| Literature DB >> 34188867 |
Nan Lin1,2,3, Jacob B Landis4, Yanxia Sun2,5, Xianhan Huang1, Xu Zhang2, Qun Liu6, Huajie Zhang2, Hang Sun1, Hengchang Wang2,5, Tao Deng1.
Abstract
The flora of northern China forms the main part of the Sino-Japanese floristic region and is located in a south-north vegetative transect in East Asia. Phylogeographic studies have demonstrated that an arid belt in this region has promoted divergence of plants in East Asia. However, little is known about how plants that are restricted to the arid belt of flora in northern China respond to climatic oscillation and environmental change. Here, we used genomic-level data of Myripnois dioica across its distribution as a representative of northern China flora to reconstruct plant demographic history, examine local adaptation related to environmental disequilibrium, and investigate the factors related to effective population size change. Our results indicate M. dioica originated from the northern area and expanded to the southern area, with the Taihang Mountains serving as a physical barrier promoting population divergence. Genome-wide evidence found strong correlation between genomic variation and environmental factors, specifically signatures associated with local adaptation to drought stress in heterogeneous environments. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed joint effects of population age, mean temperature of coldest quarter, and precipitation of wettest month on effective population size (Ne). Our current study uses M. dioica as a case for providing new insights into the evolutionary history and local adaptation of northern China flora and provides qualitative strategies for plant conservation.Entities:
Keywords: Myripnois dioica; RAD‐seq; demographic history; effective population size; genomic variations; local adaption
Year: 2021 PMID: 34188867 PMCID: PMC8216978 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
FIGURE 1(a) Geographical distribution of two genomic groups of Myripnois dioica based on ADMIXTURE; populations are color‐coded corresponding to different groups. (b) Plot of individuals of M. dioica along principal component analysis (PCA) scores of genetic variations based on the analysis of 22,868 SNPs; the triangles and dots are consistent with south and north groups. (b) Plots of posterior probabilities for individuals of M. dioica assigned to K genetic clusters from Admixture analyses for K = 2. Population names listed along the bottom of the plot and the south and north groups are delimited by yellow and blue color
Detailed summary statistics per population based on 22,868 restriction site‐associated DNA sequencing SNPs in Myripnois dioica
| Population |
| Pi |
|
|
|
| Population age (Ma) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BA | 5 | 0.0346 | 0.14 | 0.10 | −0.03 | 3.3 (3.2–3.5) | 2.71 |
| FZ | 7 | 0.0348 | 0.21 | 0.17 | −0.05 | 8.0 (7.6–8.5) | 1.38 |
| GSJ | 6 | 0.0346 | 0.18 | 0.13 | −0.07 | 1.9 (1.8–1.9) | 1.02 |
| HH | 3 | 0.0380 | 0.22 | 0.15 | −0.05 | Infinite | 0.41 |
| HX | 5 | 0.0351 | 0.18 | 0.10 | −0.11 | 4.7 (3.9–4.3) | 1.02 |
| HY | 4 | 0.0369 | 0.20 | 0.16 | −0.03 | 15.6 (14.1–17.1) | 0.60 |
| JC | 5 | 0.0378 | 0.19 | 0.15 | −0.05 | 7.0 (6.6–7.3) | 1.17 |
| JH | 5 | 0.0342 | 0.21 | 0.16 | −0.06 | 3.3 (3.2–3.4) | 1.16 |
| JL | 5 | 0.0303 | 0.22 | 0.17 | −0.06 | 4.6 (4.5–4.7) | 1.16 |
| JW | 3 | 0.0384 | 0.22 | 0.15 | −0.04 | 10.6 (9.7–11.5) | 0.41 |
| MF | 5 | 0.0329 | 0.22 | 0.18 | −0.05 | 6.6 (6.3–6.9) | 3.63 |
| QHD | 3 | 0.0341 | 0.20 | 0.16 | −0.01 | Infinite | 0.76 |
| TL | 4 | 0.0356 | 0.21 | 0.16 | −0.05 | 12.7 (11.7–13.8) | 1.49 |
| XS | 5 | 0.0310 | 0.24 | 0.17 | −0.09 | 4.5 (4.4–4.7) | 2.38 |
| YJP | 5 | 0.0320 | 0.22 | 0.17 | −0.04 | 5.6 (5.4–5.8) | 0.60 |
| YX | 7 | 0.0344 | 0.21 | 0.17 | −0.06 | 3.4 (3.3–3.5) | 0.97 |
N, the number of individuals analyzed; Pi, nucleoid diversity; H O, observed heterozygosity; H E, expected heterozygosity; F IS, fixation index; N E (95% CI), effective population size estimates with 95% confidence intervals; population age, divergence time of each population.
FIGURE 2Heatmap of pairwise values among 16 populations of Myripnois dioica based on 22,868 SNPs. Populations from the south and north groups are labeled by yellow and blue color
FIGURE 3(a) The best ABC divergence model for Myripnois dioica based on diy‐abc analyses; (b) Demographic history of the two lineages under the best‐fitting ABC models. Times of population size changes are indicated by horizontal dashed lines
FIGURE 4Correlations between geography, environment, and genetic data. The correlation of mean pairwise geographic distance versus mean pairwise F ST (a), and correlation of mean pairwise environmental distance versus mean pairwise F ST (b)
FIGURE 5(a–e) Cumulative importance of genotype change along the five environmental gradients; (f) R 2‐weighted importance of environmental variables that explain genetic gradients
The optimal general linear models of species factors predicting effective population size Ne
| Model |
|
|---|---|
| Multiple R‐squared | 0.51 |
| Akaike information criterion | 35.46 |
|
| 0.05 |
“*” is corresponding to significant to Ne. Bio11 = mean temperature of coldest quarter; Bio13 = precipitation of wettest month.