Literature DB >> 3418743

Computer-assisted analysis of interlaboratory Ames test variability.

R Benigni1, A Giuliani.   

Abstract

The interlaboratory Ames test variability of the Salmonella/microsome assay was studied by comparing 12 sets of results generated in the frame of the International Program for the Evaluation of Short-Term Tests for Carcinogens (IPESTTC). The strategy for the simultaneous analysis of test performance similarities over the whole range of chemicals involved the use of multivariate data analysis methods. The various sets of Ames test data were contrasted both against each other and against a selection of other IPESTTC tests. These tests were chosen as representing a wide range of different patterns of response to the chemicals. This approach allowed us both to estimate the absolute extent of the interlaboratory variability of the Ames test, and to contrast its range of variability with the overall spread of test responses. Ten of the 12 laboratories showed a high degree of experimental reproducibility; two laboratories generated clearly differentiated results, probably related to differences in the protocol of metabolic activation. The analysis also indicated that assays such as Escherichia coli WP2 and chromosomal aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells generated sets of results within the variability range of Salmonella; in this sense they were not complementary to Salmonella.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3418743     DOI: 10.1080/15287398809531194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health        ISSN: 0098-4108


  4 in total

1.  Transitioning to composite bacterial mutagenicity models in ICH M7 (Q)SAR analyses.

Authors:  Curran Landry; Marlene T Kim; Naomi L Kruhlak; Kevin P Cross; Roustem Saiakhov; Suman Chakravarti; Lidiya Stavitskaya
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 2.  Trust, but Verify II: A Practical Guide to Chemogenomics Data Curation.

Authors:  Denis Fourches; Eugene Muratov; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Using beta binomials to estimate classification uncertainty for ensemble models.

Authors:  Robert D Clark; Wenkel Liang; Adam C Lee; Michael S Lawless; Robert Fraczkiewicz; Marvin Waldman
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 5.514

4.  An ensemble model of QSAR tools for regulatory risk assessment.

Authors:  Prachi Pradeep; Richard J Povinelli; Shannon White; Stephen J Merrill
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.514

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.