| Literature DB >> 34189032 |
Tian Li1, Siyao Wang1, Ke Cheng2, Lu Sun3, Daopeng Jin2, Shen Zhang1, Zhen Yang1, Zouqin Huang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Warm acupuncture, a combination of the mechanical stimulation of acupuncture and thermal stimulation of moxibustion, is commonly used in treating acute low back pain (LBP). This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of stronger (above 43°C) and weaker (above 40°C) heat stimulation in warm acupuncture on the function and pain in patients with acute LBP due to lumbosacral disc degeneration (LDD).Entities:
Keywords: Acupuncture therapy; Heat stimulation; Low back pain; Lumbosacral disc degeneration; Nociception
Year: 2021 PMID: 34189032 PMCID: PMC8217681 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2021.100748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Med Res ISSN: 2213-4220
Fig. 1Flow chart of the study process (adapted from the CONSORT flow chart).
Demographic and Baseline Characteristics of the participants
| Characteristics | SvN group (N = 82) | SSN group (N = 77) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yrs, | 47.01 ± 11.57 | 46.39 ± 12.34 | 0.743 |
| Sex (N) | 0.875 | ||
| male | 32 | 31 | |
| female | 50 | 46 | |
| BMI (kg/m2, | 23.93 ± 3.157 | 24.04 ± 2.92 | 0.817 |
| Duration (wks, median, interquartile range) | 3 (2–6) | 4 (2–6) | 0.417 |
| Occurrence of leg pain (N, %) | 79 (96.3) | 69 (87.3) | 0.095 |
| Affected levels (N, %) | |||
| L2–L3 | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0) | |
| L3–L4 | 40 (48.8) | 32 (41.5) | |
| L4–L5 | 72 (88.8) | 61 (79.2) | |
| L5–S1 | 76 (92.7) | 72 (93.5) | |
| Participants’ expectancy and rationale credibility | |||
| (median, interquartile range) | 21 (8.4–29.6) | 20 (10.4–27.2) | 0.062 |
| mODI (%) | 50 (40–64) | 56 (42–62) | 0.329 |
| Average VAS pain | 7 (7–8) | 7 (6–8) | 0.087 |
| 3 physical signs in JOABPEQ | 4 (3–4) | 4 (3–4) | 0.123 |
BMI, body mass index; JOABPEQ, Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; mODI, modified Oswestry Disability Index; N, number; SD, standard deviation; SvN, silver needle; SSN, stainless-steel filiform needle; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; wks, weeks; yrs, years.
The mODI, VAS pain, and Physical examination score in JOABPEQ of the participants
| Week | SvN group (n = 82) | SSN group (n = 77) | Difference (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mODI (%) | 4 | 8 (2–18) | 30 (20–42) | 18 (14, 23) | <0.001 |
| 16 | 7 (2–18) | 26 (18–42) | 17 (12, 22) | <0.001 | |
| 28 | 10 (2–20) | 26 (18–42) | 16 (11, 20) | <0.001 | |
| Average VAS pain | 4 | 1 (0–2) | 4 (2–5) | 3 (1.6, 2.7) | <0.001 |
| 16 | 1 (0–2) | 4 (2–5) | 2 (1.4, 2.4) | <0.001 | |
| 28 | 1 (0–3) | 4 (2–5) | 3 (1.1, 2.1) | <0.001 | |
| 3 physical signs in JOABPEQ | 4 | 5.5 (5–6) | 5 (5–6) | 0 (0, 1) | 0.024 |
| 16 | 6 (5–6) | 5 (5–6) | 0 (-0.59, 0.02) | 0.081 | |
| 28 | 6 (5–6) | 5 (5–6) | 0 (-0.55, 0.08) | 0.069 |
IQR, interquartile range; JOABPEQ, Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; ODI, Oswestry Disability Index; SvN, silver needle; SSN, stainless-steel needle; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale.