Chemistry, Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potential of Swertiamarin - A Promising Natural Lead for New Drug Discovery and Development.

Swertiamarin, a seco-iridoid glycoside, is mainly found in Enicostemma littorale Blume (E. littorale) and exhibits therapeutic activities for various diseases. The present study aimed to provide a review of swertiamarin in terms of its phytochemistry, physicochemical properties, biosynthesis, pharmacology and therapeutic potential. Relevant literature was collected from several scientific databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Google Scholar, between 1990 and the present. This review included the distribution of swertiamarin in medicinal plants and its isolation, characterization, physicochemical properties and possible biosynthetic pathways. A comprehensive summary of the pharmacological activities, therapeutic potential and metabolic pathways of swertiamarin was also included after careful screening and tabulation. Based on the reported evidence, swertiamarin meets all five of Lipinski's rules for drug-like properties. Thereafter, the physicochemical properties of swertiamarin were detailed and analyzed. A simple and rapid method for isolating swertiamarin from E. littorale has been described. The present review proposed that swertiamarin may be biosynthesized by the mevalonate or nonmevalonate pathways, followed by the seco-iridoid pathway. It has also been found that swertiamarin is a potent compound with diverse pharmacological activities, including hepatoprotective, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antiarthritis, antidiabetic, antioxidant, neuroprotective and gastroprotective activities. The anticancer activity of swertiamarin against different cancer cell lines has been recently reported. The underlying mechanisms of all these pharmacological effects are diverse and seem to involve the regulation of different molecular targets, including growth factors, inflammatory cytokines, protein kinases, apoptosis-related proteins, receptors and enzymes. Swertiamarin also modulates the activity of several transcription factors, and their signaling pathways in various pathological conditions are also discussed. Moreover, we have highlighted the toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics and possible structural modifications of swertiamarin. The pharmacological activities and therapeutic potential of swertiamarin have been extensively investigated. However, more advanced studies are required including clinical trials and studies on the bioavailability, permeability and administration of safe doses to offer swertiamarin as a novel candidate for future drug development.

Introduction

Natural products obtained from medicinal plants have been investigated in recent years to improve human health by fighting a wide range of diseases. Natural products remain a source of therapeutic agents and have shown beneficial uses. They have a wide variety of multidimensional chemical structures; meanwhile, extensive focus has also been given to the usefulness of natural products as modifiers of biological functions. Intensive work has therefore focused on determining useful natural products for discovering novel therapeutics.1,2

Seco-iridoid glycoside, specifically swertiamarin (Figure 1), has received extensive interest in recent years due to its abundant occurrence in medicinal plants and the fact that it possesses many beneficial pharmacological properties. It is mainly obtained from Enicostemma species that belong to the Gentianaceae family. Compared to other seco-iridoid glycosides isolated from medicinal plants, swertiamarin has been found to possess multifunctional properties, including analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antiarthritis, hepatoprotective, antidiabetic, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer, neuroprotective and gastroprotective properties. Swertiamarin modulates a wide range of molecular targets, including inflammatory cytokines, transcription factors, protein kinases, growth factors, apoptosis-related proteins, receptors, and enzymes and their signaling pathways, in various pathological conditions. Nevertheless, despite conferring numerous beneficial effects, there is no detailed and comprehensive review of swertiamarin to date.

Figure 1

Chemical structure of swertiamarin.

Therefore, in this review, we aimed to conduct a systematic review of swertiamarin with respect to its phytochemical, physicochemical, pharmacological and therapeutic potential, including the cellular and molecular mechanisms of action, and to provide possible biosynthetic pathways.

Methods

Relevant literature was collected from several scientific databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus and Google Scholar. The literature search of the scientific evidence of swertiamarin published since 1990 was achieved using the following keywords: “Swertiamarin” OR “Enicostemma littorale” OR “Enicostemma axillare” OR “Iridoids” OR “Seco-iridoids” AND “Chemistry” OR “Biosynthesis” OR “in vitro” OR “in vivo” OR “Biological studies” OR “Pharmacological studies” OR “Molecular mechanisms” OR “Gene expressions” OR “Toxicity studies” OR “Clinical studies” OR “Pharmacokinetics” OR “Pharmacodynamics”. Studies that were not written in English and did not have any abstracts were excluded from the initial screening. There was no restriction to be followed for collecting the studies carried out on swertiamarin, especially regarding the aspects of dose, route of administration, duration of treatment, or animal versus human studies. The articles were chosen for the final analysis after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and removing duplicates from the databases (Figure 2). The information included in the review was divided into two main categories: phytochemistry and pharmacological properties of swertiamarin. They were further categorized according to the key findings of the study (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6). After a complete screening, the obtained information was summarized and included in the present review. In addition, this review elaborates the molecular mechanisms involved in its pharmacological actions.

Figure 2

Flow chart of the stages of inclusion of studies in the review.

Figure 3

Key findings of swertiamarin included in the review.

Figure 4

MEP pathway for the synthesis of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP).

Figure 5

MVA pathway for the synthesis of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP).

Figure 6

Biosynthetic pathway of swertiamarin (seco-iridoid pathway).

Swertiamarin and Its Phytochemistry

Origin and Distribution of Swertiamarin

Collectively, swertiamarin has been identified and found to be abundant in Enicostemma species (E. littorale).3 This tropical genus is widespread throughout Asia, South America and Africa.4 E. littorale grows in savannas, grasslands, forests and beaches, from wet to very dry climates in many different environments, and it even lives in a very saline climate.4 Swertiamarin is a key component of many crude drugs that are sold in Japan and other countries, and their high swertiamarin content is usually responsible for the effects of these crude drugs.5,6

Apart from E. littorale, swertiamarin also presents in many other plant species, including Centaurium erythraea,7 Eustoma grandiflorum,8 Fragrea fragrans,9 Gentiana algida,10 Gentiana apiata,11 Gentiana asclepiadea,12 Gentiana crassicaulis,13 Gentiana cruciata,14 Gentiana dahurica,15 Gentiana davidii,16 Gentiana gelida,17 Gentiana kurroo,18 Gentiana lawrencei,19 Gentiana lhassica,15 Gentiana lutea,20 Gentiana macrophylla,15 Gentiana manshurica,21 Gentiana rigescens,22 Gentiana robusta, Gentiana straminea, Gentiana tibetica, Gentiana waltonii,15 Genus swertia,23 Swertia angustifolia,24 Swertia chirayita,25 Swertia corymbose,26 Swertia delavayi,27 Swertia franchentiana,28 Swertia hispidicalyx,29 Swertia japonica,30 Swertia kouitchensis,31 Swertia longifolia,32 Swertia mileensis,33 Swertia mussotii,34 Swertia patens,35 Swertia psudochinesis,36 and Swertia punicea.37

Medicinal Uses of E. littorale

In Ayurveda, E. littorale Blume is known as “Nagajihva” or “Mamejawa”. It is an evergreen herb generally found in the Indian and Tropical African coastal regions. Traditionally, the plant is used for the treatment of diabetes, rheumatism, stomach ulcers, swelling and insect poisoning. Furthermore, antipyretic, antimalarial, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic and antimicrobial activities have also been demonstrated.38 Various parts of E. littorale have been used for specific purposes. For example, roots are used to treat ailments, including malaria, skin diseases, leprosy and diabetes. Leaves are reported to possess protective effects, such as hypoglycemic, antioxidant, hepatoprotective and hepatomodulatory properties, and to ameliorate obesity.39

Biochemistry of Swertiamarin

Plants belonging to the family Gentianaceae are known for their bitter taste, which is supported by many compounds, including swertiamarin.40 A biochemical pathway that converts swertiamarin to erythrocentaurin has been suggested. Hydrolysis of swertiamarin is facilitated by the bacterial β-glucosidase enzyme to produce an aglycone. Subsequently, it was discovered that in vivo, the metabolism of the monoterpene compound swertiamarin to dihydroisocoumarin (an alkaloid) might be the main contributing structure that confers its pharmacological effect.15

Isolation of Swertiamarin

Jaishree et al41 reported the conventional isolation method of swertiamarin from the ethyl acetate extract of Enicostemma littorale (E. littorale). Briefly, the powdered whole plant of E. axillare (250 g) was successively extracted with petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate and methanol (1.5 liters each) in a Soxhlet extractor for 18–20 h. Subsequently, the extracts were concentrated and dried under reduced pressure and a controlled temperature. The extract, which yielded a brown semisolid, was chromatographed with silica gel and then eluted with 1) ethyl acetate, 2) ethyl acetate: acetone and 3) acetone mixtures. The ethyl acetate: acetone fractions were collected and rechromatographed (silica gel, 100–200 mesh). The elution was conducted using chloroform: methanol (9:1), which gave pure swertiamarin (yield 1 g, 0.4%). However, a rapid method for isolating swertiamarin from E. littorale has been found to have an almost five times higher yield42 than the conventional method reported by Jaishree et al.41 In brief, 25 g of powdered plant material was defatted with petroleum ether followed by extraction with methanol (4 × 200 mL) by cold maceration. Approximately 50 mL of the methanolic extract was obtained after purification and concentration under vacuum. The extract was then treated with cold diethyl ether to produce a precipitate (8.66 g). A fraction of the precipitate (3 g) on silica gel was chromatographed (by column chromatography) and eluted with petroleum ether. The elution obtained included 1) petroleum ether containing ethyl acetate (0–18%), 2) ethyl acetate and 3) ethyl acetate containing increasing quantities of methanol (0–12%). Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was used to track the different fractions obtained using ethyl acetate: methanol: water (7.7:1.5:0.5). Thereafter, the fractions containing swertiamarin were combined and concentrated to dryness (yield 0.53 g, 2.12%).

Structural Characterization of Swertiamarin

A very detailed structural characterization of swertiamarin is given below based on the values obtained from spectroscopic methods, including UV, FT-IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR and ESI-MS. The obtained values are comparable with the spectral data published earlier by other researchers.43,44

UV (λmax): 236.8 nm in methanol.

FT-IR (KBr): 3450 cm−1 (-OH), 1750 cm−1 (C=O), 1650 cm−1 (C=C) and 1390 to 860 cm−1 (C-O).

1H NMR (DMSO, 400 MHz): Swertiamarin showed vinyl group protons at δ 5.30 (1H, dd, 9.2 Hz, 2.5 Hz, H-10α), 5.36 (1H, dd, 16.3 Hz, 2.5 Hz, H-10β) and at δ 5.42 (1H, m, H-8), acetal methine proton at δ 5.72 (1H, d, 2 Hz, H-1) and a trisubstituted double bond at δ 7.63 (1H, s, H-3). An anomeric proton signal at δ 4.63 (1H, d, 7 Hz, H-1ʹ) was also recognized. Additional signals corresponding to the glucopyranocyl group appeared at δ 3.20 (1H, dd, 8.5 Hz, 8.1 Hz, H-2ʹ), 3.32 (2H, m, H-3ʹ, H-4ʹ), 3.65 (2H, dd, 8.8 Hz, 8.1 Hz, H-5ʹ, H-6ʹα) and 3.89 (1H, dd, 8.5 Hz, 8.1 Hz, H-6ʹβ). The signals at δ 4.33 (1H, ddd, 11.0 Hz, 5.1 Hz, 3.3 Hz, H-7α) and 4.75 (1H, ddd, 13.5 Hz, 11.0 Hz, 2.9 Hz, H-7β) are due to an oxymethylene group. The signals at δ 1.75 (1H, d, 14.0 Hz, H-6α) and 1.90 (1H, ddd, 13.9 Hz, 13.2 Hz, 5.1 Hz, H-6β) are attributed to a methylene group and the other lone signal at δ 2.91 (1H, dd, 9.2 Hz, 1.5 Hz H-9) corresponds to a methine proton.

13C NMR (DMSO, 100 MHz): Swertiamarin displayed 16 signals in the 13C-NMR spectrum. Out of these signals, six signals were assigned to the glucose moiety. The signal at δ 100.2 is attributed to the anomeric carbon of the glucose moiety, and the –CH2OH carbon appeared at δ 62.6 (C-6´). The other four carbons under oxygen functionality in the glucose moiety appeared at δ 74.4 (C-2´), 77.8 (C-3´), 71.4 (C-4´) and 78.6 (C-5´). With respect to the aglycone portion of this compound, the signal at δ 99.1 is the characteristic signal of the C-1 atom of the seco-iridoid moiety. The signals at δ 121.2 (C-10) and 133.8 (C-8) are attributed to the vinylic portion of the compound. The carbonyl group appeared at δ 167.9. The signals at δ 154.7 (C-3) and 108.9 (C-4) were assigned to the double bond between C-3 and C-4. The signals in the upfield region at δ 64.3 and 65.9 are due to carbon atoms in the oxygen functional groups at C-5 and C-7, respectively, and the signal at δ 33.8 is due to a methylene carbon atom at C-6.

ESI-MS (m/z): 375 [M+1], 397 [M+Na+] and 413 [M+K+]. The molecular weight of swertiamarin is 374 with a molecular formula of C16H22O10.

Physicochemical Properties of Swertiamarin

There are several barriers to overcome for any drug molecule to enter into its active site. However, many complicated biological processes can be modeled using simple physical chemistry models or properties, and understanding these often drives both the lead optimization and lead identification phases of a drug discovery program forward. There are certain physicochemical properties that allow a molecule to become a drug-like molecule: the molecule should be 1) small enough to be transported throughout the body, 2) hydrophilic enough to dissolve in the bloodstream, 3) lipophilic enough to cross fat barriers within the body, and 4) contain enough polar groups to enable it to bind to a receptor, but not so many that it would be eliminated to quickly from the body via the urine before exerting therapeutic effects. The physicochemical properties of swertiamarin were mainly obtained from PubChem45 and other trustworthy databases. The drug-like properties (molecular weight, H-bond donors, H-bond acceptors, log P value and rotatable bonds) as mentioned in Lipinski’s rule of five46 were determined by using Biovia Discovery studio version 19.0. A drug molecule possesses one or more functional groups positioned in three-dimensional space on a structural framework that holds functional groups in a defined geometrical array that enables the molecule to bind specifically to a targeted biological macromolecule, the receptor. All the obtained details about the physicochemical properties of swertiamarin are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Computed Physicochemical Properties of Swertiamarin

Property	Result/value
Common name	Swertiamarin
Synonyms	Swertiamarine; Swertiamaroside; Swertiamari; Wertiamarin
Category	Iridoid/Seco-iridoid
IUPAC name	(3S,4R,4aR)-4-ethenyl-4a-hydroxy-3-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy-3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrano[3,4-c]pyran-8-one
Other name(s)	(4aR,5R,6S)-5-ethenyl-6-(β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-4,4a,5,6-tetrahydro-4a-hydroxy-1H,3H-pyrano[3,4-c]pyran-1-one; 4,4a,5,6-tetrahydro-4aa-hydroxy-1-oxo-5b-vinyl-1H,3H-pyrano[3,4-c]pyran-6-yl b-D-glucopyranoside; 4,4a,5,6-tetrahydro-4a-hydroxy-6-(tetrahydro-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-2H-pyran-2-yloxy)-5-vinylpyrano[3,4-c]pyran-(3H)-one
Canonical SMILES	C=CC1C(OC=C2C1(CCOC2=O)O)OC3C(C(C(C(O3)CO)O)O)O
Isomeric SMILES	C=C[C@H]1[C@@H](OC=C2[C@]1(CCOC2=O)O)O[C@H]3[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O3)CO)O)O)O
Molecular formula	C16H22O10
Molecular weight	374.34 g/mol
Hydrogen bond donors	5
Hydrogen bond acceptors	10
Rotatable bonds	4
Log P (partition coefficient value)	0.64 (Predicted)
Molar refractivity	82.12 cm3
Topological polar surface area	155 Å2
Percent composition	C = 51.34%, H = 5.92%, O = 42.74%
Optical rotation	[α]D20 −127° (c=1 in 96% ethanol)
XLogP3-AA	−2
Molar mass	374.121297 Da
Monoisotopic mass	374.121297 Da
Heavy atom count	26
Formal charge	0
Complexity	592
Isotope atom count	0
Atom stereocenter count	8
Bond stereocenter count	0
Covalently-bonded unit count	1
Canonicalized	Yes
Melting point	113–114 °C
Boiling point	649.3±55.0 °C (Predicted)
Appearance	Slightly pale yellow crystals
Solubility	Soluble in DMSO, formation of yellow solution in methanol
Density	1.57±0.1 g/cm3 (Predicted)
pKa	11.56±0.60 (Predicted)
Molar volume	278.51
Molecular polar surface area	155.14
Molecular 3D-polar SASA	264.008
Molecular SASA	523.67
Molar refraction	82.12

Biosynthesis of Swertiamarin

The biosynthetic pathway of seco-iridoid is mostly unresolved. It begins with geraniol and is thought to consist of approximately 10 enzymes that catalyze successive reactions of oxidation, reduction, glycosylation and methylation.47 Only the first step (geraniol 10-hydroxylase, G-10H) and the last two steps (loganic acid O-methyltransferase, LAMT; and secologanin synthase, SLS) are well known, although the pathway has been explored for many years.47–52 Isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) is an essential intermediate in the biosynthesis of terpenes and terpenoids that can be generated through the MVA and MEP pathways.53 The same concept has been adopted for the biosynthesis of seco-iridoids.47,53 IPP and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) condense together to form geranyl diphosphate (GPP), which is the starting precursor for the seco-iridoid pathway for the biosynthesis of swertiamarin (Figures 4–6).

Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potential of Swertiamarin

Swertiamarin has been reported to possess many pharmacological activities. The underlying molecular mechanisms of action of the associated activities were identified through modulation of gene expression (Figures 7 and 8) and are summarized in Table 2.

Figure 7

Pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential of swertiamarin.

Figure 8

Molecular mechanism of action of swertiamarin.

Table 2

An Overview of the Underlying Molecular Mechanisms for Different Pharmacological Properties of Swertiamarin

Pharmacological Property	Mechanism	Reference
Anti-inflammatory and antiarthritis	↓ TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 ↑ IL-4 and IL-10 Inhibition of p38 and MAPK ↑ mRNA of caspase-3 ↑ Protein levels of Th2-mediated cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10) ↓ Proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6)	Zhang et al;54 Saravanan et al;55 Saravanan et al;56 Saravanan et al57
Analgesic	Not identified	Jaishree et al (2009)
Hepatoprotective	Upregulation of Nrf2 ↓ SREBP-1, FAS and acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 Regulation of Bax, cleaved caspase-3 proteins, TGF-β1, collagen I, collagen III, CTGF and fibronectin mRNA Regulation of Bcl-2 levels Regulation of hepatic PI3K/Akt pathway ↓ MDA ↓ Inflammatory cytokines (iNOS and IL-1β) Upregulation of AT1R Inhibit Ang II–induced ERK	Yang et al;60 Zhang et al;61 Wu et al62
Antidiabetic	↑ PPARγ/GLUT-4 and adiponectin mRNA ↓ Oxidative stress ↓ Insulin resistance Upregulation of GLUT-2 ↓ PEPCK α-Glucosidase inhibitor	Vaidya et al;66 Patel et al;70 Ahamad et al72
Antioxidant	↓ Cleavage of caspase-3 and PARP1 ↓ PEPCK; regulates AMPK ↓ Oxidative stress ↓ IR, PI3K, AKT in Ser (P)307 IRS-1	Patel et al73
Gastroprotective	Inhibition of dopamine D2 receptor	Kimura and Sumiyoshi74
Lung protection	↑ Arterial oxygen partial pressure/fractional inspired oxygen ratio ↑ Superoxide dismutase and GSH-Px, the levels of IL-10, glutathione and IκBα ↓ Neutrophils and lymphocytes, activity of MPO ↓ TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, MDA, NF-κB p65 and p-IKK α/β (Ser 180/Ser 181)	Yao et al75
Neuroprotection	Upregulation of SOD-3 and GST-4 Downregulation of DAF-16 and SKN-1 ↑ IL-10 ↓ TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β Upregulation of DAF-16 possibly via upregulation of unc-17	Pandey et al;76 Deng et al;77 Wang et al84
Anticancer	Not identified	–

Note: The upward arrow (↑) indicates an increased response, and the downward arrow (↓) indicates a decreased response.

Anti-Inflammatory and Antiarthritis Activities

The protective effects of swertiamarin against inflammation-induced injury have been reported in several studies. Most recently, Zhang et al54 investigated the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of swertiamarin using an azide-labeled swertiamarin probe. The probe was used for protein target fishing in which protein kinase B (AKT) was specifically captured. Immunofluorescence colocalization with AKT confirmed that AKT was targeted by swertiamarin. In addition, a set of AKT inhibitors was used, and a membrane translocation experiment was conducted to confirm the pleckstrin homology domain of AKT. This specific binding of swertiamarin directly deactivated the phosphorylation of AKT on both Ser473 and Thr308, which subsequently induced the dephosphorylation of IκB kinase enzyme (IKK) and nuclear factor kappa-light chain enhancer of activated B-cells (NF-κB). Swertiamarin treatment also suppressed the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6 (IL-6), and IL-8, in cells (BEAS-2B cells, RAW264.7 cells and HEK 293T cells) and in an acute lung injury animal model by targeting the AKT-pleckstrin homology (AKT-PH) domain. This study revealed that swertiamarin can act as a natural AKT inhibitor to regulate inflammatory conditions.54

In another study on arthritic rats by Saravanan et al,55 the effect of swertiamarin on the biochemical parameters, proinflammatory cytokines, enzymes and histopathology and radiography was investigated. The study confirmed that swertiamarin controlled the levels of free radicals, lysosomal enzymes, and bone destructive enzymes and modulated the paw thickness of arthritic rats. Additionally, swertiamarin treatment ameliorated bone loss and regulated inflammatory chemokines in the affected joints, as evidenced by histopathological and radiological examinations. Additionally, the protein levels of p65, NF-kB, p-IkBa, p-STAT3 and p-JAK2 were markedly decreased after swertiamarin treatment, as shown in the animal models and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. The levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 were decreased, while IL-4 and IL-10 were increased in swertiamarin-administered arthritic rats compared to untreated animals. Furthermore, disease progression was also ameliorated by regulating the NF-kB/IkB and JAK2/STAT3 pathways, suggesting that swertiamarin is useful in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.55

Saravanan et al56 also investigated the anti-inflammatory effect of swertiamarin in IL-1β-induced fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) isolated from Freund’s complete adjuvant-induced arthritic rats. The results showed that swertiamarin diminished IL-1β-induced cell proliferation (149.46±13.73%) and nitric oxide production (162.03±11.03%). Both the mRNA and protein levels of apoptotic markers (caspase-3), proinflammatory mediators [TNF-α, IL-6, prostaglandin-E2 (PGE2), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and matrix metallopeptidases (MMPs)] and osteoclastogenic mediators (RANKL) were expressed in a more regulated manner. In addition, swertiamarin treatment inhibited the levels of p38 MAPK in a dose-dependent manner but significantly reduced the levels in a time-dependent manner. Overall, the study confirmed the potential anti-inflammatory activity of swertiamarin by ameliorating aggressive FLSs.

In addition, the immunomodulatory effect of swertiamarin was also studied by Saravanan et al57 using in vitro and in vivo models (2, 5 and 10 mg/kg/day, P.O., for seven days). Higher HA titers, PFCs, and spleen and thymus weights were found in animals that received swertiamarin treatment, although fewer immunoinflammatory responses were seen in the delayed-type hypersensitivity test. The active compound swertiamarin also increased the mRNA and protein levels of Th2-mediated cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10) in animals. Additionally, swertiamarin administration diminished the levels of Th1-mediated cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6) in concanavalin A (Con A)-stimulated splenocytes. Furthermore, phytohemagglutinin-induced neutrophils could not generate free radicals, and the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-a, IL-1β and IL-6) in LPS-induced macrophages was suppressed following swertiamarin administration.

Swertiamarin treatment also has an antiosteoclastogenic role in preventing bone destruction by regulating inflammatory responses. Swertiamarin administration decreased the expression of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), receptor activator of NF-kB ligand (RANKL) and receptor activator of NF-kB (RANK) levels and increased the levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in the in vivo model (2, 5 and 10 mg/kg, P.O. for 14 days), as well as in vitro (50 μg/mL) in osteoblasts and osteoclasts treated with Freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA). In the osteoblast and osteoclast coculture system, swertiamarin treatment also modulated the levels of proinflammatory cytokines, MMPs and NF-κB. In addition, in silico analysis showed that swertiamarin had an affinity for low binding energy residues of the proteins RANK, RANKL, and OPG. This research has revealed the antiosteoclastogenic role of swertiamarin in preventing bone destruction.58 In an earlier study, Vaijanathappa and Badami59 utilized rats for paw edema tests using carrageenan, formalin and histamine induction to investigate the antiedematogenic activity of swertiamarin (100 and 200 mg/kg, P.O.). Interestingly, the anti-inflammatory effects of swertiamarin (200 mg/kg) tended to be superior to those of diclofenac sodium in all investigations purported to act via antioxidant mechanisms.

The mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory effects are primarily due to the inhibition of NF-κB, which is a key inflammatory response mediator. In addition, the effect of swertiamarin on other tissue injury models should also be examined in future research. Therefore, further preclinical studies are needed in which sepsis and/or other models of tissue injury are treated with swertiamarin and its metabolites.

Analgesic Activity

The analgesic potential of swertiamarin has been reported by Jaishree et al.41 The study investigated the in vivo antinociceptive activity of swertiamarin (100 and 200 mg/kg, P.O.) in mice and found that swertiamarin treatments significantly increased the latency period on a hot plate. The tail withdrawal reflex was increased in a dose-dependent manner, and a high percentage of pain protection was also observed. Interestingly, swertiamarin conferred better analgesic activity than standard paracetamol in both investigated methods. This finding suggests that swertiamarin may exert its antinociceptive activity by acting on both the peripheral and central nervous systems. Apart from this study, no other studies have reported the analgesic activity of swertiamarin. Thus, satisfactory mechanisms of action for the analgesic action of swertiamarin remain to be established.

Hepatoprotective Activity

Jaishree and Badami5 were the first to report the hepatoprotective effect of swertiamarin by evaluating its ability (100 and 200 mg/kg/day, P.O., for eight days) to protect rats with hepatic dysfunction caused by galactosamine (d-GalN) (200 mg/kg, i.p., 8th day). Swertiamarin treatment reversed the alterations in biochemical parameters caused by d-GalN. Interestingly, swertiamarin also protected against nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in fructose-fed mice, as reported by Yang et al.60 Following the administration of swertiamarin (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg/day, intragastric, for four weeks), the plasma levels of uric acid, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), triglycerides, serum glucose, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were decreased. Based on the histological evaluations, swertiamarin also relieved hepatic ballooning degeneration. Oxidative stress and the levels of proinflammatory cytokines were reduced in the liver, causing a slowing down of xanthine oxidase (XO) enzymatic action and strengthening the defensive mechanism together with activation of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) in fructose-administered mice. Moreover, swertiamarin treatment also suppressed the expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS), sterol-regulatory element-binding protein-1 (SREBP-1), and acetyl-CoA carboxylase 1 in the liver of fructose-fed mice. Thus, it was concluded that swertiamarin can improve NAFLD by regulating carbohydrate metabolism.

In another study, swertiamarin was administered to Sprague-Dawley rats with hepatic impairment induced by carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) to study its possible pathways.61 The rats were administered 40% CCl4 via a subcutaneous injection followed by swertiamarin (100 and 200 mg/kg/day, P.O., for eight weeks). There was a remarkable decrease in the number of TUNEL-positive cells in swertiamarin-treated animals compared to untreated rats. Both the mRNA and protein levels of Bax, cleaved caspase-3 proteins, transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1), collagen I, collagen III, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and fibronectin were decreased after swertiamarin treatment. Furthermore, the increased levels of Bcl-2 stimulated by swertiamarin reversed the effect of carbon CCl4. Additionally, the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) pathway, responsible for hepatic cell survival, was also suppressed, suggesting that swertiamarin has the potency to alleviate murine hepatic cell death.

Another study also confirmed the hepatoprotective effect of swertiamarin on CCl4-induced liver failure.62 Swertiamarin administration (100 and 200 mg/kg/day, P.O., for eight weeks) alleviated serum ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels and ameliorated liver cellular changes caused by CCl4. Free radical-stimulated damage in the liver was also decreased, as evidenced by decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels along with increased levels of antioxidants, including superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, and glutathione. In addition, swertiamarin ameliorated the liver injury caused by CCl4-induced inflammation by reducing the levels of inducible iNOS and IL-1β. Cytochrome P450 (CYP), efflux transporters and the PDZK1 gene were more significantly expressed in the swertiamarin-treated group. Therefore, it was concluded that swertiamarin protects rat livers from CCl4-induced inflammation by acting as an antioxidant and activator of detoxification enzymes and promoting the expression of efflux transporters via the nuclear Nrf2/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) pathway.62

It has been reported that the development of hepatic fibrosis depends on the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), making it the focus in developing a favorable therapy. Li et al63 investigated the effects of swertiamarin (15 and 20 mg/kg/day, i.p., for two weeks) on dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) (10 µg/kg, i.p., 3 days/week for four weeks) and confirmed that its primary mechanisms were by acting on RAS. Swertiamarin significantly inactivated hepatic stellate cell (HSC) growth due to angiotensin II (Ang II). Additionally, swertiamarin repressed DMN-induced α-smooth muscle actin synthesis and improved liver function. Ang II–induced angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), as well as c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) phosphorylation in HSCs, were inhibited by swertiamarin. Swertiamarin ameliorated the inhibition of plasma Ang II in rats exposed to DMN. A similar effect was also shown in murine liver in terms of DMN-induced AT1R upregulation and ERK and JNK phosphorylation. Therefore, it was concluded that swertiamarin may attenuate hepatic fibrosis by inhibiting HSC activation via RAS regulation.

Several animal experiments to detect the protective effects of swertiamarin against hepatotoxic agents have been summarized in this review. Swertiamarin serves as an antidote to hepatotoxicity caused by chemical compounds, according to the findings of various studies. In particular, swertiamarin demonstrated anti-inflammatory activity in the liver by decreasing TGF-β1 protein expression. In addition, multiple pathways, such as oxidative stress inhibition, inflammation, and apoptosis, are involved in the hepatoprotective effects of swertiamarin. However, there is a need for more research to examine the hepatoprotective effects of swertiamarin on human intoxication and from the perspective of mitochondrial damage that should be discussed in the future.

Antidiabetic Activity

Some medicinal plants, including Gentiana kurroo,18 E. littorale,40 Swertia longifolia,32 and Swertia chirayita,64 which contain swertiamarin as one of the major ingredients, have been reported to have antidiabetic properties. Numerous in vivo studies have been performed to investigate the antidiabetic properties of swertiamarin and the underlying mechanism of action.

Ghazanfar et al18 investigated the antidiabetic effect of methanolic and hydroethanolic extracts of Gentiana kurroo Royle. The results showed that decreased serum glucose concentrations in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats were detected, which may be attributed to the presence of swertiamarin, which has been reported as one of the major constituents of Gentiana kurroo Royle.65 Additionally, the levels of other related biochemical parameters, such as triglycerides, ALP, creatinine, cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins (LDL), pyruvate transaminases, and serum glutamate oxaloacetate, were also ameliorated. Interestingly, regeneration of β-cells in the pancreas of diabetic rats confirmed the potential antidiabetic effect of the extract, which is probably contributed by swertiamarin.

In addition, Saeidnia et al32 investigated the α-amylase inhibitory activity of some genera containing swertiamarin and proposed that they possess good antidiabetic candidates that have the potential to be formulated. Patel et al40 reported the antihyperglycemic and antihyperlipidemic properties of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of E. littorale. Swertiamarin can metabolize into an active compound called gentianine that has a pharmacophoric moiety (Figure 9). Vaidya et al66 investigated whether gentianine could contribute to the antidiabetic effect of swertiamarin. There was no major impact of swertiamarin on adipogenesis or the mRNA expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma (PPAR-γ) and glucose transporter-4 (GLUT-4); however, there was a substantial increase in adiponectin mRNA expression. Comparatively, gentianine treatment substantially improved adipogenesis, which was associated with a substantial increase in the mRNA levels of PPAR-γ, GLUT-4 and adiponectin, suggesting that the antidiabetic function of swertiamarin is contributed by its active metabolite gentianine.

Figure 9

Metabolic conversion of swertiamarin to gentianine by intestinal microflora.

The benefits of swertiamarin on dyslipidemic conditions associated with type 2 diabetes in streptozotocin-induced (90 mg/kg, i.p.) rats have been explored by Vaidya et al.67 Swertiamarin administration (50 mg/kg/day, i.p., for six weeks) markedly decreased serum triglycerides, cholesterol and LDL levels. Similarly, there was a notable decline in fasting glucose levels. Furthermore, the elevation of the insulin sensitivity index was significantly observed in rats that received swertiamarin treatment. Taken together, the findings suggest that swertiamarin exerts beneficial effects on diabetic complications such as dyslipidemia. Vaidya et al68 also reported that swertiamarin could alleviate diabetes and its cardiovascular complications, such as atherosclerosis and renal failure, in Zucker fa/fa rats. The levels of serum glucose, triglycerides, nonesterified free fatty acids and cholesterol were decreased compared to those in untreated rats upon swertiamarin treatment (75 mg/kg/day, i.p., for 28 days). A similar effect was also seen in the reduction of serum MMP-9, MMP-3 and urea levels.

In addition, Dhanavathy69 also investigated the antidiabetic activity of swertiamarin in STZ-induced (50 mg/kg, i.p.) diabetic rats. Swertiamarin treatment (15, 25 and 50 mg/kg/day, P.O., 28 days) resulted in a remarkable reduction in fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, total glycerides, and LDL levels. The levels of hemoglobin, plasma insulin, total protein, body weight and HDL were also significantly increased compared to STZ-induced diabetic rats, indicating that swertiamarin can ameliorate hyperglycemia and its complications.

The therapeutic effect of swertiamarin in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus rats was investigated by Patel et al.70 Swertiamarin (50 mg/kg/day, P.O., for 40 days) and aqueous extract of E. littorale (15 g of dried plant equivalent extract/kg, P.O., for 40 days) restored the activity of glucose-6-phosphatase and 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) while maintaining the physiological transcriptional levels of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK), glucokinase (GCK), glucose transporter type 2 (GLUT-2), PPAR-γ, leptin (LEP), adiponectin (ADIPOQ), lipoprotein lipase (LPL), sterol regulatory element-binding transcription factor-1c (SREBP-1c) and glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT-4) genes. These findings suggest that both treatments improved insulin sensitivity and controlled carbohydrate and fat metabolism.

Furthermore, the therapeutic effect of E. littorale aqueous extract (1 g/kg/day, P.O., for three weeks) and swertiamarin (50 mg/kg/day, P.O., for three weeks) on rats with type 1 diabetic nephropathy (DN) complications has also been investigated.71 Serum urea and creatinine and other parameters linked to the progression of DN type 1 were markedly reduced after the treatments. Glomerular function was also substantially enhanced at the cellular level in rats treated with aqueous extracts of E. littorale and swertiamarin.

Finally, Ahamad et al72 used in vitro and in vivo models to determine the potential of swertiamarin in maintaining glucose homeostasis via the inhibition of carbohydrate (starch and sucrose)-metabolizing enzymes. The results showed that swertiamarin (20 mg/kg, P.O.) could inhibit α-amylase and α-glucosidase with minimum 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 1.29±0.25 mg/mL (starch-fed mice) and 0.84±0.11 mg/mL (sucrose-fed mice), respectively. Studies in carbohydrate-challenged mice indicated that swertiamarin effectively ameliorated the increase in peak blood glucose levels. The increase in peak blood glucose levels was only 49 mg/dl (starch-fed mice) and 57 mg/dl (sucrose-fed mice) in the swertiamarin-treated groups compared to 70 mg/dl (starch-fed mice) and 80 mg/dl (sucrose-fed mice) in the untreated groups.

While all the available in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that swertiamarin has good potential to be used in the treatment of diabetes, we understand the need for clinical studies. It is important to further investigate studies focusing on the effective dose of swertiamarin and the comprehensive effects on insulin, lipid, plasma glucose and HbA1c levels. Further analysis of the mechanism of swertiamarin in diabetes should pay attention to the relationship between different mechanisms.

Antioxidant Activity

Several preclinical studies have indicated that swertiamarin possesses good antioxidant properties. To date, most experimental models reported in the literature have investigated the use of swertiamarin in animal models with preexisting pathologies. Since the main therapeutic effect of swertiamarin is glucose regulation and liver protection, as described in the previous sections of this review, most studies have utilized diabetic animal and hepatotoxicity-induced models to address the protective role of swertiamarin as an antioxidant in affected organs, such as the pancreas, liver or kidneys.

In an earlier study, Vaijanathappa and Badami59 utilized seven different in vitro methods to evaluate the antioxidant properties of swertiamarin. They observed potent antioxidant activity based on 2,2ʹ-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) and hydrogen peroxide methods. Moderate activity in deoxyribose and lipid peroxidation assays with low IC50 values was observed in which the total antioxidant capacity of swertiamarin was 4.51 mM ascorbic acid per gram, indicating that swertiamarin is a good antioxidant.

Patel et al73 demonstrated the antioxidant and lipid-lowering properties of swertiamarin. Swertiamarin also improved NAFLD-related conditions, including the accumulation of fat in the liver, inflammation and impaired insulin sensitivity. Briefly, oleic acid (1 mM) was administered for 24 hours to mediate steatosis in HepG2 cells, as confirmed by the significant accumulation of lipid droplets in Oil Red O (ORO) staining and triglyceride accumulation. Administration of swertiamarin (25 μg/mL) decreased triglyceride levels, membrane integrity and LDH secretion to prevent cell death due to reduced cleavage of caspase-3 and poly (ADP-ribose) (PARP1). In addition, swertiamarin increased the expression of major insulin signaling proteins, such as insulin receptor (IR), PI3K, and pAkt, with a concomitant reduction in p307 IRS-1. Swertiamarin also activated adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation, which led to restoration of insulin sensitivity in HepG2 cells. Furthermore, oleic acid upregulated sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP)-1c and fatty acid synthase (FAS), resulting in increased synthesis of fatty acids. PPAR-α, a major potential modulator of carbohydrate metabolism, is effectively regulated by swertiamarin to reduce the levels of the gluconeogenic enzyme PEPCK, limiting gluconeogenesis and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. Collectively, swertiamarin targets the potential metabolic regulator AMPK to promote a more controlled hepatic glycemic burden, fat accumulation, insulin resistance and amelioration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in hepatic steatosis. These findings indicate the potential use of swertiamarin in regulating metabolism clinically and as a promising novel therapeutic agent in the treatment of NAFLD.

The biological characteristics of swertiamarin with a typical antioxidant action mechanism are highlighted in this review. The above results indicate that swertiamarin has been successful in improving antioxidant levels under oxidative stress conditions.

Gastroprotective Activity

There is only one study investigating the gastroprotective effects of swertiamarin (25 and 50 mg/kg, P.O.) on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal motility74 in mice administered atropine, dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). The results indicated that gastric emptying and gastrointestinal motility stimulated by dopamine (1 mg/kg, i.p.) were inhibited by swertiamarin at a dose of 50 mg/kg. However, swertiamarin stimulated gastric emptying and gastrointestinal motility induced by 5-HT (4 mg/kg, i.p.). It is plausible that swertiamarin acts as a dopamine D2 receptor inhibitor while not affecting the 5-HT receptor, therefore indicating its potential effect on functional dyspepsia. Nevertheless, the mechanism of action underlying gastric emptying and gastrointestinal motility remains to be elucidated. Aside from this review, no other studies have been published to the best of our knowledge on the protective effects of swertiamarin against esophageal and gastric disorders. It is therefore proposed that swertiamarin be used in the study of a wide range of gastrointestinal tract properties, such as reflux esophagitis defense, Barrett’s esophagus, and damage to the gastric mucosa caused by certain anti-inflammatory drugs and necrotizing agents.

Protection Against Lung Injury

The protective effect and possible mechanisms of swertiamarin against a sepsis-induced acute lung injury model in rats were evaluated.75 The results showed that swertiamarin significantly increased the arterial oxygen partial pressure/fractional inspired oxygen ratio, the activities of superoxide dismutase and GSH-Px and the levels of IL-10, glutathione and IκBα followed by decreasing the lung wet to dry ratio, the neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, the protein content, the activity of MPO and the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, MDA, NF-κB, p65 and p-IKK α/β (Ser 180/Ser 181). The survival rate of rats with cecal ligation and puncture (CLP)-induced acute lung injury was significantly increased following treatment with swertiamarin. Swertiamarin also showed a protective effect against CLP-induced acute lung injury in rats by reducing blood capillary membrane permeability, inhibiting the inflammatory response and increasing antioxidant ability. No other studies have been published to support the notion, apart from this research, that swertiamarin plays a protective role in lung injury or disorders. It is recommended that swertiamarin also be tested for its effects on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and allergic asthma in the future, with the therapeutic effect of preventing or modulating inflammation and oxidative stress.

Neuroprotective Activity

The protective role of swertiamarin in enhancing cholinergic dysfunction has been elucidated by Pandey et al.76 Using Caenorhabditis elegans as a model, swertiamarin enhanced neurotransmission by modulating the function of acetylcholinesterase and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) via unc-17 and unc-50 upregulation. It was shown that swertiamarin inhibited AChE, as evidenced in both in vivo and cell-free systems. The in silico molecular docking of swertiamarin and human AChE exhibited strong binding energy (−6.02). Interestingly, the increase in aldicarb and levamisole sensitivity post swertiamarin treatment was curtailed to a significant level in DAF-16 and SKN-1 mutants. Additionally, swertiamarin increased the levels of endogenous antioxidant enzymes by upregulating SOD-3 and GST-4 to provide protection against neurodegeneration, indicating that swertiamarin can boost cholinergic dysfunction. In addition, the study also indicated that swertiamarin might elicit an antioxidant response through the upregulation of DAF-16, possibly via upregulation of unc-17.

In addition, the anticonvulsant activity of swertiamarin (50, 150 and 450 mg/kg, i.p.) was reported by Deng et al77 in mice treated with pilocarpine (280 mg/kg, i.p.). Swertiamarin pretreatment (150 and 450 mg/kg. i.p.) delayed the onset of the first convulsion and decreased the incidence of status epilepticus and mortality. There was a significant decrease in epileptic discharges based on electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis, where the damage in neurons was alleviated by similar doses of swertiamarin, as observed by Nissl and Fluoro-Jade B staining. Activated astrocytes can release a large number of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, as an important source of immunologically relevant cytokines that are highly related to epilepsy development.78,79 These proinflammatory cytokines are expressed in the normal brain at low levels and are extensively upregulated in patients with epilepsy.80 In addition, these cytokines alter neuronal excitability and reduce the seizure threshold, further establishing hyperexcitability of the chronic neuronal network and generating recurrent spontaneous seizures.81 Additionally, the administration of IL-10 can effectively prevent the development of epilepsy.82 The highest concentration of swertiamarin (450 mg/kg, i.p.) markedly abolished the activation of astrocytes. Additionally, Western blot analysis confirmed reduced expression of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α and increased expression of IL-10, indicating that swertiamarin exhibits anticonvulsant effects on pilocarpine-treated mice.

Similarly, Vaijanathappa et al83 explored the anticonvulsant activity of swertiamarin (10, 20 and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) in a pentylenetetrazole-induced (80 mg/kg, i.p.) mouse model. At a low dose (10 mg/kg), swertiamarin provided defense against convulsion at 33.3% in a dose-dependent manner, with 66.00% and 72.67% protection against tonic-clonic convulsions at 20 and 30 mg/kg, respectively. In addition, the higher dose of swertiamarin (30 mg/kg) yielded a 27.33% mortality rate against pentylenetetrazole-induced convulsion in albino mice. Therefore, this finding suggests that a lower dose of swertiamarin is preferable for its neuroprotective activity.

The potential of swertiamarin in preventing ischemia/reperfusion injury was also investigated using mouse middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) and primary hippocampal neuron oxygen-glucose deprivation/reperfusion (OGD/R) models.84 Before establishing the MCAO model, the mice were pretreated with swertiamarin (25, 100 and 400 mg/kg/day, i.p., for seven days), while hippocampal neurons were maintained in swertiamarin (0.1, 1 or 10 μM) during reoxygenation. A notable reduction in infarct volume, dead nerve cells and free radical damage, as well as improvement in the recovery of neurological function in vivo, was observed after swertiamarin administration. Swertiamarin also minimized the amount of ROS and enhanced cell survival. Pretreatment with swertiamarin also improved Nrf2 nuclear translocation and upregulated the expression of NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1) hemeoxygenase-1 (HO-1) both in vivo and in vitro. These effects were reversed by an Nrf2 inhibitor. Covalent molecular docking suggested the binding of swertiamarin to Keap1. In summary, swertiamarin activates the Nrf2 protective pathway to repress oxidative damage, thus making it a potential therapeutic agent against cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. The neuroprotective effects of swertiamarin have been reported in limited studies, and the mechanism is still unclear. Thus, more detailed investigations related to its neuroprotection and its mechanisms are required in the future.

Anticancer Activity

Swertiamarin has also been reported to have anticancer activity. For instance, Tang et al85 exposed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells to swertiamarin and conducted gene expression profiling. Cell survival and migration were minimized in swertiamarin-treated mice, while HepG2 cell death was induced. There was significant suppression of SK-Hep-1 cell growth xenografts in nude mice. It was plausible that the most crucial modulated pathway was PI3K-AKT, as evidenced in HepG2 cells. Estimation of 47 targets of swertiamarin was conducted by chemical genomics-based virtual screening, while the three-nearest neighbors method was used to estimate 21 targets. Both programs predicted eight targets for swertiamarin, and two of them (JUN and STAT3) that could modulate a broad range of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are important. The study concluded that swertiamarin treatment could regulate the expression of several genes that are involved in cell viability, the cell cycle, apoptosis and invasion. Moreover, the majority of these investigated genes can be clustered into pathway networks, including PI3K, JUN, and STAT3, which are expected targets of swertiamarin. Nevertheless, the exact mechanism of swertiamarin in combating tumors should be confirmed to aid in the development of a novel formulation for cancer treatment.

In a recent study, Vaijanathappa et al83 investigated the cytotoxicity of swertiamarin on HEp-2 and HT-29 cells via in vitro MTT and sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) assays. The IC50 values of swertiamarin in HepG2 cells were 35.00 ± 0.68 µg/mL (based on the MTT assay) and 56.01 ± 0.75 μg/mL (SRB). In contrast, the IC50 values in HT-29 cells were 50.00 ± 1.00 (MTT) and 100 ± 00 μg/mL (SRB).

In addition, the anticancer potential of swertiamarin in SK neuroblastoma cells has also been evaluated.86 The MTT results revealed that the IC50 value of swertiamarin was 19 ± 2.27 mM. The 10 µM human serum albumin (HSA)/α-1 acid glycoprotein (AGP) ligand concentration-induced apoptosis in NK neuroblastoma cells was half of the IC50 value of swertiamarin. Additionally, different biophysical studies and in silico studies were conducted to validate the interaction between human plasma proteins and swertiamarin in which swertiamarin was highly bound to HSA and AGP. It was also found that swertiamarin binding led to protein conformational changes due to partial unfolding of the protein, indicating the anticancer effect of swertiamarin.86

The study of the anticancer effects of natural products is an active area of research. Although it has been proven that swertiamarin has anticancer activity, most of the studies are based on in vitro experiments, but to the best of our knowledge, no in vivo or clinical research has been conducted. In the future, attention needs to be paid to the combination of in vitro and in vivo anticancer studies.

Antimicrobial Activity

The antimicrobial activity of swertiamarin has been investigated by Šiler et al.87 Their team investigated its antimicrobial activity against eight bacterial species, consisting of four gram-negative bacteria, namely, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae and Salmonella typhimurium, and four gram-positive bacteria, namely, Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Micrococcus flavus, together with five fungal species (Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus versicolor, Trichoderma viride, Penicillium funiculosum and Aspergillus fumigatus). Based on this study, swertiamarin was confirmed to have strong antibacterial activity with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.01–0.04 mg/mL and antifungal activity with an MIC of 0.001–0.1 mg/mL against all investigated organisms.

Few studies on the antimicrobial activity of swertiamarin have been performed, while encouraging findings against certain bacteria and fungi have been shown. This review indicated that more antimicrobial studies of swertiamarin could be useful in the future for the production of a novel and natural antimicrobial agent.

Toxicity Profile of Swertiamarin

The toxicity profile of swertiamarin has also been reported recently by Dhanavathy and Jayakumar88 by using acute and subchronic toxicity studies. In the acute toxicity study, the rats were treated with different oral doses of swertiamarin (5–2000 mg/kg). The results showed that swertiamarin did not produce any significant toxicity, behavioral responses, physiological changes, physical observations (skin, fur, eye mucous membrane, behavior patterns, tremors, salivation and diarrhea of the rats) or mortality in the investigated groups when compared to the controls, as observed during the 15 days of the acute toxicity experimental study. There was also no weight loss seen in the animals. In the subchronic toxicity test, the rats were free of intoxicating signs and physical changes even when the highest dose of swertiamarin (500 mg/kg) was used throughout the drug dosing period of 50 days. Additionally, no mortality or clinical signs were observed throughout the experimental period. Similarly, Jaishree and Badami5 also reported that no acute oral toxicity or mortality was observed in rats administered different doses (5, 50, 300 and 2000 mg/kg) of swertiamarin during the 30-day experimental period.

Pharmacokinetics of Swertiamarin

Very recently, Shi et al89 conducted a pharmacokinetic study of swertiamarin in rats, with gentiopicroside used as an internal standard. The half-life of swertiamarin was one hour with low oral bioavailability (5.6–6.7%). Using the UPLC-Q/TOF-MS/MS technique, Shi et al89 discovered six metabolites from the serum, urine, bile and feces of rats. In addition, they elucidated potential metabolic pathways (Figure 10) of swertiamarin in vivo.89 Furthermore, Li et al90 also performed a pharmacokinetic analysis on the intravenous and oral administration of swertiamarin to rats. Swertiamarin with low absolute bioavailability (10.3%) showed rapid absorption and elimination. Swertiamarin (25 mg/kg, P.O.) was promptly and widely distributed throughout the rat tissues. High concentrations (800 ng/mL) in the liver and kidney were found, indicating that swertiamarin might have been absorbed in the liver and eliminated by the kidney.

Figure 10

Metabolic pathways of swertiamarin. 4,4a,5,6-Tetrahydro-4a-hydroxy-6-(tetrahydro-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-2H-pyran-2-yloxy)-5-vinylpyrano[3,4-c]pyran-(3H)-one (Swertiamarin). 3,6-Dihydro-4-(1-hydroxybut-3-en-2-yl)-2-oxo-2H-pyran-3-carbaldehyde (1), 2-(3,6-dihydro-3-(hydroxymethyl)-2-oxo-2H-pyran-4-yl)but-3-enal (2), 1-oxoisochroman-5-carbaldehyde (3), 1-oxoisochroman-5-carboxylic acid (4), 3,4-dihydro-5-vinylpyrano[3,4-c]pyridin-1-one (5), and 3,5,6,8-tetrahydro-3-methyl-8-oxopyrano[3,4-c]pyran-4-carbaldehyde (6) are the metabolites of swertiamarin.89

“Qing Ye Dan” is a well-known herb that contains swertiamarin and has been widely used to treat viral hepatitis in China. A liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS)/MS method was developed to determine the levels of swertiamarin in rat plasma in three different administration methods: oral administration of swertiamarin alone, Qing Ye Dan tablets and coadministration of swertiamarin (20 mg/kg) with oleanolic acid. The results demonstrated that pharmacokinetic parameters such as the maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC0-∞), volume of distribution and clearance were significantly different among the three formulations. The data further indicated that oleanolic acid and other ingredients present in Qing Ye Dan tablets may affect the pharmacokinetic behavior of swertiamarin.91

Next, Wu et al15 also investigated swertiamarin (200 mg/kg) metabolism in rats by using LC-MS after oral administration. LC-MS detected the presence of erythrocentaurin, with a maximum plasma concentration of 425.8 ± 127.6 ng/mL at approximately 2 h following administration. The formation of erythrocentaurin was due to the hydrolysis of swertiamarin by bacterial β-glucosidase to aglycone. In addition, swertiamarin was also metabolized to dihydroisocoumarin and some alkaloidal compounds in vivo, which may contribute to its pharmacological effect.15

At present, only a few studies have been published on the pharmacokinetics of swertiamarin; thus, it should be thoroughly investigated, and its metabolites and mechanisms should be further examined in a detailed and systematic manner.

Cosmetics and Pharmaceutical Formulations of Swertiamarin

Bezivin92 studied and patented the cosmetic uses of swertiamarin. The patent claimed that swertiamarin or swertiamarin-enriched plant extract may be used to stimulate the formation or regeneration of the epidermis and/or to stimulate the metabolism of the dermis.92 In addition, based on the evidence obtained from clinical studies it is also mentioned that swertiamarin or swertiamarin-enriched plant extract may be used as an anti-aging agent, an anti-wrinkle agent, a skin complexation unifying agent, an anti-redness agent or as a skin-smoothing agent.92 Another study by Muhamad Ibrahim et al93 reported that swertiamarin formulated herbal ointment, which was tested in experimental animal models, showed significant wound healing activity. The antiaging properties, as well as other pharmacological activities of swertiamarin, make it a promising element that can be developed by the pharmaceutical industry and established in cosmetic products.

Possible Structural Modifications in Swertiamarin

It is currently still unclear whether the bioactivities of swertiamarin improve if it undergoes structural modifications. Various analogs of swertiamarin were synthesized (Figure 11) using different chemical reactions, such as fluorination, esterification and epoxidation.94 It is clear that the reactions are mainly possible with the glycan hydroxyl groups of swertiamarin. A number of potent antidiabetic swertiamarin derivatives have been developed against 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMG CoA reductase), and their docking studies have shown markedly similar significant affinity binding modes compared to swertiamarin and its well-known atorvastatin and simvastatin ligands.95 Gentianine, a swertiamarin metabolite, revealed increased adipogenesis through upregulation of the protein-encoding genes involved in adipogenesis.66 In addition, the synthesized acetylated and propionated swertiamarin derivatives also demonstrated greater antiadipogenic activity than swertiamarin in 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cells.66 The in silico design of more potent swertiamarin derivatives can be used as a path toward novel drug discovery and development. Nevertheless, in vitro and in vivo studies should be conducted in the future to confirm the safety and efficacy of all semisynthetic derivatives of swertiamarin. Additionally, more studies relating to its structure-activity relationship (SAR) are warranted in the future to obtain several other novel compounds that can be derived from swertiamarin.

Figure 11

Structural modifications of swertiamarin.

Drug-Likeness Properties of Swertiamarin

Regarding the physicochemical properties of swertiamarin, we investigated the results by applying Lipinski’s rule of five to determine its drug-likeness appearance.46 According to Lipinski’s rule of five, any drug-like compound should have 1) a molecular weight of ≤500; 2) a partition coefficient (log P)-value of ≤5; 3) H-bond donors ≤5; 4) H-bond acceptors ≤10; and 5) rotatable bonds ≤10. Since compounds that do not breach Lipinski’s rule of five may have enhanced folding, polarity, and molecular size, it is deemed that drug-like molecules have the expected pharmaceutical properties.96 Since Lipinski’s rule of five is an effective and valid guide for forecasting the potential for chemical compounds to be effective as orally administered drugs, the aim of the suggested method was merely to deliver primary evidence defining the potential physical properties of the compounds, rather than serving as rigid screening criteria by itself. Overall, based on the findings, swertiamarin meets all of Lipinski’s rule of five for drug-likeness properties (Table 1), indicating that it may be a potential therapeutic agent to combat various diseases.

Possible Cellular and Molecular Targets of Swertiamarin

Swertiamarin interacts either directly or indirectly with various molecular targets in addition to modulating their activity and function. Swertiamarin’s cellular and molecular targets are outlined in Figure 12, with some effects hypothesized to be dose-dependent. Depending on its dose or concentration, swertiamarin, for instance, both increases and decreases the proteins and markers of apoptosis. In fact, further investigations using a wide range of doses are required to investigate the dose-dependent effects of swertiamarin to understand the exact mechanism.

Figure 12

Cellular and molecular targets of swertiamarin.

Challenges and the Need for Clinical Research

A variety of beneficial properties related to human health have been reported for swertiamarin, including analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antiarthritis, hepatoprotective, antidiabetic, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer, neuroprotective and gastroprotective effects. However, although it has been considered to be a compound with a wide range of pharmacological activities, to the best of our knowledge, there is no clinical research reported so far. Therefore, clinical research on the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of swertiamarin is required, since most of these effects have only been shown in preclinical experiments. Based on the studies reported on swertiamarin, swertiamarin will eventually result in changes in the body at the level of molecules, cells, tissues and/or organs, along with its disease ameliorative effects when administered to animals or humans. Moreover, swertiamarin has become a favored choice for current research due to its multidimensional therapeutic potential and can be an outstanding novel candidate for novel drug design and the development of new derivatives with improved pharmacological and therapeutic potential. Thus, clinical trials on swertiamarin are required to evaluate the pharmacodynamic parameters caused by its physicochemical properties, including its bioavailability, half-life, adverse reactions and toxicity. In addition, clinical trials should be performed to enable the wide applicability of effective bioactive compounds.

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

This review highlights the distribution of swertiamarin in medicinal plants and its isolation, structural characterization, physicochemical properties, and biosynthesis. We have also provided scientific updates on its pharmacology and therapeutic potential. Swertiamarin has gained recognition for its many health benefits that mainly appear to function through its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Accumulating evidence provided by various preclinical studies has shown that swertiamarin can help to treat multiple diseases, based on its analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antiarthritic, hepatoprotective, antidiabetic, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer, neuroprotective and gastroprotective properties. Swertiamarin can be considered a powerful antioxidant along with multifaceted molecular targets, such as the NF-κB, MAPK/TGF-β1, AMPK, PI3K/Akt, Nrf2-HO-1, and PPARγ signaling pathways, in various pathological conditions. It can modulate multiple signaling pathways, numerous molecular targets, and gene expression. The metabolic processes and pharmacokinetics of swertiamarin in vivo have mostly been investigated in experimental animal models but have not been studied to date in the human body; thus, clinical studies are needed. Therefore, following a thorough analysis of its toxicities, detailed studies on swertiamarin are required to enhance its bioavailability and to develop novel dosage forms. In addition, novel delivery strategies, including nanoparticles, liposomes, phospholipid complexes, microemulsions or polymer micelles, are suggested to boost the pharmacokinetic properties and improve its oral bioavailability, which can help pave the way for more applicative studies and clinical trials in the near future. It is hoped that this review will stimulate further investigations on swertiamarin related to its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical and SAR studies. All these additional parameters will accelerate the development and utilization of swertiamarin as a promising drug candidate in the near future.