Literature DB >> 34188518

Influence of SLCO1B1 521T>C, UGT2B7 802C>T and IMPDH1 -106G>A Genetic Polymorphisms on Mycophenolic Acid Levels and Adverse Reactions in Chinese Autoimmune Disease Patients.

Qing Shu1, Qingqing Fan1, Bingzhu Hua2, Hang Liu1, Shiying Wang2, Yunxing Liu1, Yao Yao1, Han Xie1, Weihong Ge1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a new type of immunosuppressant, has emerged as a frontline agent for treating autoimmune diseases. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an active metabolite of MMF. MPA exposure varies greatly among individuals, which may lead to adverse drug reactions such as gastrointestinal side effects, infection, and leukopenia. Genetic factors play an important role in the variation of MPA levels and its side effects. Although many published studies have focused on MMF use in patients after organ transplant, studies that examine the use of MMF in patients with autoimmune diseases are still lacking.
METHODS: This study will not only explore the genetic factors affecting MPA levels and adverse reactions but also investigate the relationships between UGT1A9 -118(dT)9/10, UGT1A9 - 1818T>C, UGT2B7 802C>T, SLCO1B1 521T>C, SLCO1B3 334T>G, IMPDH1 -106G>A and MPA trough concentration (MPA C0), along with adverse reactions among Chinese patients with autoimmune diseases. A total of 120 patients with autoimmune diseases were recruited. The MPA trough concentration was detected using the enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT). Genotyping was performed using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system and validated allelic discrimination assays. Clinical data were collected for the determination of side effects.
RESULTS: SLCO1B1 521T>C demonstrated a significant association with MPA C0/d (p=0.003), in which patients with the CC type showed a higher MPA C0/d than patients with the TT type (p=0.001) or the CT type (p=0.000). No significant differences were found in MPA C0/d among the other SNPs. IMPDH1 -106G>A was found to be significantly related to infections (p=0.006). Subgroup analysis revealed that UGT2B7 802C>T was significantly related to Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia infection (p=0.036), while SLCO1B1 521T>C was associated with anemia (p=0.029).
CONCLUSION: For Chinese autoimmune disease patients, SLCO1B1 521T>C was correlated with MPA C0/d and anemia. IMPDH1 -106G>A was significantly related to infections. UGT2B7 802C>T was significantly related to Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia infection.
© 2021 Shu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse drug reactions; anemia; autoimmune diseases; gene polymorphisms; infections; mycophenolic acid

Year:  2021        PMID: 34188518      PMCID: PMC8233479          DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S295964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med        ISSN: 1178-7066


Introduction

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new type of immunosuppressant with the active component metabolite mycophenolic acid (MPA). MPA is a selective hypoxanthine single-nucleotide dehydrogenase inhibitor. It blocks the synthesis of guanine nucleotides by inhibiting the activity of inosine-5ʹ-monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) in the purine synthesis pathway, thus inhibiting DNA synthesis. MMF has been widely used as anti-rejection therapy in patients with organ transplant. Because of the efficacy and safety of MMF in organ transplant recipients, increasing emerging evidence suggests the successfulness of utilizing MMF in treating patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjogren’s syndrome, and other autoimmune diseases.1–4 MMF has been widely used because it is well tolerated and safer than other immunosuppressive agents and has fewer toxic side effects. Many studies have confirmed a positive correlation between MPA exposure and efficacy. However, MPA exposure has wide interindividual differences among the same ethnic group.5–8 MPA exposure exhibits large interpatient variation among individuals by approximately 7- to 10-fold, resulting in different degrees of immunosuppression.7 There was broad interindividual variability in clinical efficacy or adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among different individuals under a fixed dose. While insufficient immunosuppression will not achieve a satisfactory treatment effect, excessive immunosuppression might lead to ADRs, such as gastrointestinal side effects, infections, leukopenia, anemia, and low platelet count.9,10 Additionally, there is a wide ethnic variation in the pharmacokinetics of MPA. Compared to Western patients, Asian patients have higher MPA exposure; thus, more adverse events occur in Asian patients when taking fixed-dose MMF. The optimal MMF dose of Asian patients is 20–46% lower than that of Caucasians or African Americans.11,12 Many available research studies are examining the use of MMF in patients with organ transplant. The dosage of MMF in treating patients with autoimmune diseases is much lower than that in patients with organ transplant; thus, more analytic reviews focusing on MMF in patients with autoimmune diseases are needed. It is crucial to gather more evidence to support pharmacokinetic variation to achieve the essential plasma MPA concentration and to avoid potential adverse reactions. Gene polymorphisms of transporters and enzymes are the main factors that affect individual variations in drug exposure. MMF is rapidly absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract after oral administration and transforms to MPA by esterase. MPA undergoes enterohepatic cycling by organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP, encoded by SLCO) and is metabolized into 7-O-glucoside (mycophenolic acid glucuronide, MPAG) and acyl-glucuronide (mycophenolic acid acyl-glucuronide, AcMPAG) through uridine 5ʹ-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT). AcMPAG, a minor metabolite produced by UGT2B7, is highly reactive and thought to be related to potential adverse events.13–15 Gene polymorphisms involved in MPA disposition may also contribute to the interindividual variability of MPA pharmacokinetics. The isoforms that are involved in the distribution, metabolism, and targeting of MPA include UGT1A9, UGT2B7, SLCO1B1, SLCO1B3, and IMPDH.16 Some studies have indicated that UGT1A9-118(dT) 9/10 affects the plasma levels of MPA and MPAG,17,18 while others have come to the opposite conclusion.17–19 Many studies suggest significant differences in the mutation frequencies of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), such as the UGT1A9 −1818T>C, UGT2B7 802C>T, and IMPDH1 −106G>A genotypes, among Asian and European populations. These three SNPs are common genetic variations in the Chinese population. Some gene polymorphisms, such as IMPDH1 −106G>A, are directly related to adverse reactions.20,21 It is clinically significant to investigate the effects of these SNPs on MPA pharmacokinetics and their adverse effects among Chinese patients. Based on previous studies, this study aimed to explore the genetic factors affecting MPA levels and adverse reactions. This study investigated the relationships between the specific SNPs that are associated with the disposition of MMF in Chinese autoimmune disease patients and the MPA level, along with the adverse reactions. SNPs with large differences in frequency between Chinese and Western populations were also investigated.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Drum Tower Hospital (2019-039-01). And this study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. Patients with autoimmune diseases treated with mycophenolate mofetil were recruited from April 2018 to January 2019. Eligibility criteria included (1) diagnosis of autoimmune disease; (2) MMF treatment for at least one week; and (3) improvement after MMF treatment. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with other serious complications, such as severe infection or malignant tumors; and (2) combination use of the following drugs: cyclosporine, tacrolimus, thalidomide, metal-containing drugs, cholestyramine, probenecid, and iron-rich foods or drugs that can affect the absorption and metabolism of MMF. The following dosing regimen was used: the MMF dosage range was 0.5–2 g/day, and the physician selected the appropriate dosage according to the patient’s condition. Other drugs based on the patient’s condition can be combined with glucocorticoids or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). If adverse reactions occurred, after consultation with the physician, MMF was withdrawn or reduced in dosage if necessary.

Sample Collection and Determination of MPA

On the day of the patient’s treatment, 2 mL venous blood was collected in the EDTA anticoagulation tube, 1 mL of the blood was sampled, and centrifuged at 4°C and 50g for 5 min, the supernatant was kept in −80 °C for storage. Enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) was used for detection of steady-state plasma concentration of MPA (MPA C0), refer to the method provided in the kit (6R91945092, Siemens Healthcare diagnostics Inc., USA).

Genotyping

DNA was extracted from venous blood by using genome DNA extraction kit (B518253, Sangon Biotech, Shanghai). Genotypes were assessed for UGT1A9 −118(dT)9/10 (rs3832043), UGT1A9 −1818T>C (rs13418420), UGT2B7 802C>T (rs7439366), SLCO1B1 521T>C (rs4149056), SLCO1B3 334T>G (rs4149117) and IMPDH1 −106G>A (rs2278294) by using a real-time Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) system (Applied Biosystems, USA). Briefly, 1 ng of genomic DNA was mixed with each assay and PCR universal master mix (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai) in a total volume of 20 μL. Thermal cycler parameters included 25 cycles of denaturation at 96°C for 10s, annealing at 50°C for 5s, and extension at 60°C for 4min. The PCR primer sequences is shown in the Table 1.
Table 1

PCR Primer Sequences

SNPsForward Primer FReverse Primer R
rs38320435ʹ ATTTAGGAGGTTAGGAGGTCAGTG 3’5ʹ GGGAATCTAAGCTCCTATGATACAG 3’
rs134184205ʹ AGAAGCCTTACCAATAACAGAAACA 3’5ʹ TCATGAATGGGCACTGAAACTA 3’
rs74393665ʹ GATGTAGCTTAACCTCACAATTCTC 3’5ʹ CATTTCCCATCTTTCTTTCAGTGTA 3’
rs41490565ʹ GGCTTTGCTCTTCCTTCATCT 3’5ʹ ACAAAGGGAAAGTGATCATACAATT 3’
rs41491175ʹ CTCATATAGCCAAATTACCCAAGTG 3’5ʹ GGATAATCAAAATCTTACAGGCAAA 3’
rs22782945ʹ GCTCTGACCACACTTCCCTTCT 3’5ʹ GATGAAGCCCTGTTCAAACTTCT 3’
PCR Primer Sequences

Data Collection and Criteria for Adverse Reactions

The patients’ clinical data were recorded, including (1) demographic information, such as sex, age, and diagnosis; (2) MMF daily dose and the course of treatment; (3) combined medications, ie, glucocorticoids, hydroxychloroquine and proton pump inhibitors; (4) laboratory tests related to adverse reactions of the hematological system, ie, white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin content (Hb), platelet count (PLT); and (5) laboratory tests related to infection, ie, routine urinalysis, including red blood cell count (RBC), WBC count, bacterial examination, cytomegalovirus DNA, Epstein-Barr (EB) virus DNA, fungal glucan (G test), aspergillus test (GM test), the results of sputum culture and drug sensitivity tests. All patients were followed up. MMF-related adverse drug reactions were recorded during the treatment. The criteria for adverse reactions were as follows: Gastrointestinal side effects: diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting occurred due to unknown reasons during medication. Patients without fever and inflammatory diseases became better after the MMF was reduced or discontinued. There was no inducement of the above symptoms, excluding other pathogenic factors. Infection: The occurrence and type of infection were identified by the infection history, infection-related symptoms, laboratory examination, and anti-infectious therapy during hospitalization and follow-up visits after consultation. The types of infection mainly included bacterial infection, fungal infection and viral infection. It was considered infection when patients presented with clinical manifestations of infection, laboratory tests showed evidence of infection, and anti-infective treatment was effective. Adverse reactions of the hematological system: White blood cell count, hemoglobin level, and platelet count before medication were recorded, and the aforementioned conditions were excluded if they were caused by other diseases. Leukopenia: WBC < 4 × 109/L; anemia: Hb < 110 g/L; thrombocytopenia: platelet count < 100 × 109/L; patients improved after reduction or discontinuation.

Data Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 22.0 software. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± SD or median (lower quartile, upper quartile) according to the distribution characteristics. Categorical variables are expressed as percentages. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) test: The χ2 test was used to test the distribution frequencies of genotypes. It was considered that the distribution frequency of genotype conformed to the HWE if p > 0.001, indicating that the included patients were representative of the population. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to determine associations between the genotype and MPA C0. The χ2 test (R×C table) was used to evaluate the effect of genotype on adverse reactions. The difference was considered to be statistically significant when p<0.05.

Results

Patient Characteristics and Genotype Distribution

A total of 120 patients were included in the present study. Eighty-one cases (67.5%) were diagnosed with SLE, 21 cases (17.5%) with SS, and 18 cases (15.0%) with other autoimmune diseases, mainly including vasculitis, myositis/dermatomyositis and scleroderma. The average daily dose of MMF was 1.22 ± 0.48 g. The demographic characteristics are described in Table 2.
Table 2

Demographic Characteristics

Characteristics
Sex (Female, %)104 (86.7%)
Age, years36.61±15.42
Type of autoimmune disease
 Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)81 (67.5%)
 Sjogren’s Syndrome (SS)21 (17.5%)
 Other autoimmune diseases18 (15.0%)
 MMF Dose, g/d1.22±0.48
 Course of treatment, month14±11
Demographic Characteristics The genotype distributions of the SNPs are shown in Table 3. UGT1A9 −118(dT)9/10 (rs3832043) genotyping was performed as follows: 9T: –; 9T10T: -T; 10T: TT. The HWE test was performed on the six SNPs investigated in this study. All the genotype distributions conformed with HWE (p>0.001) without UGT1A9 −118(dT)9/10 (rs3832043) and SLCO1B3 334T>G (rs4149117). Due to the sex difference in the occurrence of autoimmune diseases, the number of female patients was significantly greater than that of male patients, which may be the reason for this result.
Table 3

Genotype Distribution of the SNPs

SNPsMajor/Minor AlleleMajor Allele Homozygotes, n (%)Heterozygote, n (%)Minor Allele Homozygotes, n (%)HWE p
UGT1A9 −118(dT)9/10rs3832043-/T9T (–) 4 (3.33%)9T10T (-T) 103 (85.83%)10T (TT) 13 (10.83%)0.000
UGT1A9 −1818T>Crs13418420T/CTT 33 (27.50%)CT 64 (53.33%)CC 23 (19.17%)0.417
UGT2B7 802C>Trs7439366C/TCC 55 (45.83%)CT 46 (38.33%)TT 15 (19.83%)0.084
SLCO1B1 521T>Crs4149056T/CTT 91 (75.83%)CT 22 (18.33%)CC 7 (5.83%)0.002
SLCO1B3 334T>Grs4149117G/TGG 63 (52.07%)GT 4 (3.31%)TT 54 (44.63%)0.000
IMPDH1 −106G>Ars2278294C/TCC 24 (20.00%)TC 60 (50.00%)TT 36 (30.00%)0.912
Genotype Distribution of the SNPs

The Influence of the SNPs on MPA C0/d

A total of 115 patients who met all the criteria were included. Five patients were excluded due to unqualified MPA C0 results that exceeded the detection limit. In this study, the daily dose of MMF was 0.5–2 g, the median MPA C0 was 1.54 (0.73, 3.29) µg/mL, the lowest was 0.02 µg/mL, and the highest was 15.12 µg/mL. The coefficient of variation (CV) of MPA C0 in 117 patients was 104.0%, which indicated that there were wide individual differences in MPA C0. MPA levels were compared based on different genotypes of SNPs. Every SNP was grouped by genotype into homozygotes of major alleles, heterozygotes, and homozygotes of minor alleles. MPA C0 was dose-normalized to MPA C0/d, thereby eliminating the influence. According to the results, SLCO1B1 521T>C demonstrated a significant association with MPA C0/d (p=0.003). Patients with the CC type showed a higher level of MPA C0/d than those with the TT type (p=0.001), the CT type (p=0.000) and the TT +CT type (p=0.001). Although the difference between the TT type and CT type was not significant (p=0.354), the MPA level in patients with the CC type was higher than that in other patients. A comparison of MPA C0/d between the SLCO1B1 521T>C groups is shown in Figure 1. For UGT1A9 −118(dT)9/10 (rs3832043), UGT1A9 −1818T>C (rs13418420), UGT2B7 802C>T (rs7439366), SLCO1B3 334T>G (rs4149117) and IMPDH1 −106G>A (rs2278294), no significant difference was found in MPA C0/d among these different genotypes. The MPA C0/d values of the different genotypes for each SNP are shown in Table 4.
Figure 1

MPA C0/d values of different genotypes for SLCO1B1 521T>C. MPA concentration (C0/d, ug/mL). TT CT CC: genotype of SLCO1B1 521 T>c.

Table 4

MPA C0/d of Different Genotypes for Each SNP

SNPsMPA C0/d, ug/mLp
Major Allele HomozygotesHeterozygoteMinor Allele Homozygotes
UGT1A9 −118(dT)9/10rs38320439T 0.93 (0.11,-)9T10T 1.45 (0.61,3.27)10T 1.13 (0.54,1.96)0.640
UGT1A9 −1818T>Crs13418420TT 1.16 (0.59,2.66)CT 1.43 (0.65,2.26)CC 1.45 (0.24,4.01)0.888
UGT2B7 802C>Trs7439366CC 1.37 (0.66,2.16)CT 1.80 (0.51,3.81)TT 1.00 (0.58,2.12)0.412
SLCO1B1 521T>Crs4149056TT 1.44 (0.56,2.58)CT 0.90 (0.60,1.53)CC 4.01 (2.48,7.24)0.003*
SLCO1B3 334T>Grs4149117GG 1.42 (0.63,2.26)GT 0.73 (0.70,-)TT 1.45 (0.50,3.49)0.953
IMPDH1 −106G>Ars2278294CC 1.43 (0.52,2.96)TC 1.52 (0.56,3.30)TT 1.29 (0.71,2.58)0.943

Note: *p<0.05.

MPA C0/d of Different Genotypes for Each SNP Note: *p<0.05. MPA C0/d values of different genotypes for SLCO1B1 521T>C. MPA concentration (C0/d, ug/mL). TT CT CC: genotype of SLCO1B1 521 T>c. SLCO1B1 521T>C is associated with MPA C0/d (p=0.003). The MPA levels in patients with the CC type were higher than those in the general population. Patients with the CC type showed a higher MPA C0/d than those with the TT type (p=0.001), the CT type (p=0.000) and the TT +CT type (p=0.001).

Influence of the SNPs on Adverse Reactions

Adverse reactions of MMF mainly include gastrointestinal adverse reactions, infection, and adverse reactions of the hematological system. Detailed information on adverse reactions is shown in Table 5.
Table 5

Occurrence of Adverse Reactions

Types of ADRsn, (%)
Gastrointestinal Side Effects33 (28.2%)
Infections45 (38.5%)
Bacterial Infection38 (32.5%)
Viral Infection7 (6%)
Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia Infection9 (7.7%)
Adverse Reaction of Hematologic System44 (37.6%)
Leukopenia17 (14.5%)
Anemia24 (20.5%)
Decreased Platelet Count18 (15.4%)
Occurrence of Adverse Reactions The occurrence of adverse reactions was grouped to compare the distribution of genotypes among the ADR group and the normal group for each of the SNPs. The results showed that polymorphisms of UGT2B7 802C>T (rs7439366), SLCO1B1 521T>C (rs4149056) and IMPDH1 −106G>A (rs2278294) were correlated with infections and adverse reactions of the hematologic system, and no SNPs were associated with gastrointestinal adverse reactions. The IMPDH1 −106G>A (rs2278294) gene polymorphism was significantly related to infections (p=0.006), and the distribution of the TC type in the infection group was much higher than that of the CC type (51.7% vs 16.7%, p=0.003) and the TT type (51.7% vs 30.6%, p=0.044). Subgroup analysis showed that UGT2B7 802C>T (rs7439366) was significantly related to Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia infection (p=0.036), and the distribution of the CT type in the Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia infection group was significantly higher than that of the CC type (15.2% vs 3.6%, p=0.092). For adverse reactions of the hematologic system, only anemia was affected by gene polymorphisms. The results showed that SLCO1B1 521T>C (rs4149056) was associated with anemia (p=0.029*), and the distribution of the CC type in the anemia group was statistically higher than that of the TT type (57.1% vs 17.6%, p=0.044). The correlations of SNPs and adverse reactions of different genotypes are shown in Table 6.
Table 6

Correlation of SNPs and Adverse Reactions of Different Genotypes

Type of Adverse ReactionSNPsWithout ADRsWith ADRsp
Infectionrs2278294CC 20 (83.3%)CC 4 (16.7%)0.006*
TC 29 (48.3%)TC 31 (51.7%)
TT 25 (69.4%)TT 11 (30.6%)
Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia Infectionrs7439366CC 53 (96.4%)CC 2 (3.6%)0.036*
CT 39 (84.8%)CT 7 (15.2%)
TT 19 (100.0%)TT 0 (0.0%)
Anemiars4149056TT 75 (82.4%)TT 16 (17.6%)0.029*
CT 19 (86.4%)CT 3 (13.6%)
CC 3 (42.9%)CC 4 (57.1%)

Note: *p<0.05.

Correlation of SNPs and Adverse Reactions of Different Genotypes Note: *p<0.05.

Discussion

This study evaluated the impact of UGT1A9 −118(dT)9/10, UGT1A9 −1818T>C, UGT2B7 802C>T, SLCO1B1 521T>C, SLCO1B3 334T>G and IMPDH1 −106G>A on plasma MPA levels and adverse reactions. Based on the limited available information, this study is the first conducted among Chinese patients, specifically focusing on patients with autoimmune diseases. The study results showed a significant association between SLCO1B1 521T>C and MPA C0/d, and the MPA C0/d values were significantly different among different genotypes. In addition, SLCO1B1 521T>C demonstrated positive MMF-induced anemia in Chinese autoimmune patients. IMPDH1-106G>A was correlated with MMF-induced infections, and UGT2B7 802C>T was correlated with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia infection. This study was the first to verify these SNPs among Chinese patients with autoimmune diseases. The results of this study showed that the MPA C0/d values were significantly different among different genotypes in SLCO1B1 521T>C. Among all, the MPA C0/d value of the CC genotype group was significantly higher than those of the TT, CT, and TT + CT groups. Thus, the results of this study suggest that the MPA C0/d for this genotype was higher than that of the general population. This result is different from previous studies. According to Ruiz et al22 SLCO1B1 521T>C was not associated with dose-adjusted plasma MPA levels (C0/d) or adverse reactions in Caucasus transplantation patients. Similar results were obtained by Bouamar et al.23 Although the frequencies of SLCO1B1 521T>C in Europe and East Asia are similar (0.1589 for Europe and 0.1254 for East Asia), the different racial groups were thought to be a contributing factor to the variability in MPA exposure. OATP is mainly distributed in the liver and is involved in the uptake of MPA and MPAG. SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3 gene polymorphisms may affect the metallization of MPA. Studies have shown that MPAG pharmacokinetics are affected by SLCO1B1 and SLCO1B3 polymorphisms.24 Kagaya et al25 indicated that patients with the SLCO1B3 334T>G TT genotype had a higher MPA AUC0-12h. Miura26 concluded that compared to patients with the TT genotype, the bile excretion of MPA in patients with the GG genotype was higher; thus, the MPA AUC6-12h was higher. Patients with the SLCO1B3 334T>G GG type showed higher levels of MPA uptake in hepatocytes and bile excretion. In this study, while SLCO1B3 334T>G did not affect MPA C0/d, SLCO1B1 521T>C affected MPA C0/d. The MPA C0/d of CC patients was significantly higher than those of TT and CT patients, which is thought to be related to the decreased uptake and transportation of MPA by OATP1B1 among CC patients. The decreased MPA in hepatocytes in CC patients subsequently results in decreased OATP1B1 transportation activity in vitro, thus increasing plasma MPA levels. This study found no differences in the MPA C0/d among other SNP genotypes. However, a study indicated that UGT1A9-1818T>C was associated with a low dose-adjusted MPAG AUC0-12 h in Chinese renal transplant patients.19 This is contrary to these research results and requires further investigation. One of the potential contributing factors for the contrary result was thought to be related to the variation in disease types. For MMF-related adverse reactions, SLCO1B1 521T>C, UGT2B7 802C>T, and IMPDH1 −106G>A gene polymorphisms were associated with infections and adverse reactions of the hematologic system. The results of this study did not suggest that SNPs were associated with gastrointestinal side effects. This study demonstrates a strong relationship between MMF-induced anemia and SLCO1B1 521T>C. Although no other available studies confirmed the same result, some studies suggest that SLCO1B1 521T>C is correlated with the risk of leukopenia.27 Bouamar et al found that SLCO1B1 521T>C was not associated with the incidence of diarrhea or leukopenia in MMF-treated renal transplant recipients, which is consistent with the results of this study. OATP1B1 mediates the transport of MPA from blood to hepatocytes, thus reducing the plasma MPA concentration. Michelon28 et al found that the OATP1B1T>C gene polymorphism affected the transportation of MPA, increasing the plasma MPA concentration and thus affecting MMF-related adverse reactions. The proportion of MPA-related ADRs was significantly higher in patients carrying the SLCO1B1 521T allele than in C allele carriers. The SLCO1B1 521C variant allele was found to significantly reduce the probability of MPA-related ADRs. While this study suggested that SLCO1B1521T>C was associated with anemia, Michelon28 et al found that the haplotype tagged by the SLCO1B1 521C allele was associated with a 75% risk reduction of MPA-induced adverse effects. The distribution of the CC type in the anemia group was much higher than that of the TT type. This may be due to the increased transportation of MPA by OATP1B1 before metabolism in TT type patients, resulting in increased MPA in hepatocytes and decreased plasma MPA concentrations. Thus, the incidence of adverse reactions was much lower. The results of this study showed that anemia is not affected by the SLCO1B3 334T>G gene polymorphism, which is consistent with the results of the larger sample reported in Jacobson et al’s study.29 At present, most studies suggest that SLCO1B1 521T> C, SLCO1B3 334T> G and UGT2B7 802C>T are not related to gastrointestinal side effects.26,28,30,31 The above conclusions are consistent with our study. Many studies have indicated that the gastrointestinal side effects of MMF are not related to the plasma level of MPA and that local exposure to MPA in the intestinal epithelium may be the cause of gastrointestinal side effects.32 Khan et al33 identified Midkine as a modulator of tight junction (TJ) permeability in MPA-treated Caco-2 monolayers, which contributed to the mechanism of MMF-related gastrointestinal side effects. However, other studies have come to the opposite conclusion34 that it may be related to the differences in the types and identification of MMF-related gastrointestinal side effects. The definition of MMF-related gastrointestinal side effects should be further clarified. Moreover, the influence of UGT2B7 802C>t, UGT1A9 −1818T>C, and SLCO1B3 T334G on gastrointestinal side effects requires further investigation. The results of this study suggested that IMPDH1-106G>A is correlated with MMF-induced infection. However, according to Ohmann,35 the IMPDH1 −106G>A variant was associated with more serious gastrointestinal side effects. Ohmann et al36 also found that MMF-related gastrointestinal side effects were associated with the IMPDH1 haplotype (containing IMPDH1 −106G>A) in pediatric heart transplant patients. It is hypothesized that IMPDH haplotypes are associated with individual differences in MMF-related adverse reactions. IMPDH is the target enzyme of MPA. High IMPDH activity is related to poor efficacy. Patients with low IMPDH activity need a lower dosage to avoid adverse reactions.37 Research has found that IMPDH gene polymorphisms can affect the occurrence of adverse reactions.35,38,39 Our results showed that the IMPDH1 −106G>A gene polymorphism was significantly associated with infections. The distribution of the TC type in the infected group was significantly higher than that of the CC type (51.7% vs 16.7%) and the TT type (51.7% vs 30.6%), which is thought to be related to the lower IMPDH activity of TC type patients compared to those of CC type and TT type patients. However, some studies have come to the opposite conclusion. Michelon et al28 found that IMPDH1 −106G>A was not related to the adverse reactions of MPA. One study in organ transplant patients found that IMPDH1 −106G>A was associated with the risk of leukopenia in the first year after transplantation.38 Kagaya40 reached the same conclusion. Jacobson et al29 believed that hematological toxicity, such as anemia and leukopenia, was not related to SLCO1B3 gene polymorphism. In this study, IMPDH1-106G>A did not affect leukopenia, which may be due to the influence of AcMPAG and the gene polymorphism affecting AcMPAG metabolism. The exact correlation requires further investigation. Meanwhile, subgroup analysis was conducted based on the different pathogenic microorganisms. The results suggested that UGT2B7 802C>T is correlated with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia infection. UGT2B7 is the main enzyme involved in the formation of AcMPAG, which is believed to be directly related to the adverse reactions of MPA.13,41 Djebli42 found that the 802C>T polymorphism had a significant effect on the production of AcMPAG in vitro. In this study, the UGT2B7 802C>T gene polymorphism was significantly associated with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. However, Pazik et al31 found that the UGT2B7 802C>T allele was not related to infection. The types of infection were not investigated in this study, which may limit the study results. At present, according to the limited information available, no previous studies have focused on SNP and MPA levels or adverse reactions in Chinese autoimmune disease patients. The results of this study indicated a significant association between SLCO1B1 521T>C and MPA C0/d in Chinese autoimmune patients. It is suggested that SLCO1B1 521T>C affects MMF-induced anemia, IMPDH1 −106G>A is correlated with MMF-induced infection, and UGT2B7 802C>T is correlated with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia infection. This study demonstrated the practicality of utilizing these specific SNPs for individualizing MMF dosing. However, some SNPs remain controversial and require further study. This study is limited by its relatively small number of patient samples; a larger sample size is needed to yield stronger research results. In addition, concentration has been described to be a poor indicator of MPA exposure, which is a limitation in this study. MPA concentration is the parameter that is routinely used in the majority of hospitals; therefore, determining the factors involved in the trough concentration is an important research direction.
  42 in total

Review 1.  Mycophenolic acid pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics provide a basis for rational monitoring strategies.

Authors:  Leslie M Shaw; Magdalena Korecka; Raman Venkataramanan; Lee Goldberg; Roy Bloom; Kenneth L Brayman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Development of population PK model with enterohepatic circulation for mycophenolic acid in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Catherine M T Sherwin; Anna Carmela P Sagcal-Gironella; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Hermine I Brunner; Alexander A Vinks
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Associations of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases polymorphisms with mycophenolate mofetil pharmacokinetics in Chinese renal transplant patients.

Authors:  Xiao-chun Xie; Jun Li; Hong-yang Wang; Hong-liang Li; Jing Liu; Qian Fu; Jia-wen Huang; Chen Zhu; Guo-ping Zhong; Xue-ding Wang; Ping-ping Sun; Min Huang; Chang-xi Wang; Jia-li Li
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Correlation of IMPDH1 gene polymorphisms with subclinical acute rejection and mycophenolic acid exposure parameters on day 28 after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Hideaki Kagaya; Masatomo Miura; Mitsuru Saito; Tomonori Habuchi; Shigeru Satoh
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.080

Review 5.  Do Asian renal transplant patients need another mycophenolate mofetil dose compared with Caucasian or African American patients?

Authors:  Pengmei Li; Nauras Shuker; Dennis A Hesselink; Ron H N van Schaik; Xianglin Zhang; Teun van Gelder
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.782

6.  Effect of hepatic drug transporter polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in patients with severe renal dysfunction before renal transplantation.

Authors:  Hideaki Kagaya; Takenori Niioka; Mitsuru Saito; Takamitsu Inoue; Kazuyuki Numakura; Tomonori Habuchi; Shigeru Satoh; Masatomo Miura
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 1.908

7.  Genetic polymorphisms influence mycophenolate mofetil-related adverse events in pediatric heart transplant patients.

Authors:  Erin L Ohmann; Gilbert J Burckart; Maria M Brooks; Yan Chen; Vera Pravica; Diana M Girnita; Adriana Zeevi; Steven A Webber
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Influence of uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferases and ABCC2 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and its metabolites in Chinese renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  W-X Zhang; B Chen; Z Jin; Z Yu; X Wang; H Chen; A Mao; W Cai
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.908

9.  Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in progressive multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Rami Fakih; Marcelo Matiello; Tanuja Chitnis; James M Stankiewicz
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  MPA Modulates Tight Junctions' Permeability via Midkine/PI3K Pathway in Caco-2 Cells: A Possible Mechanism of Leak-Flux Diarrhea in Organ Transplanted Patients.

Authors:  Niamat Khan; Lutz Binder; D V Krishna Pantakani; Abdul R Asif
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Genetic Polymorphisms and the Clinical Response to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment Towards Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Melisa Intan Barliana; Nadiya Nurul Afifah; Riezki Amalia; Laniyati Hamijoyo; Rizky Abdulah
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.810

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.