Stephanie A Richard1, Benjamin J J McCormick1, Laura E Murray-Kolb2, Pascal Bessong3, Sanjaya K Shrestha4, Estomih Mduma5, Tahmeed Ahmed6, Gagandeep Kang7, Gwenyth O Lee8, Jessica C Seidman1, Erling Svensen9, Margaret N Kosek10, Laura E Caulfield11. 1. Fogarty International Center/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. 3. University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa. 4. Walter Reed, Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS) Research Unit, Nepal, (WARUN), Kathmandu, Nepal. 5. Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Haydom, Manyara, Tanzania. 6. icddr,b, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 7. Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 8. The Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Room W2041, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. 9. Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. 10. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. 11. The Johns Hopkins University, 615 North Wolfe Street, Room W2041, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. lcaulfi1@jhu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poor growth in early childhood has been considered irreversible after 2-3 years of age and has been associated with morbidity and mortality over the short-term and with poor economic and cognitive outcomes over the long-term. The MAL-ED cohort study was performed in eight low-income settings with the goal of evaluating relationships between the child's environment and experience (dietary, illness, and pathogen exposure, among others) and their growth and development. The goal of this analysis is to determine whether there are differences in the factors associated with growth from 24 to 60 months using two different metrics. METHODS: Across six MAL-ED sites, 942 children had anthropometry data at 24 and 60 months, as well as information about socioeconomic status, maternal height, gut permeability (lactulose-mannitol z-score (LMZ)), dietary intake from 9 to 24 months, and micronutrient status. Anthropometric changes were in height- or weight-for-age z-score (HAZ, WAZ), their absolute difference from the growth standard median (HAD (cm), WAD (kg)), as well as recovery from stunting/underweight. Outcomes were modeled using multivariate regression. RESULTS: At 24 months, almost half of the cohort was stunted (45%) and 21% were underweight. Among those who were stunted at 24 months (n = 426), 185 (43%) were no longer stunted at 60 months. Most children increased their HAZ from 24 to 60 months (81%), whereas fewer (33%) had positive changes in their HAD. Linear regression models indicate that girls improved less than boys from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.21 (95% CI -0.27, -0.15); HAD: -0.75 (-1.07, -0.43)). Greater intestinal permeability (higher LMZ) at 0-24 months was associated with lower relative and absolute changes from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.10 (-0.16, -0.04); HAD: -0.47 (-0.73, -0.21)). Maternal height (per 10 cm) was positively associated with changes (HAZ: 0.09 (0.03, 0.15); HAD: 0.45 (0.15, 0.75)). Similar relationships were identified for changes in WAZ and WAD. CONCLUSIONS: The study children demonstrated improved growth from 24 to 60 months of age, but only a subset had positive changes in HAD and WAD. The same environmental factors were associated with growth from 24 to 60 months regardless of metric used (change in HAZ or HAD, or WAZ and WAD).
BACKGROUND: Poor growth in early childhood has been considered irreversible after 2-3 years of age and has been associated with morbidity and mortality over the short-term and with poor economic and cognitive outcomes over the long-term. The MAL-ED cohort study was performed in eight low-income settings with the goal of evaluating relationships between the child's environment and experience (dietary, illness, and pathogen exposure, among others) and their growth and development. The goal of this analysis is to determine whether there are differences in the factors associated with growth from 24 to 60 months using two different metrics. METHODS: Across six MAL-ED sites, 942 childrenhad anthropometry data at 24 and 60 months, as well as information about socioeconomic status, maternal height, gut permeability (lactulose-mannitol z-score (LMZ)), dietary intake from 9 to 24 months, and micronutrient status. Anthropometric changes were in height- or weight-for-age z-score (HAZ, WAZ), their absolute difference from the growth standard median (HAD (cm), WAD (kg)), as well as recovery from stunting/underweight. Outcomes were modeled using multivariate regression. RESULTS: At 24 months, almost half of the cohort was stunted (45%) and 21% were underweight. Among those who were stunted at 24 months (n = 426), 185 (43%) were no longer stunted at 60 months. Most children increased their HAZ from 24 to 60 months (81%), whereas fewer (33%) had positive changes in their HAD. Linear regression models indicate that girls improved less than boys from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.21 (95% CI -0.27, -0.15); HAD: -0.75 (-1.07, -0.43)). Greater intestinal permeability (higher LMZ) at 0-24 months was associated with lower relative and absolute changes from 24 to 60 months (HAZ: -0.10 (-0.16, -0.04); HAD: -0.47 (-0.73, -0.21)). Maternal height (per 10 cm) was positively associated with changes (HAZ: 0.09 (0.03, 0.15); HAD: 0.45 (0.15, 0.75)). Similar relationships were identified for changes in WAZ and WAD. CONCLUSIONS: The study children demonstrated improved growth from 24 to 60 months of age, but only a subset had positive changes in HAD and WAD. The same environmental factors were associated with growth from 24 to 60 months regardless of metric used (change in HAZ or HAD, or WAZ and WAD).
Authors: Robert E Black; Lindsay H Allen; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Laura E Caulfield; Mercedes de Onis; Majid Ezzati; Colin Mathers; Juan Rivera Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-01-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Maureen M Black; Susan P Walker; Lia C H Fernald; Christopher T Andersen; Ann M DiGirolamo; Chunling Lu; Dana C McCoy; Günther Fink; Yusra R Shawar; Jeremy Shiffman; Amanda E Devercelli; Quentin T Wodon; Emily Vargas-Barón; Sally Grantham-McGregor Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sally Grantham-McGregor; Yin Bun Cheung; Santiago Cueto; Paul Glewwe; Linda Richter; Barbara Strupp Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-01-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: John Hoddinott; Jere R Behrman; John A Maluccio; Paul Melgar; Agnes R Quisumbing; Manuel Ramirez-Zea; Aryeh D Stein; Kathryn M Yount; Reynaldo Martorell Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Andrew M Prentice; Kate A Ward; Gail R Goldberg; Landing M Jarjou; Sophie E Moore; Anthony J Fulford; Ann Prentice Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Ibironke Olofin; Christine M McDonald; Majid Ezzati; Seth Flaxman; Robert E Black; Wafaie W Fawzi; Laura E Caulfield; Goodarz Danaei Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cesar G Victora; Linda Adair; Caroline Fall; Pedro C Hallal; Reynaldo Martorell; Linda Richter; Harshpal Singh Sachdev Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-01-26 Impact factor: 79.321