Literature DB >> 34189153

Outcomes and Risk Factors of Septic Shock in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Juan M Pericàs1,2,3, Marta Hernández-Meneses1,2,3, Patricia Muñoz4,5,6,7, Ana Álvarez-Uría4,5,6,7, Blanca Pinilla-Llorente8, Arístides de Alarcón9,10, Karlos Reviejo11, M Carmen Fariñas12,13, Carlos Falces2,3,14, Josune Goikoetxea-Agirre15, Juan Gálvez-Acebal9,10, Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio16, Eloy Gómez-Nebreda17, Jose M Miro1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the characteristics and impact of septic shock (SS) on the outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE). We aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients with IE presenting with SS and to compare them to those of IE patients with sepsis (Se) and those with neither Se nor SS (no-Se-SS).
METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of 4864 IE patients from 35 Spanish centers (2008 to 2018). Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for SS and mortality.
RESULTS: Septic shock and Se presented in 597 (12.3%) and 559 (11.5%) patients, respectively. Patients with SS were younger and presented significantly higher rates of diabetes, chronic renal and liver disease, transplantation, nosocomial acquisition, Staphylococcus aureus, IE complications, and in-hospital mortality (62.5%, 37.7% for Se and 18.2% for no-Se-SS, P < .001). Staphylococcus aureus (odds ratio [OR], 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-2.81; P < .001), Gram negative (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.25-3.91; P = .006), nosocomial acquisition (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.07-1.94; P = .015), persistent bacteremia (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.24-2.68; P = .002), acute renal failure (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.28-4.01; P < .001), central nervous system emboli (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08-2.01; P = .013), and larger vegetation size (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02; P. = 020) were associated with a higher risk of developing SS. Charlson score, heart failure, persistent bacteremia, acute renal failure, mechanical ventilation, worsening of liver disease, S aureus, and receiving aminoglycosides within the first 24 hours were associated with higher in-hospital mortality, whereas male sex, native valve IE, and cardiac surgery were associated with lower mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Septic shock is frequent and entails dismal prognosis. Early identification of patients at risk of developing SS and early assessment for cardiac surgery appear as key factors to improve outcomes.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus; cardiac surgery; infective endocarditis; sepsis; septic shock

Year:  2021        PMID: 34189153      PMCID: PMC8232381          DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis        ISSN: 2328-8957            Impact factor:   3.835


Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious disease with increasing incidence in Western countries, presenting a high overall mortality (approximately 25%–30%) despite the improvements in cardiac surgery, antibiotic treatment, and diagnostic techniques of recent decades [1-3]. It is likely that the 2 ways to address this are to strengthen prevention measures and to rapidly identify and control risk factors of poor prognosis in patients with IE. Septic shock (SS) is one of the risk factors for mortality in IE that entails poorer prognosis. Septic shock is also increasingly detected worldwide [4, 5]. Although the existing literature shows that IE-associated mortality skyrockets when SS develops, there are some factors conferring a higher risk of developing SS, such as Staphylococcus aureus or diabetes mellitus [6, 7]; multiorgan failure entails dismal prognosis [8, 9], and cardiac surgery might play a key role in improving the prognosis [8-10]. Nonetheless, there are major gaps that still need to be addressed, such as the exact prevalence of SS and sepsis (Se) in IE or the impact of cardiac surgery and its timing on survival. We aimed to investigate the main characteristics of IE presenting with SS and Se in a large Spanish multicenter cohort, to compare them to those of patients without SS and/or Se, and to analyze risk factors for the development of SS as well as risk factors for mortality among patients with SS.

METHODS

Design

This is a multicenter prospective observational study that includes 35 Spanish centers between January 2008 and December 2018.

Patients

This study comprised adult individuals with IE diagnosed according to the modified Duke criteria [11] and receiving full treatment. Patients were allocated to one of the following categories depending on whether they presented Se or SS at any time during the IE episode: no Se/SS (no Se-SS), Se, and SS.

Definitions

The characteristics of the GAMES (Grupos de Apoyo para el Manejo de la Endocarditis en ESpaña) cohort, collection of data variables through a specific central registration depository (CRD), and general definitions are described elsewhere [12, 13]. Sepsis and septic shock developing once patients were admitted to the hospital and occurring before cardiac surgery were prospectively collected in the GAMES CRD by physicians in charge of the Endocarditis Team in each collaborating center according to definitions by international consensus in place [14]. The definition of sepsis was systemic inflammatory response syndrome due to infection with tissue hypoperfusion or organ dysfunction that responded to adequate fluid resuscitation, whereas septic shock was defined as sepsis-induced hypotension persisting despite adequate fluid resuscitation [14]. When a patient had both the boxes for sepsis and septic shock marked as “yes” in the CRD, he or she was assigned to the septic shock category. Cardiac surgery was considered (1) emergent when performed on the same day as the surgery indication and (2) urgent when taking place during the following 24 hours. Persistent bacteremia was defined as persistence of positive blood cultures after 7 days of appropriate antibiotic treatment initiation. The length of antibiotic treatment was calculated both for all patients and only for those patients surviving the initial IE admission. Patients receiving either 3 mg/kg per day gentamicin or ≥1000 mg/day amikacin as either empirical or directed antibiotic treatment for IE during the first 24 hours were considered to have received an early high dose of aminoglycosides, which are frequently used as combination therapy in Se/SS according to guidelines [15].

Outcomes

Outcomes were as follows: development of septic shock during the index IE episode; in-hospital and 1-year mortality (death due to any causes during the initial admission and 365 days from the date of admission, respectively); and relapses (new episode of IE caused by the same microorganism within 6 months of the initial episode).

Patient Consent Statement

The design of the work has been approved by local ethical committees of sites participating in the GAMES cohort.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were summarized as percentages, and continuous variables were summarized as means and standard deviations. Categorical variables were compared using the χ 2 test (or Fisher’s exact test, where applicable). Continuous variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to investigate risk factors for the development of septic shock and hospital and 1-year mortality. Variables with P < .20 in the univariate analysis were included in the models (see selected variables in Supplementary Material A). The goodness of fit of the final multivariate model was assessed again by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Analysis of covariance using the Pearson correlation test or Spearman’s rho was carried out to explore the relationship between sepsis/septic shock and IE caused by S aureus, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve free of mortality at 1 year was generated with log-rank test analysis and considering censored episodes according to the time measured for each endpoint. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2018, 597 patients developed SS (12.3%) and 559 patients developed Se (11.5%) during the IE episode of the 4864 patients included in the GAMES cohort during this period. Patients with SS were significantly younger than those in the no-Se-SS group (Table 1). Patients both from the SS and Se group had significantly higher frequencies of several comorbidities, remarkably more chronic liver and kidney disease, than those of the no-Se-SS group. Native valve IE was significantly more common among patients with SS and Se, whereas CIED involvement was more frequent in no-Se-SS patients. The mitral valve was more frequently involved in the SS and the Se groups than in the no-Se-SS group. Community acquisition of the infection was significantly less frequent, whereas nosocomial acquisition was more common among patients with SS. Staphylococcus aureus as causative agent of IE was significantly more common in the SS and Se groups, whereas streptococci were overall less frequent. Coagulase-negative staphylococci were overall significantly less frequently the causative microorganisms of IE in the SS group. Culture-negative IE was significantly less frequent in the Se group. Enterococci, particularly Enterococcus faecalis, caused IE less frequently in both the SS and the Se groups. An analysis of covariance showed a significant positive correlation between both SS and Se and S aureus etiology (Supplementary Material B). Patients with SS with IE caused by S aureus presented higher rates of mitral and pulmonic valve involvement, definite IE, nosocomial acquisition, persistent bacteremia, central nervous system (CNS) emboli, pulmonary emboli, surgical risk scores, and in-hospital and 1-year mortality than patients with SS and IE not caused by S aureus, whereas the latter had higher rates of aortic valve involvement, moderate-severe aortic regurgitation, intracardiac complications, and cardiac surgery, both emergent and elective (Supplementary Table 1).
Table 1.

Comparison of Epidemiological and Etiological Characteristics and Type of Endocarditis Among Infective Endocarditis Episodes From the GAMES Cohort (2008–2018) According to the Presence of Sepsis and Septic Shock

VariablesNo Sepsis-No Septic Shock (N = 3708)Sepsis (N = 559)Septic Shock (N = 597) P
Median age, years (IQR) 69 (57–77)68 (56–78)66 (55–76).042a
Male sex (%) 2530 (68.2)348 (62.2)391 (65.4).277
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus1035 (27.9)166 (29.7)194 (32.5).024a
Chronic lung disease685 (18.4)124 (22.1)114 (19.0).042a
Ischemic cardiomyopathy1017 (27.4)145 (25.9)161 (26.9).492
Congestive heart failure1240 (33.4)199 (35.9)219 (36.6).131
Moderate/severe liver disease132 (3.5)31 (5.5)38 (6.3).030a
Moderate/severe chronic renal failure500 (13.4)116 (20.7)126 (21.1)<.001a
Hemodialysis148 (3.9)37 (6.6)45 (7.5)<.001a
Neoplasm563 (15.1)94 (16.8)101 (16.9).304
Transplantation66 (1.8)8 (1.4)25 (4.2).003a
Immunosuppressant therapy202 (5.4)34 (6.0)40 (6.7).608
IV drug use80 (2.1)18 (3.2)14 (2.3).418
HIV60 (1.6)15 (2.6)12 (2.0).141
Previous IE295 (8.0)37 (6.6)39 (6.5).303
Congenital cardiac abnormality249 (6.7)32 (5.7)26 (4.3).035a
Natural valve disease1653 (44.5)287 (51.3)248 (41.5).003a
Median age-adjusted Charlson score (IQR)5 (3–7)5 (3–7)5 (3–7).200
Type of Endocarditis
Native2204 (59.4)360 (64.4)391 (65.5).028a
Prosthetic1153 (31.1)178 (29.8)166 (29.7).690
CIEDb410 (11.1)49 (8.8)41 (6.9).002a
Valve involvementc
Aortic1934 (52.2)233 (41.7)299 (50.1)<.001a
Mitral1498 (40.4)273 (48.8)286 (47.9)<.001a
Tricuspid183 (4.9)45 (8.1)39 (6.5).003a
Pulmonary40 (1.1)20 (3.6)12 (2.0)<.001a
Diagnosis of Endocarditis According to Modified Duke Criteria
Definite2886 (77.8)497 (88.9)512 (85.7)<.001a
Possible822 (22.1)62 (11.0)85 (14.2)<.001a
IE Acquisition
Community2253 (60.7)343 (61.3)317 (53.1).005a
Healthcare Associated
-Nosocomial1023 (27.5)159 (28.4)225 (37.6)<.001a
-Non-nosocomial healthcare associated310 (8.3)45 (8.0)40 (6.7).197
Unknown122 (3.2)12 (2.1)15 (2.5).397
Causative Microorganisms
Staphylococcus aureus 625 (16.9)215 (38.5)255 (42.7)<.001a
Streptococci1057 (28.5)94 (16.8)91 (15.2)<.001a
Viridans group417 (11.2)24 (4.3)24 (4.0)<.001a
Group B (Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus dysgalactiae)81 (2.2)18 (3.2)22 (3.7).009a
Streptococcus pneumoniae29 (0.8)10 (1.8)5 (0.8).063
Streptococcus pyogenes7 (0.2)1 (0.2)2 (0.3).757
Bovis group streptococci272 (7.3)19 (3.4)15 (2.5).008a
Other251 (6.7)22 (3.9)23 (3.8).013a
Coagulase-negative staphylococci673 (18.1)101 (18.1)79 (13.2).028a
Staphylococcus lugdunensis 27 (0.7)12 (2.1)6 (1.0).002a
Staphylococcus capitis 29 (0.8)1 (0.2)3 (0.5).230
Other617 (16.6)88 (15.7)70 (11.7).002a
Enterococci580 (15.6)51 (9.1)51 (8.5).001a
Enterococcus faecalis535 (14.4)47 (8.4)43 (7.2).001a
Enterococcus faecium35 (0.9)4 (0.7)7 (0.1).725
Other10 (0.2)01 (0.1).982
Gram negative145 (3.9)27 (4.8)34 (5.7).101
Fungi62 (1.7)19 (3.4)15 (2.5).008a
Candida spp 54 (1.5)17 (3.0)14 (2.3).010a
Other8 (0.2)2 (0.4)1 (0.2).764
Other861 (23.2)240 (42.9)276 (46.2)<.001a
No etiological diagnosis330 (8.9)27 (4.8)51 (8.5).002a

Abbreviations: CIED, cardiac implanted electronic device; HIV, human immunodeficiency syndrome; IE, infective endocarditis; IQR, interquartile range; IV, intravenous; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S aureus.

aStatistically significant difference between columns 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 1 and 3, respectively.

bOnly episodes in which only CIED are affected are included in this group. Episodes have been classified as native or prosthetic valve where a concomitant valve involvement exists.

cThe sum does not equal 100% because episodes with multivalve involvement are also counted.

Comparison of Epidemiological and Etiological Characteristics and Type of Endocarditis Among Infective Endocarditis Episodes From the GAMES Cohort (2008–2018) According to the Presence of Sepsis and Septic Shock Abbreviations: CIED, cardiac implanted electronic device; HIV, human immunodeficiency syndrome; IE, infective endocarditis; IQR, interquartile range; IV, intravenous; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S aureus. aStatistically significant difference between columns 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 1 and 3, respectively. bOnly episodes in which only CIED are affected are included in this group. Episodes have been classified as native or prosthetic valve where a concomitant valve involvement exists. cThe sum does not equal 100% because episodes with multivalve involvement are also counted. Patients with SS and Se presented significantly more clinical and echocardiographic complications than patients within the no-Se-SS group overall (Table 2). In some cases, the complications were significantly higher also in the SS compared to the Se group, eg, new onset or worsening heart failure (which also positively correlated to the existence of prior chronic heart failure as shown in Supplementary Material B), use of intra-aortic balloon or ventricular-assist devices, mechanical ventilation, and acute renal failure. The median length of antibiotic treatment was shorter overall in SS but longer compared to no-Se-SS when survivors to the IE episode were analyzed. No significant differences between groups were found regarding the overall rates of cardiac surgery during the initial admission. Emergent surgery was significantly more frequent in patients with SS than in the other 2 groups. In-hospital and 1-year mortality were significantly higher in the SS group than in the other 2 groups, whereas deaths occurring after discharge were significantly less frequent in the SS group (Supplemental Table 2) than in the Se and no-Se-SS groups. Relapses were significantly higher in the no-Se-SS group.
Table 2.

Comparison of Clinical and Therapeutic Characteristics and Outcomes Among Infective Endocarditis Episodes From the GAMES Cohort (2008–2018) According to the Presence of Sepsis and Septic Shock

VariablesNo Sepsis-No Septic Shock (N = 3708)Sepsis (N = 559)Septic Shock (N = 597) P
Clinical Complications of Endocarditis
New onset or worsening heart failure1254 (33.8)284 (50.8)366 (61.3)<.001a
Persistent bacteremia372 (10.0)91 (16.3)98 (16.4)<.001a
Central nervous system emboli613 (16.5)153 (27.3)195 (32.6)<0.001a
Other major emboli684 (18.4)167 (29.8)156 (26.1)<.001a
Pulmonary emboli148 (3.9)48 (8.5)44 (7.3)<.001a
Vertebral osteomyelitis121 (3.2)21 (3.7)16 (2.6).530
Nonvertebral osteomyelitis53 (1.4)14 (2.5)14 (2.3).133
Renal abscess43 (1.1)15 (2.6)15 (2.5).006a
Splenic abscess115 (3.1)30 (5.3)38 (6.3).008a
Other Complications
Heart conduction abnormality (atrial fibrillation or block) 306 (8.2)71 (12.7)80 (13.4).007a
Ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation or reverted cardiac sudden death 64 (1.7)14 (2.5)32 (5.3).019a
Acute renal failure1038 (27.9)279 (49.9)375 (62.8)<.001a
Intra-aortic balloon or ventricular assist devices26 (0.7)14 (2.5)24 (4.0)<.001a
Mechanical ventilation199 (5.3)85 (15.2)295 (49.1)<.001a
Unstable angina 39 (1.0)26 (4.6)10 (1.6)<.001a
Worsening of prior liver disease62 (1.6)10 (1.8)35 (5.8).006a
Echocardiographic Findings
TEE performed2949 (79.5)420 (75.1)457 (76.5).020a
Median ejection fraction (%, IQR)60 (55–65)60 (55–65)60 (50–65).730
Median vegetation size (mm, IQR)10 (7–16)12 (8–18)12 (8–19)<.001a
Moderate-severe aortic regurgitation1102 (29.7)130 (23.2)168 (28.1).002a
Moderate-severe mitral regurgitation1218 (32.8)231 (41.3)213 (35.6).001a
Perivalvular abscess501 (13.5)139 (24.9)121 (20.3)<.001a
Intracardiac fistula92 (2.4)7 (1.2)16 (2.6).126
Pseudoaneurysm222 (5.9)35 (6.2)29 (4.8).317
Leaflet perforation/rupture463 (12.4)107 (19.1)97 (16.2)<.001a
Treatment Characteristics
Median Length of Antibiotic Treatment, Days (IQR)
• Overall40 (28–45)35 (23–44)27 (11–43)<.001a
• Among survivors of initial episode42 (30–47)42 (32–49)43 (33–54)<.001a
Received high-dose aminoglycosides within the first 24 hours 303 (8.2)34 (6.1)55 (9.2).059
Cardiac Surgery
During admission1728 (46.6)255 (45.6)254 (42.6).179
• Emergent73 (1.9)22 (3.9)62 (10.3)<.001a
• Urgent386 (10.4)67 (11.9)83 (13.9).013a
• Elective1269 (34.2)166 (29.7)109 (18.2)<.001a
After discharge161 (4.3)18 (3.2)11 (1.8).008a
• Within 3 months after discharge70 (43.4)6 (33.3)4 (36.3).565
• 3–12 months71 (44.0)9 (50.0)7 (63.6).344
• >12 months14 (8.9)2 (11.1)0.696
• Unknown6 (3.7)1 (5.5)0.793
Surgical Risk Among Patients Receiving Cardiac Surgery
EuroScore, median (IQR)9 (6–12)9 (7–13)12 (9–15)<.001a
LogEuroScore, median (IQR)15 (6–32)17 (7–37)32 (12–54)<.001a
Patients with surgery indication in whom hemodynamic instability was a criterion to rule out surgery (1030/4864, 21.1%)643168219<.001a
43 (6.6)b30 (17.5)104 (47.4)
Outcomes
In-hospital mortality676 (18.2)211 (37.7)372 (62.3)<.001a
One-year mortality919 (24.7)45 (45.7)18 (65.3).001ª
Relapses62 (1.6)4 (0.7)3 (0.5).046a

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; IV, intravenous; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography.

aStatistically significant difference between columns 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 1 and 3, respectively.

bHemodynamic instability was a factor that combined with the following in these 43 patients: stroke (14%), technical complexity (14%), poor prognosis regardless of cardiac surgery (90%), surgeon refuses (28%), death before surgery (23%), and advanced liver disease (14%).

Comparison of Clinical and Therapeutic Characteristics and Outcomes Among Infective Endocarditis Episodes From the GAMES Cohort (2008–2018) According to the Presence of Sepsis and Septic Shock Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; IV, intravenous; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography. aStatistically significant difference between columns 1 and 2, 2 and 3, and 1 and 3, respectively. bHemodynamic instability was a factor that combined with the following in these 43 patients: stroke (14%), technical complexity (14%), poor prognosis regardless of cardiac surgery (90%), surgeon refuses (28%), death before surgery (23%), and advanced liver disease (14%). In the multivariable model of risk factors associated with the development of SS (Table 3), S aureus, Gram-negative rods, nosocomial acquisition, persistent bacteremia, acute renal failure, CNS emboli, and vegetation size were associated with a higher risk of developing SS, whereas viridans group streptococci and bovis group streptococci were associated to lower risk.
Table 3.

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors to Develop Septic Shocka Among Patients With Infective Endocarditis (N = 4864)

VariablesOR95% CI P
LowerUpper
Nosocomial acquisition of IE1.4451.0751.943.015
Staphylococcus aureus 1.9411.3422.808<.001
Gram negative2.2131.2523.914.006
Bovis group streptococci .290.088.960.043
Viridans group.471.232.954.037
Persistent bacteremia1.8201.2372.677.002
CNS emboli1.4751.0842.008.013
Acute renal failure3.0212.2754.013<.001
Vegetation size 1.0141.0021.026.020

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CNS, central nervous system; IE, infective endocarditis; OR, odds ratio.

aBefore surgery in operated patients.

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors to Develop Septic Shocka Among Patients With Infective Endocarditis (N = 4864) Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CNS, central nervous system; IE, infective endocarditis; OR, odds ratio. aBefore surgery in operated patients. Female sex, age-adjusted Charlson score, new onset of heart failure, persistent bacteremia, acute renal failure, mechanical ventilation, worsening of prior liver disease, S aureus, and administration of aminoglycosides during the first 24 hours were associated to higher in-hospital mortality, whereas (1) native valve IE and (2) cardiac surgery were associated with lower risk of death (Table 4). With regards to 1-year mortality, risk factors were older age, age-adjusted Charlson score, new onset heart failure, acute renal failure, mechanical ventilation, worsening of prior liver disease, and administration of aminoglycosides during the first 24 hours. Factors associated with lower risk of 1-year mortality were the same as those for in-hospital mortality, namely, male sex, native valve IE, and cardiac surgery.
Table 4.

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors For In-Hospital Mortality and 1-Year Mortality Among Patients With Infective Endocarditis And Septic Shock (N = 597)

VariablesIn-Hospital Mortality1-Year Mortality
OR95% CI P OR95% CI P
LowerUpperLowerUpper
Male Sex.643.415.998.049.632.404.989.044
Age 1.011.9961.027.1531.0181.0021.034.030
Age-adjusted Charlson score1.1621.0631.270.0011.1401.0421.248.004
Native.558.351.885.013.537.335.862.010
Aortic.821.5041.337.427.732.4431.207.221
Leaflet perforation/rupture.810.4591.428.466.845.4731.508.568
Perivalvular abscess1.124.6541.932.672.979.5631.700.939
Intracardiac fistula2.247.6068.330.2261.981.5347.346.307
Moderate-severe mitral regurgitation1.462.9252.310.1041.460.9132.335.114
Moderate-severe aortic regurgitation1.440.8432.459.1821.706.9822.965.058
New onset or worsening heart failure1.9821.3003.021.0011.9941.2963.067.002
Persistent bacteremia1.8151.0183.236.0431.764.9743.194.061
CNS emboli1.121.7201.745.6131.055.6721.657.816
Other major emboli.612.3721.008.054.714.4291.188.195
Heart conduction abnormality 1.415.7512.664.2831.404.7282.708.312
Acute renal failure2.0111.3173.069.0011.8921.2322.906.004
Ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation1.379.4783.979.5521.615.5175.039.409
Mechanical ventilation2.3611.5483.602<.0012.2511.4613.469<.001
Intra-aortic balloon or ventricular-assist devices4.8481.45616.138.0104.3141.28814.448.018
Unstable angina 1.097.2405.011.9051.755.3179.708.519
Worsening of prior liver disease2.7431.0727.018.0354.7711.59614.264.005
Renal abscess1.445.3216.502.6321.327.2866.153.718
Splenic abscess.960.3462.664.937.860.2952.505.782
Staphylococcus aureus 1.6661.0902.546.0181.479.9612.276.076
Nosocomial acquisition of IE.963.6251.481.8621.067.6871.658.772
Cardiac surgery.417.268.649<.001.383.244.601<.001
Aminoglycosides first 24 hours2.6911.2915.607.0082.6361.2375.617.012

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CNS, central nervous system; IE, infective endocarditis; OR, odds ratio.

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors For In-Hospital Mortality and 1-Year Mortality Among Patients With Infective Endocarditis And Septic Shock (N = 597) Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CNS, central nervous system; IE, infective endocarditis; OR, odds ratio. Survival was significantly lower over time up to 1 year after admission for SS compared to the other 2 groups and for Se compared to those patients without either Se or SS (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves at 1 year.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves at 1 year.

DISCUSSION

The major findings of our study encompass a relatively high frequency of SS among patients with IE, approximately two thirds of whom died; SS affects patients with certain distinct baseline conditions and increased risk being associated to the etiology (S aureus, Gram negative), nosocomial acquisition, large vegetation size, and the development of complications (persistent bacteremia, acute renal failure, and CNS emboli), and therefore early identification of patients at higher risk is possible; and lastly, cardiac surgery was performed in 43% of patients with SS, mostly as emergent surgery, and was associated with lower mortality. Staphylococcus aureus was the main causative agent among patients with IE presenting SS, which is consistent with the findings in the Olmos et al [6] study. Approximately 4 of 10 cases of IE presenting with SS were acquired nosocomially, which should raise a flag for improving prevention measures given the high associated mortality. Special attention should be placed on avoiding catheter-related bacteremia and early prosthetic valve IE. Septic shock was associated with several complications of IE such as multiorgan involvement (ie, renal, liver and respiratory failure), emboli, and abscesses. It is interesting to note that it was also associated with a worsening of previous congestive heart failure and with new onset heart failure, although SS patients less frequently presented severe valve regurgitation. Given that mortality associated with SS was found to be much higher than that with Se, the conclusion from the clinical standpoint is to address sepsis promptly and correctly in its early phase according to the guidelines in place [15] to contain the inflammatory cascade that leads to Se and SS and ultimately to multiorgan failure and death. Nonetheless, the management of sepsis through the use of abundant intravenous fluids besides the administration of antibiotics might be challenging due to the risk of fluid overload and secondary development of heart failure. Furthermore, and closely related to the previous point, patients at a higher risk of developing SS should be rapidly identified. According to our results, factors such as transplantation, chronic liver disease, aortic valve involvement, potential nosocomial acquisition, and causative agents (S aureus and Gram negative bacilli) might help raise awareness in the early approach to the patients, whereas other predictors such as persistent bacteremia, CNS emboli, a large vegetation size, or acute renal failure are probably detected too late to improve the prognosis in most cases. The rapid identification of patients and their transfer to reference centers for cardiac surgery when necessary, and the establishment of endocarditis teams in both reference tertiary centers and second-level hospitals are of special relevance, because cardiac surgery appears to be effective in improving the overall prognosis of patients with IE and SS. It is well known that multiorgan failure and septic shock are major reasons for cardiac surgeons to refuse surgery, because both have a large impact in the calculation of surgical risk irrespective of the risk score used [16]. However, 42.6% of patients with SS in our cohort received cardiac surgery during their admission, more than half of whom were operated on within 48 hours. The rapid decision making and readiness for cardiac surgery in IE, and the surgical expertise in such a relatively complex and infrequent entity such as IE, largely relies on the existence of a highly cohesive group of health professionals [17-19]. Also, it should be noted that surgery in IE is not limited to valvular surgery but also encompasses the removal of the source infection from other locations such as the spleen or the spine, which is directly related to the risk of persistent bacteremia. Therefore, alignment with other surgical teams is also crucial. Concerning follow-up and medium term prognosis, survivors of IE presenting with SS showed lower mortality rates from discharge up to 1 year. The observed lower rate of relapse is probably related to the lower number of patients at risk due to the high in-hospital mortality. Hence, there were no findings in our study suggesting that patients surviving an episode of IE with SS should be followed-up differently than other patients. Our study has some limitations. The definition of “severe sepsis” and “sepsis” changed during the study period [14, 20], and this might have affected how treating physicians collected this information. However, the definition in the GAMES CRD did not change, and in all cases this did not affect how information on SS was gathered. Some relevant information such as the exact resuscitation measures applied was not collected. Another gap in data is the severity scores used in the clinical approach to Se and SS such as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). Moreover, a bias of reference is likely to influence our results, because the bulk of data from patients with SS comes from reference centers for cardiac surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, SS is a relatively common complication of IE. Younger ages, high rates of diabetes mellitus, transplantation, chronic renal and liver disease, aortic involvement, nosocomial acquisition, and S aureus etiology are foremost features of patients with IE developing SS. Septic shock is also associated with many complications related to IE and a very high mortality. Noticeably, cardiac surgery was associated with improved outcomes. Patients with risk factors for developing SS should be rapidly identified and monitored and considered for transfer to reference centers. Moreover, signs of sepsis in IE should be detected and managed accordingly to avoid progression to SS. If hemodynamics degenerate or the IE is diagnosed already with SS in course, early surgery should be considered.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary materials are available at Open Forum Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author. Click here for additional data file.
  20 in total

1.  The infective endocarditis team: recommendations from an international working group.

Authors:  John Chambers; Jonathan Sandoe; Simon Ray; Bernard Prendergast; David Taggart; Stephen Westaby; Chris Arden; Lucy Grothier; Jo Wilson; Brian Campbell; Christa Gohlke-Bärwolf; Carlos A Mestres; Raphael Rosenhek; Philippe Pibarot; Catherine Otto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Derek C Angus; Tom van der Poll
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Clinical practice. Infective endocarditis.

Authors:  Bruno Hoen; Xavier Duval
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A Contemporary Picture of Enterococcal Endocarditis.

Authors:  Juan M Pericàs; Jaume Llopis; Patricia Muñoz; Juan Gálvez-Acebal; Martha Kestler; Maricela Valerio; Marta Hernández-Meneses; Miguel Á Goenaga; Manuel Cobo-Belaustegui; Miguel Montejo; Guillermo Ojeda-Burgos; M Dolores Sousa-Regueiro; Arístides de Alarcón; Antonio Ramos-Martínez; José M Miró
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Bugs at the operating theatre in infective endocarditis: one step forward, still a long way to go.

Authors:  Juan M Pericàs; Eduard Quintana; José M Miró
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Management Considerations in Infective Endocarditis: A Review.

Authors:  Andrew Wang; Jeffrey G Gaca; Vivian H Chu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Contemporary epidemiology and prognosis of septic shock in infective endocarditis.

Authors:  Carmen Olmos; Isidre Vilacosta; Cristina Fernández; Javier López; Cristina Sarriá; Carlos Ferrera; Ana Revilla; Jacobo Silva; David Vivas; Isabel González; José Alberto San Román
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Infective endocarditis requiring ICU admission: epidemiology and prognosis.

Authors:  Olivier Leroy; Hugues Georges; Patrick Devos; Steve Bitton; Nathalie De Sa; Céline Dedrie; Sébastien Beague; Pierre Ducq; Claire Boulle-Geronimi; Damien Thellier; Fabienne Saulnier; Sebastien Preau
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 6.925

10.  Impact of Setting up an "Endocarditis Team" on the Management of Infective Endocarditis.

Authors:  Yvon Ruch; Jean-Philippe Mazzucotelli; François Lefebvre; Aurélie Martin; Nicolas Lefebvre; Nawal Douiri; Philippe Riegel; Tam Hoang Minh; Hélène Petit-Eisenmann; Yves Hansmann; Xavier Argemi
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.835

View more
  1 in total

1.  Incidence and risk factors for mortality in patients treated with combined ceftaroline for Gram-positive infective endocarditis.

Authors:  D Brandariz-Núñez; J Suanzes; J M Gutiérrez-Urbón; C Fernández-Oliveira; L Margusino; I Martín-Herranz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.267

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.