| Literature DB >> 34187796 |
Tania H Abi Nassif1, Karim N Daou1, Theresia Tannoury1,2, Marianne Majdalani3,4.
Abstract
We report on an 8-year-old boy, who presented to the emergency department at our institution with fever, generalised oedema and hypotension. Investigations revealed anaemia, thrombocytopenia in addition to elevated serum inflammatory markers, a negative COVID-19 PCR test and a positive COVID-19 IgG. His echocardiography was consistent with carditis in otherwise morphologically normal heart with depressed cardiac function, moderate-to-severe mitral valve regurgitation, moderate tricuspid regurgitation with an estimated right ventricular systolic pressure half systemic, trace aortic regurgitation, bilateral small pleural effusions, distended inferior vena cava and normal coronaries. He was started on inotropic support, intravenous immunoglobulin and methylprednisolone, and was transferred to the paediatric intensive care unit. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first case of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children encountered in Lebanon. The presentation and management were thoroughly described in this article aiming to share our experience and to contribute to the rapidly emerging literature on this syndrome. © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; cardiovascular medicine; infectious diseases
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34187796 PMCID: PMC8245428 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2021-242084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Case Rep ISSN: 1757-790X
Blood investigation summary on admission, hospital course and discharge
| Ref. range | 05/12/20 | 08/12/20 | 13/12/20 | 16/12/20 | |
| Adjusted white blood cell | Ref. range: 4.5-13.5 cells ×109L | 10.2×109 | 3.2 ×109 | 4.7×109 | 5×109 |
| Hemoglobin | Latest ref. range: 12.0–15.0 g/dL | 9.8 | 7.7 | 10 | 10.3 |
| Neutrophils | Latest ref. range: 35%–65% | 75 | 70.7 | 75 | 74.7 |
| Lymphocytes | Latest ref. range: 23%–53% | 18 | 24.1 | 24.5 | 25 |
| Platelets | Latest ref. range: 150-400 ×109/L | 95.6×109 | 106×109 | 651×109 | 709×109 |
| Blood urea nitrogen | Latest ref. range: 8–25 mg/dL | 33 | 27 | 29 | 21 |
| Creatinine | Latest ref. range: 0.6–1.2 mg/dL | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Carbon dioxide | Latest ref. range: 24–30 mmol/L | 20 | |||
| Bilirubin direct | Latest ref. range: 0.0–0.3 mg/dL | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | |
| Lactate dehydrogenase | Latest ref. range: 110–265 IU/L | 232 | |||
| Albumin | Latest ref. range: 36–53 g/L | 23 | 31 | 39 | |
| Lactic acid (arterial) | Latest ref. range: 0.55–2.20 mmol/L | 2.92 | |||
| Ferritin | Latest ref. range: 25.0–310.0 ng/mL | 748 | 600 | 797 | 933 |
| Pro-BNP (NT-pro-BNP) | Latest units: pg/mL | 13 369 | 21 481 | 4025 | |
| Interlukin-6 | <7.0 pg/mL | 26.8 | 2.8 | ||
| Procalcitonin | ≤0.05 ng/mL | 2.87 | 0.96 | ||
| Alkaline phosphatase | Latest ref. range: 20–385 IU/L | 614 | 342 | 251 | |
| Gamma-glutamyl transferase | Latest ref. range: 10–50 IU/L | 114 (H) | 501 | 392 | |
| Troponin T | Latest ref. range: 0.000–0.030 ng/mL | 0.083 (H) | 0.06 | 0.05 | |
| C reactive protein | Latest ref. range: 0.0–2.5 mg/L | 140.7 (H) | 32.8 | 5.1 | 1.4 |
| D-dimer | Latest ref. range: ≤255 ng/mL | 2319 (H) | 3037 | 677 | 458 |
| Haptoglobin | Latest ref. range: 0.30–2.00 g/L | 2.04 (H) | |||
| C3 complement | Latest ref. range: 0.90–1.80 g/L | 0.42 (L) | |||
| C4 complement | Latest ref. range: 0.10–0.40 g/L | <0.02 (L) | |||
| Cytomegalovirus IgM | Non-reactive <0.85 | Non-reactive | |||
| Cytomegalovirus IgG | Non-reactive <6.0 AU/mL | <6.0 | |||
| Epstein Barr Virus Viral capsid antigenIgG | Reactive ≥1.00 | 41.95 | |||
| Epstein Barr Virus Viral capsid antigen IgM | Non-reactive <0.50 | Non-reactive | |||
| COVID-19 Ab, IgM | Negative | ||||
| COVID-19 Ab, IgG | Positive | ||||
| COVID-19 | Not detected |
NT-pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; pro-BNP, pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
Figure 1Chest and abdominal CT on second day of admission.
Figure 2Echocardiogram: moderate-to-severe mitral valve regurgitation.
Echocardiographic findings on admission, discharge and at 1-month follow-up
| Echocardiography | Findings |
| Admission | Depressed left ventricular systolic function, estimated EF 50%–53%, moderate-to-severe MR, suspicion of anterior MV leaflet tip prolapse versus chordae rupture |
| Discharge | Improved LV systolic function, estimated EF 60%–65%, moderate MR with prolapsed anterior leaflet, trace AR, moderate TR, normal LV longitudinal strain −27%, normal LV and RV size |
| 1-month follow-up | Improved LV systolic function, estimated EF 60%–65%, mild MR, trivial TR, PR and AR |
AR, aortic regurgitation; EF, ejection fraction; LV, left ventricle; MR, mitral regurgitation; MV, mitral valve; RV, right ventricle; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure; TR, tricuspid regurgitation.