Centaine L Snoswell1,2,3, Hannah Stringer1,2, Monica L Taylor1,2, Liam J Caffery1,2, Anthony C Smith1,2,4. 1. Centre for Online Health, 1974The University of Queensland, Australia. 2. Centre for Health Services Research, 1974The University of Queensland, Australia. 3. Pharmacy Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Australia. 4. Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Telehealth is recognised as a viable way of providing health care over distance, and an effective way to increase access for individuals with transport difficulties or those living in rural and remote areas. While telehealth has many positives for patients, clinicians and the health system, it is important that changes in the delivery of health care (e.g. in-person to telehealth) do not result in inferior or unsafe care. In this review, we collate existing meta-analyses of mortality rates to provide a holistic view of the current evidence regarding telehealth safety. METHODS: In November 2020, a search of Pretty Darn Quick Evidence portal was conducted in order to locate systematic reviews published between 2010 and 2019, examining and meta-analysing the effect of telehealth interventions on mortality compared to usual care. RESULTS: This review summarises evidence from 24 meta-analyses. Five overarching medical disciplines were represented (cardiovascular, neurology, pulmonary, obstetrics and intensive care). Overall, telehealth did not increase mortality rates. DISCUSSION: The evidence from this review can be used by decision makers, in conjunction with other disease-specific and health economic evidences, to support and guide telehealth implementation plans.
INTRODUCTION: Telehealth is recognised as a viable way of providing health care over distance, and an effective way to increase access for individuals with transport difficulties or those living in rural and remote areas. While telehealth has many positives for patients, clinicians and the health system, it is important that changes in the delivery of health care (e.g. in-person to telehealth) do not result in inferior or unsafe care. In this review, we collate existing meta-analyses of mortality rates to provide a holistic view of the current evidence regarding telehealth safety. METHODS: In November 2020, a search of Pretty Darn Quick Evidence portal was conducted in order to locate systematic reviews published between 2010 and 2019, examining and meta-analysing the effect of telehealth interventions on mortality compared to usual care. RESULTS: This review summarises evidence from 24 meta-analyses. Five overarching medical disciplines were represented (cardiovascular, neurology, pulmonary, obstetrics and intensive care). Overall, telehealth did not increase mortality rates. DISCUSSION: The evidence from this review can be used by decision makers, in conjunction with other disease-specific and health economic evidences, to support and guide telehealth implementation plans.
Entities:
Keywords:
Telehealth; digital health; meta-analysis; mortality; outcomes; systematic review; telemedicine; virtual health
Authors: Katherine Z Xie; Luis A Antezana; Andrew J Bowen; Linda X Yin; Sarah Yeakel; Ashley Nassiri; Eric J Moore Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2022-06-06 Impact factor: 6.344
Authors: Andrés Calvache-Mateo; Laura López-López; Alejandro Heredia-Ciuró; Javier Martín-Núñez; Janet Rodríguez-Torres; Araceli Ortiz-Rubio; Marie Carmen Valenza Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ta Wei Kevin Kok; Si Jack Chong; Wen Kien Joachim Yau; Praveen Raj Kumar; Swee Boon Raymond Chua Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 6.344
Authors: Kimberly D Williams; Claudine T Jurkovitz; Mia A Papas; Ann Kathryn Muther; Sharon L Anderson; Tammy L Anderson Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-08-30