20.762.632010-July-2
periphyton sp. 1-14.722.062010-August-2
periphyton sp. 1-17.682.322010-August-2
Copepod(mix)-21.496.082009-July-2
Copepod(mix)-21.405.432009-July-2
Copepod(mix)-21.115.692009-July-2
Zooplankton(mix)-19.196.72010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-17.563.862009-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-19.58-3.232009-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-20.775.192009-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-18.793.652010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-18.512.332010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-18.792.342010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-21.642.482010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-19.689.372010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-25.61-1.122010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-16.45-1.252010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-16.74-3.122010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-15.760.702010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-17.330.312010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-17.81-3.602010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-21.750.862010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-16.603.762010-July-2
SOM(mix<10 um)-17.572.842010-July-2
Yellow vent24.83553121.96361~ 5726-277.8Trachinotus baillonii-16.9310.812009-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-15.916.212010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.377.812010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-15.225.392010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.287.602010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.126.792010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.107.372010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-15.716.272010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.517.032010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.777.182010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-15.796.502010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.008.002010-August-25
Xenograpsus testudinatus-14.994.402010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-17.968.572010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.747.412010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.976.532010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-16.847.292010-July-2
Xenograpsus testudinatus-15.713.892010-July-2
periphyton sp. 1-19.290.452010-August-25
periphyton sp. 1-23.851.602010-July-2
periphyton sp. 1-22.740.182010-August-25
periphyton sp. 1-21.050.272010-August-25
periphyton sp. 2-18.680.122010-August-25
periphyton sp. 2-18.390.782010-August-25
periphyton sp. 2-20.451.622010-August-25
periphyton sp. 2-20.970.812010-July-2
periphyton sp.3-22.601.412010-August-25
Copepod (mix)-21.305.972009-July-2
Copepod (mix)-21.094.862009-July-2
Copepod (mix)-21.689.492009-July-2
Zooplankton (mix)-20.216.772010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-24.00-2.462009-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-18.64-7.292009-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-24.99-6.132009-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-17.51-1.602010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-10.684.252010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-18.36-1.932010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-19.170.222010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-17.49-0.952010-July-2
Tail of KS Islet24.83404121.96172> 30007-17268.1Diagramma pictum-17.6411.072009-July-2
Flatheads sp.-16.0711.082009-July-2
Girella punctata-18.3510.442009-July-2
Paracaesio caerulea-16.7311.372009-July-2
Drupella cornus-15.338.792009-July-2
Morula granulata-15.737.302009-July-2
Morula granulata-15.6910.192009-July-2
Lygdamis japonicus-18.297.482009-July-2
Lygdamis japonicus-17.738.112009-July-2
Clathria echinata-20.076.472009-July-2
Callyspongia fallax-19.196.282009-July-2
Dysidea etheria-20.206.622009-July-2
Sargassum sp.-16.825.472010-July-2
Meristotheca papulosa-16.044.812010-July-2
Codium intricatum-13.075.322009-July-2
Ulva lactuca-14.745.232009-July-2
Copepod (mix)-21.464.622009-July-2
Copepod (mix)-20.835.802009-July-2
Copepod (mix)-21.216.332009-July-2
Zooplankton (mix)-20.286.442010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-13.794.052009-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-16.686.692009-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-15.405.712010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-14.384.672010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-15.155.522010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-14.70-5.672010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-13.912.672010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-13.244.022010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-14.932.832010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-13.724.722010-July-2
SOM (mix<10 um)-14.924.182010-July-2
Dali24.95743121.91960>140007-1726-278.1-8.2Choerodon azurio-17.3211.142009-July-3
Diagramma pictum-17.3811.782009-July-3
Parupeneus ciliatus-17.7911.852009-July-3
Prionurus scalprum-18.1810.992009-July-3
Stenopus hispidus-16.5110.092009-July-3
Uroptychus sp.-14.406.962009-July-3
Cronia margariticola-15.988.92009-July-3
Drupella cornus-14.099.442009-July-3
Drupella cornus-14.749.372009-July-3
Drupella cornus-14.4610.492009-July-3
Ergalatax contractus-15.6710.012009-July-3
Morula granulata-15.4011.252009-July-3
Thais clavigera-14.5110.652009-July-3
Liolophura japonica-4.505.572009-July-3
Liolophura japonica-12.147.982009-July-3
Rhyssoplax komaiana-18.657.802009-July-3
Thylacodes dentiferus-15.935.702009-July-3
Bostrycapulus gravispinosus-17.492.182009-July-3
Clathria echinata-20.133.122009-July-3
Dictyonella funicularis-18.787.002009-July-3
Haliclona tubifera-19.555.612009-July-3
Ulva lactuca-15.535.372009-July-3
SOM (mix<10 um)-18.365.202009-July-3
Map of the northeast coast of Taiwan showing sampling sites: A (White vent), B (Yellow vent), C (Tail of KS Islet), and D (Dali), modified from Wu et al. (2021). The carbon and n class="Chemical">nitrogen stable isotopic values of all samples from sites of shallow-water hydrothermal vents and non-vent rocky reefs.

Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

Sampling sites

The SV sites included White vent (WV, 24.83404 N, 121.96172 E) and Yellow vent (YV, 24.83553 N, 121.96361 E) (Fig. 1), which are located southeast of KS Islet. At WV, white fluids are emitted from a 2 m wide hole surrounded by rocn class="Chemical">ks. The ambient substrate is sand with deposited sulfur globules (< 0.1 cm in diameter). At YV, the yellow plume is composed of sulfur particles and form massive sulfur balls (> 97 % elemental S) [2]. The two NV sites are rocky reefs [3,4]; one is located southwest of KS Islet (Tail, 24.83404 N, 121.96172 E), and the other is located along the northeast coast of Taiwan (Dali, 24.95743 N, 121.91960 E). The sediment contained no sulfur globules at the Tail site. The Tail is located approximately 3 km away from the SV study sites and around 9 km away from Dali.

Sample collection

Samples from YV and WV have gathered 5 m away from the emitting centers at depths of 7 and 17 m. At Tail and Dali, samples were collected between 7 to 17 m. The sampling periods were July 2009 and July–August 2010 at YV, WV, and Tail. In Dali, it was in July 2009. Sean class="Chemical">water temperature and the depth of sampling sites were obtained from the records of dive computers (Table 1). For the measurements of pH, seawater was sampled with 25 mL sterile centrifuge tubes and determined by a portable pH meter (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). Surface sediments (0–—2 cm) were collected by hands and stored in 50 mL sterile centrifuge tubes for sediment organic matter (SOM) preparation. Zooplankton was obtained by trawling vertically using a North Pacific standard net. Fishes were sampled by line fishing, and macrobenthos was hand-collected by scuba divers. Sessile species, such as sea anemones, Thylacodes snails, and periphyton, were gathered along with their substrates with a chisel and hammer. All samples were put in plastic bags and frozen at -20 °C until sample preparation.

Sample preparation for stable isotope determination

For SOM sample preparation, the collected surface sediments were thawed, ultra-sonicated for 10 min, and then filtered through a ten µm-mesh nylon membrane rinsed with n class="Chemical">phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer. The filtrate was collected as a SOM sample (presumably microbial organisms) then lyophilized for further stable isotope measurements [5]. All collected organisms were identified to the lowest classification level, except for mixed samples (i.e., periphyton, copepods, and zooplankton). Identification of n class="Species">algae was based on external morphology and pigment color [6]. Copepods were the primary components of zooplankton samples (>70%). So copepods were treated as a mixed sample for carbon and nitrogen stable isotopic analysis and listed in Table 1. Debris and epibionts were eliminated from samples before processed. Afterward, samples were rinsed with PBS buffer to avoid the potentially detrimental influence of acidic solutions [7], [8], [9] and distilled n class="Chemical">water in the cleaning process [7,10,11]. The knives and containers used for sample preparation were pre-cleaned by soaking in 1% hydrochloric acid (HCL) solution overnight and washing several times with distilled water. For macroalgae, thallus were used. Sessile organisms were scratched from their substrates with a knife. For large animals, tissue samples were taken from the dorsal muscle of fishes, the abdomen of shrimps, the leg muscle of crabs, and the foot muscle of snails. For small animals, whole samples (sea anemone, sipunculate, and polychaete) or pooled specimens (copepod, Anachis snail) were used. The processed samples were lyophilized and grounded to powder by a pre-cleaned glass mortar and pestle. The powder was placed into 1.5 mL micro-centrifuge tubes. Approximately 1 mg of powder was weighed and encapsulated in a tin capsule, then stored in a 96-well sample collection plate ready for n class="Chemical">carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses.

Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses

Analyses were conducted at the stable isotope laboratory at the University of California at Davis. Samples were combusted at 1020°C then analyzed by a PDZ Europa ANCA-GSL elemental analyzer coupled with a PDZ Europa 20–20 isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Sercon Ltd., Cheshire, UK). Ratios were derived from the equation of δX (‰) = [(Rsample /Rstandard) – 1] × 103. Where X is 13C or n class="Chemical">15N, and R is the corresponding ratio of 13C/12C or 15N/14N. Stable isotope abundances were expressed in conventional delta (δ) notation, and deviations in parts per thousand (‰) relative to the Pee Dee Belemnite and atmospheric N2 standards for carbon and nitrogen, respectively. During analysis, samples were interspersed with several standards from at least two different laboratories (nylon with certified δn class="Chemical">13C and δ15N values of -27.8 and -9.8‰; USGS40, L-glutamic acid with certified δ13C and δ15N values of -28.9 and -4.3‰, respectively). Carbon and nitrogen contents were calculated based on peak area versus sample weight ratio and calibrated with standards. Analytical accuracy was 0.2‰ for δ13C and 0.3‰ for δ15N by comparing measured values (mean ± 1 SD) for the known values of the included laboratory reference materials (e.g., acetanilide). Analytical precision was <0.2‰ for both δ13C and δ15N based on the standard deviation of measurements of internal standards.

Ethics Statement

The authors declare that they have read and follow the ethical requirements for publication in Data in Brief.

CRediT Author Statement

Jing-Ying Wu: Writing, Methodology, Software; Siou-Yan Lin: Performed the experiments and data/evidence collection; Shao-Hung Peng: Visualization, Investigation; Jia-Jang Hung: Supervision, critical review; Chen-Tung Arthur Chen: Supervision, critical review, commentary, and revision for the pre-publication stage; Li-n class="Species">Lian Liu: Conceptualization, reviewing, and editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have or could be perceived to have influenced the work reported in this article.
SubjectEnvironmental science
Specific subject areaMarine ecologyCarbon and nitrogen stable isotope analysis
Type of dataFigure and Table
How data were acquiredThe samples were collected in the field, then lyophilized, and grounded in powder for stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses. Empirical data was measured by an Integra Mass Spectrometer elemental analyzer coupled with a PDZ Europa 20–20 isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Sercon Ltd., Cheshire, UK).
Data formatRaw
Parameters for data collectionSample collection date, latitude (°), longitude (°), temperature (°C), pH, depth (m), carbon stable isotope ratio (‰), and nitrogen stable isotope ratio (‰).
Description of data collectionThe sampling sites were in northeastern Taiwan, including shallow-water hydrothermal vents (SVs) off Kueishan (KS) Islet and nearby non-vent rocky reefs (NV). Scuba divers collected benthic organisms and surface sediments (0 – 2 cm). Zooplanktons were trawled vertically by a North Pacific standard net. Analyses were conducted at the stable isotope laboratory at the University of California at Davis. Analytical accuracy was 0.2 ‰ for δ13C and 0.3 ‰ for δ15N. Analytical precision based on the standard deviation of replicates of internal standards was < 0.2 ‰ for both δ13C and δ15N.
Data source locationSamples were collected from SV (shallow-water hydrothermal vent) sites and NV (non-vent rocky reef) sites. SV sites were White vent (WV, 24.83404 N, 121.96172 E) and Yellow vent (YV, 24.83553 N, 121.96361 E). NV sites were Tail (24.83404 N, 121.96172 E) and Dali (24.95743 N, 121.91960 E). The samples were analyzed at UC Davis Stable Isotope Facility, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 9516, United States of America.
Data accessibilityWith the article
Related research articleJ.Y. Wu, S.Y. Lin, S.H. Peng, J.J. Hung, C.T.A. Chen, L.L. Liu, Isotopic niche differentiation in benthic consumers from shallow-water hydrothermal vents and nearby non-vent rocky reefs in northeastern Taiwan, Prog. Oceanogr. 195 (2021) 102596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102596.
  4 in total

1.  Stable isotopes and C/N ratios in marine sediments as a tool for discriminating anthropogenic impact.

Authors:  P Rumolo; M Barra; S Gherardi; E Marsella; M Sprovieri
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2011-10-26

2.  Effects of sample preparation on stable isotope ratios of carbon and nitrogen in marine invertebrates: implications for food web studies using stable isotopes.

Authors:  Miguel A Mateo; Oscar Serrano; Laura Serrano; Robert H Michener
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of acidification on carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes of benthic macrofauna from a tropical coral reef.

Authors:  Joanna Kolasinski; Karyne Rogers; Patrick Frouin
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Stable Isotope Resolved Metabolomics Studies in Ex Vivo TIssue Slices.

Authors:  Teresa W-M Fan; Andrew N Lane; Richard M Higashi
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2016-02-05
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Autochthony and isotopic niches of benthic fauna at shallow-water hydrothermal vents.

Authors:  Teng-Wei Wang; Danny C P Lau; Tin-Yam Chan; Benny K K Chan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.996
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.