| Literature DB >> 34186174 |
Michiel van den Brand1, Jos Rijntjes2, Markus Möbs3, Julia Steinhilber4, Michèle Y van der Klift5, Kim C Heezen5, Leonie I Kroeze2, Tomas Reigl6, Jakub Porc6, Nikos Darzentas7, Jeroen A C W Luijks2, Blanca Scheijen2, Frédéric Davi8, Hesham ElDaly9, Hongxiang Liu10, Ioannis Anagnostopoulos3, Michael Hummel3, Falko Fend4, Anton W Langerak5, Patricia J T A Groenen2.
Abstract
Ig gene (IG) clonality analysis has an important role in the distinction of benign and malignant B-cell lymphoid proliferations and is mostly performed with the conventional EuroClonality/BIOMED-2 multiplex PCR protocol and GeneScan fragment size analysis. Recently, the EuroClonality-NGS Working Group developed a method for next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based IG clonality analysis. Herein, we report the results of an international multicenter biological validation of this novel method compared with the gold standard EuroClonality/BIOMED-2 protocol, based on 209 specimens of reactive and neoplastic lymphoproliferations. NGS-based IG clonality analysis showed a high interlaboratory concordance (99%) and high concordance with conventional clonality analysis (98%) for the molecular conclusion. Detailed analysis of the individual IG heavy chain and kappa light chain targets showed that NGS-based clonality analysis was more often able to detect a clonal rearrangement or yield an interpretable result. NGS-based and conventional clonality analysis detected a clone in 96% and 95% of B-cell neoplasms, respectively, and all but one of the reactive cases were scored polyclonal. We conclude that NGS-based IG clonality analysis performs comparable to conventional clonality analysis. We provide critical parameters for interpretation and discuss a first step toward a quantitative scoring approach for NGS clonality results. Considering the advantages of NGS-based clonality analysis, including its high sensitivity and possibilities for accurate clonal comparison, this supports implementation in diagnostic practice.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34186174 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.06.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Diagn ISSN: 1525-1578 Impact factor: 5.568