Literature DB >> 34183971

Efficacy of PCR Analysis of Mip, Doth and Gspd Genes with Culture in Detection of Legionella pneumophila.

Hamid Bagheri1, Azad Khaledi2, Ghader Ghanizadeh3, Davoud Esmaeili1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34183971      PMCID: PMC8223580          DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Public Health        ISSN: 2251-6085            Impact factor:   1.429


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor-in-Chief

Legionella microorganism is ubiquitous and found worldwide naturally in rivers, streams, springs of hot water, swimming pools, tanks, water piping networks, cooling tower and conditioning systems (1). This bacterium causes sporadic and epidemic cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in healthy and immunocompromised from hospital or community settings (2). Studies showed that 3% to 8% of all CAP are possibly caused by Legionella spp. where 85% of those caused by L. pneumophila (3). Two independent clinical diseases caused by Legionella species include; legionellosis that is a severe form of pneumonia and another one is Pontiac fever; a self-limiting flu-like disease (4). We aimed to investigate the efficacy of PCR analysis of mip, dotH and gspD genes with culture in the detection of L. pneumophila. In this cross-sectional study during 2016, 100 samples (50 of clinical samples and 50 samples from hospital water) were collected. Detection and identification of Legionella isolates was performed using microbiological methods and biochemical tests. Samples treated with a solution of N HCL-KCL2 and then incubated in 56 °C for 12 min. Then, DNA of them was extracted. And PCR technique was performed for the detection of genes. To design primers of selected genes, all genome sequences were identified in the genome databases, then assembled and analyzed, and primers designed with Gene Runner software after design, selected primers were blasted by BLast N to compare the sequence of primers with existing GenBank records. The primers sequences were as follows; F-t4ss:5′-GTGTGGTGTAGGCTGGTTTG-3′, R-t4ss: 5′-CTAACCCAGAAGTGCCGATT-3′, F-mip: 5′-AAAGGCATGCAAGACGCTAT-3′; R-mip: 5′-GTATCCGATTTTCCGGGTTT-3, F-16srRNA: 5′-AGGGTTGATAGGTTAAGAGC-3′, R-16srRNA: 5′-CCAACAGCTAGTTGACATCG-3′; F-t2ss: 5′- GGGCATTAGTGGCCTTAGAA-3′, R-t2ss: 5′CTCCACGAGGTGACGATATG-3′. Then data statistically analyzed using SPSS (Chicago, IL, USA) software trough Chi-square test. Based on the results of culture, 14(14%) isolates of Legionella were recovered from clinical and water samples. PCR results showed 64(64%) out of 100 samples were positive for each of mip and dotH genes. Of these 64 positive samples for dotH genes (24 and 40 cases belonged to the clinical and water samples, respectively). Among the 64 samples were positive for mip gene, 42 and 22 cases belonged to the water and clinical samples, respectively (Fig. 1). Furthermore, 53(53%) of samples were positive for the gspD gene, of which 23(43.4%) of samples were from clinical and remaining from water samples.
Fig. 1:

A)PCR image of mip gene of Legionella spp., on the 1% gel electrophoresis. Line M: Marker 50 bp, line 1: It corresponds to positive control, line 2: It is related with negative control and line 3, 4 and 5: Product size 242 bp of mip gene in tested samples. B)PCR image of dotH and gspD genes of Legionella spp., on the 1% gel electrophoresis. Line1: Marker 50 bp, well 2: Positive control for gspD gene, well 3: environmental sample for gspD gene, well 4: negative control, well 5: Clinical specimen for gspD gene, well 6: positive control for dotH gene and wells 7 and 8: Environmental samples for the dotH gene

A)PCR image of mip gene of Legionella spp., on the 1% gel electrophoresis. Line M: Marker 50 bp, line 1: It corresponds to positive control, line 2: It is related with negative control and line 3, 4 and 5: Product size 242 bp of mip gene in tested samples. B)PCR image of dotH and gspD genes of Legionella spp., on the 1% gel electrophoresis. Line1: Marker 50 bp, well 2: Positive control for gspD gene, well 3: environmental sample for gspD gene, well 4: negative control, well 5: Clinical specimen for gspD gene, well 6: positive control for dotH gene and wells 7 and 8: Environmental samples for the dotH gene There were some limitations to separate Legionella from samples by culture include; a long incubation period and Legionella growth is overshadowed by fast-growing organisms (5), as well as presence of living Legionella that doesn’t have the power to grow on the media, so, all species of Legionella are not detectable by culture (6). Therefore, it is imperative that despite the importance and high sensitivity of culture in isolation of this organism, in addition to the culture, PCR technique can be also used to detecting this bacterium. For the first time in this study dotH and gspD genes was used alongside with mip gene by PCR technique for diagnosis of Legionella, and according to the obtained findings, sensitivity rate of two genes was comparable, so can use of them as promising genes in rapid detection of Legionella from different samples. Results showed the prevalence of three genes; mip, dotH and gspD is high using PCR, so can use of these genes in PCR as a rapid detection method accompanying with culture for diagnosis of Legionella.
  6 in total

Review 1.  Assessing risk of health care-acquired Legionnaires' disease from environmental sampling: the limits of using a strict percent positivity approach.

Authors:  Joseph G Allen; Theodore A Myatt; David L Macintosh; Jerry F Ludwig; Taeko Minegishi; James H Stewart; Bryan F Connors; Michael P Grant; John F McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.918

Review 2.  Could it be Legionella?

Authors:  Jonathan Darby; Kirsty Buising
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10

Review 3.  Legionella urinary antigen testing: potential impact on diagnosis and antibiotic therapy.

Authors:  A D Kashuba; C H Ballow
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 4.  Legionella and community-acquired pneumonia: a review of current diagnostic tests from a clinician's viewpoint.

Authors:  G W Waterer; V S Baselski; R G Wunderink
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Evaluation of the prevalence of Legionella pneumophila in Iranian clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Azad Khaledi; Seyed-Alireza Esmaeili; Hossein Vazini; Pezhman Karami; Afsane Bahrami; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Prevalence of Legionella Species in Water Resources of Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Azad Khaledi; Afsane Bahrami; Edris Nabizadeh; Yousef Amini; Davoud Esmaeili
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2018-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.