| Literature DB >> 34189137 |
Qun Lan1, Yingyu Xie1, Jiahua Pan1, Qiaohui Chen1, Tianfang Xiao1, Shaoming Fang1.
Abstract
In the present study, we hypothesized that buckwheat honey (BH) should be regarded as a potential alternative to antibacterial and antioxidant agent in liquid storage of boar semen. To this end, boar semen was firstly studied for in vitro dose tolerability to BH by measuring sperm progressive motility. The optimum progressive motility of boar spermatozoa was observed in extender with 0.5% and 0.6% BH addition. Afterward, sperm quality parameters, bacterial profile and composition, total antioxidant (T-AOC), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels of control, BH supplementation, antibiotics supplementation, and incorporated supplementation were compared during liquid storage period, to further investigate antibacterial and antioxidant properties of BH. The results showed that BH supplementation significantly improved sperm motility, acrosome integrity, plasma membrane integrity, inhibited opportunistic bacterial growth, and altered microbial compositions at the end of preservation. Additionally, T-AOC, SOD, and CAT levels were significantly higher in the BH supplementation group than those in the control and antibiotic supplementation group, whereas MDA level exhibited opposite change pattern. Importantly, BH addition to the extender was able to exert a synergistic effect in combination of antibiotic use. Our findings suggested that the appropriate concentrations (0.5% and 0.6%) of BH were added to the extender could act antibacterial and antioxidant roles in liquid preservation of boar semen.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34189137 PMCID: PMC8192209 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5573237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Dose tolerability of boar spermatozoa to different concentrations of BH and alternations in sperm quality parameters during liquid preservation in different extenders. (a) In vitro dose tolerability of boar semen to different concentrations of BH in terms of sperm progressive motility (mean ± SD). (b) Sperm motility in different extenders. (c) Plasma membrane integrity in different extenders. (d) Acrosome integrity in different extenders. Bars with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05). Cont: control group; E1 (BTS +0.6 g penicillin and 1 g streptomycin); E2 (BTS+0.25% BH +0.3 g penicillin and 0.5 g streptomycin); E3 (BTS+0.3% BH+0.3 g penicillin and 0.5 g streptomycin); E4 (BTS+0.5% BH); E5 (BTS+0.6% BH).
Figure 2Differences in T-AOC level (a), CAT level (b), SOD level (c), and MDA level (d) among different extenders (mean ± SD). Bars with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05). Cont: control group; E1 (BTS +0.6 g penicillin and 1 g streptomycin); E2 (BTS+0.25% BH +0.3 g penicillin and 0.5 g streptomycin); E3 (BTS+0.3% BH+0.3 g penicillin and 0.5 g streptomycin); E4 (BTS+0.5% BH); E5 (BTS+0.6% BH).
Figure 3Differences in bacterial concentrations and compositions in different extenders. (a) Bacterial concentration (mean ± SD). (b) Bacterial composition at the phylum level. (c) Bacterial composition at genus level. (d) LEfSe analysis by using relative abundances of OTUs with LDA score > 2.0 (p < 0.05). Different superscripts differed significantly (p < 0.05). Cont: control group; E1 (BTS +0.6 g penicillin and 1 g streptomycin); E2 (BTS+0.25% BH +0.3 g penicillin and 0.5 g streptomycin); E3 (BTS+0.3% BH+0.3 g penicillin and 0.5 g streptomycin); E4 (BTS+0.5% BH); E5 (BTS+0.6% BH).