| Literature DB >> 34189058 |
Ajay Singh Yadav1, Garima Pandey2, Tarun Kumar Arora3, Pavan Kumar Chaubey4.
Abstract
In this paper, the determined economic impact of the Medicine industry of the Coronavirus pandemic for aggravating items with a ramp-type demand with inflation effects in two-warehouse storage devices and wastewater treatment cost using PSO is developed. The owned warehouse has a fixed capacity of W units; rented warehouse has unlimited capacity. Here, we hypothesized that the Block chain Economic Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic Medicine Industry in Inventory Cost of Inventory in RW is greater than that in OW using PSO. The shortcomings of the economic impact of the Coronavirus pandemic Medicine industry are allowed and partially lagged behind, and it is assumed that Block chain's economic impact of the Coronavirus medicine pandemic industry decreases over time with a variable deterioration rate and wastewater treatment cost using PSO. The effect of inflation was also considered due to the different costs associated with Blockchain applying the Economic Impact of the Coronavirus Medicine Industry Inventory System and wastewater treatment cost using PSO. The numerical sample is also used to study the behavior of the model using particle size optimization. The cost minimization technique is used to obtain expressions for total costs and other parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Block-chain; Deteriorating items; Inflation; Inventory model; Ramp-type demand; Recycle Cost and PSO; Two-warehouse; Wastewater treatment cost
Year: 2021 PMID: 34189058 PMCID: PMC8221907 DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Today Proc ISSN: 2214-7853
Fig. 1Graphical representation of Pollution load of parameters analyzed in Medicine industry wastewater.
Fig. 2Graphical representation of Data of reported Medicine industry wastewater characteristics.
Fig. 3Graphical representation of convexity for PSO.
The parameter is holding cost in RW.
| 30 | 0.3732 | 3.4993 | 0.0866 | 3492.72 |
| 27.5 | 0.3859 | 3.5002 | 0.0863 | 3490.43 |
| 22.5 | 0.4369 | 3.5029 | 0.0856 | 3485.08 |
| 20 | 0.4362 | 3.6668 | 0.0853 | 3475.85 |
The parameter is holding cost in OW.
| 24 | 0.4535 | 3.5220 | 0.3370 | 3896.03 |
| 22 | 0.4268 | 3.5323 | 0.3336 | 3692.90 |
| 38 | 0.3734 | 3.4894 | 0.0607 | 3280.54 |
| 36 | 0.3393 | 3.4756 | 0.0338 | 3070.75 |
The parameter is Shortage cost.
| 320 | 0.4008 | 3.5002 | 0.0863 | 3492.90 |
| 330 | 0.4033 | 3.4989 | 0.0866 | 3490.39 |
| 90 | 0.3998 | 3.5027 | 0.0857 | 3485.38 |
| 80 | 0.3993 | 3.5040 | 0.0853 | 3482.87 |
The parameter is Opportunity cost.
| 32 | 0.2535 | 3.4328 | 0.0024 | 838.953 |
| 33 | 0.3307 | 3.4653 | 0.0448 | 3385.25 |
| 9 | 0.4636 | 3.5402 | 0.3262 | 3809.35 |
| 8 | 0.5224 | 3.5807 | 0.3655 | 2032.73 |
The parameter is Deteriorated cost.
| 30 | 0.4006 | 3.5009 | 0.0738 | 3489.38 |
| 27.5 | 0.4005 | 3.5032 | 0.0782 | 3488.56 |
| 22.5 | 0.4002 | 3.5039 | 0.0954 | 3487.06 |
| 20 | 0.3999 | 3.5024 | 0.3072 | 3486.04 |
The Scan the QR code cost.
| 420 | 0.4556 | 4.5297 | 0.4396 | 4937.06 |
| 430 | 0.4289 | 4.5364 | 0.4329 | 4703.62 |
| 40 | 0.4690 | 4.4854 | 0.4587 | 4269.66 |
| 50 | 0.4342 | 0.4649 | 0.4333 | 4048.43 |
The Efficient recall Maintenance cost.
| 520 | 0.5556 | 5.5297 | 0.5396 | 5937.06 |
| 530 | 0.5289 | 5.5364 | 0.5329 | 5703.62 |
| 50 | 0.5690 | 5.4854 | 0.5587 | 5269.66 |
| 60 | 0.5342 | 5.4649 | 0.5333 | 5048.43 |
The Wastewater treatment cost.
| 620 | 0.6556 | 6.5297 | 0.6396 | 6937.06 |
| 630 | 0.6289 | 6.5364 | 0.6329 | 6703.62 |
| 60 | 0.6690 | 6.4854 | 0.6587 | 6269.66 |
| 50 | 0.6342 | 6.4649 | 0.6333 | 6048.43 |
Chemical cost in use wastewater treatment.
| 720 | 0.4556 | 7.5297 | 0.7396 | 7937.06 |
| 730 | 0.7289 | 7.5364 | 0.7329 | 7703.62 |
| 70 | 0.7690 | 7.4854 | 0.7587 | 7269.66 |
| 60 | 0.7342 | 7.4649 | 0.7333 | 7048.43 |
The Recycle cost.
| 820 | 0.8556 | 8.5297 | 0.8396 | 8937.06 |
| 830 | 0.8289 | 8.5364 | 0.8329 | 8703.62 |
| 80 | 0.8690 | 8.4854 | 0.8587 | 8269.66 |
| 70 | 0.8342 | 8.4649 | 0.8333 | 8048.43 |
Sensitivity analysis with PSO.
| Function | Algorithm | Best | Worst | Mean | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSO | 0.16488 | 19.4764 | 10.6807 | 013,436 | |
| PSO | 0.17477 | 10.7060 | 14.0498 | 017,604 | |
| PSO | 0.17468 | 10.6809 | 14.0600 | 017,570 | |
| PSO | 0.17605 | 13.0333 | 13.6067 | 018,080 | |
| PSO | 0.10073 | 18.6083 | 10.7003 | 010,730 |
Data of reported Medicine industry wastewater characteristics.
| WW | % change in Mg/l | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Min | Max | Standard deviation | Mean |
| pH | 12.4 | 52.4 | 12.42 | 32.48 |
| EC | 12.25 | 52.25 | 12.252 | 32.257 |
| Total solids | 124.3 | 524.3 | 124.32 | 324.37 |
| Total volatile solids | 124.5 | 524.5 | 124.52 | 324.545 |
| Suspended solids | 126.7 | 526.7 | 126.78 | 326.777 |
| Total sugars | 125.2 | 525.2 | 125.26 | 325.27 |
| Citric acid | 129.0 | 529.0 | 129.02 | 329.04 |
| Tartaric acid | 128.2 | 528.2 | 128.25 | 328.27 |
| Malic acid | 124.2 | 524.2 | 124.26 | 324.28 |
| Lactic acid | 127.3 | 527.3 | 127.37 | 327.38 |
| Succinic acid | 12.2 | 52.2 | 12.28 | 32.22 |
| 12.8 | 52.8 | 12.89 | 32.82 | |
| Hexanoic acid | 12.3 | 52.3 | 12.32 | 32.37 |
| Ethyl butyrate | 120.4 | 520.4 | 120.42 | 3204.4 |
Pollution load of parameters analyzed in Medicine industry wastewater.
| Chemical parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Ph | 17.1 |
| Phenlphthalen | 1147 |
| Methyl orange | 122 |
| Chemical oxygen demand | 11,926 |
| Biochemical oxygen demand | 112.8 |
| Phosphate | 115.8 |