Saber Azami-Aghdash1, Fatemeh Pournaghi-Azar1, Ahmad Moosavi2, Mohammad Mohseni3, Naser Derakhshani4, Riaz Alaei Kalajahi5. 1. Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine (RCEBM), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. 2. Department of Health and Community Medicine, Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, Iran. 3. Child Growth and Development Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. 4. Health Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Of the most important implications and complaints in the elderly group of the population, is oral and dental health problems. This study aimed to assess oral health- related quality of life in older people. METHODS: To data collection, databases were searched including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, SID, MagIran, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and scholar google The keywords were "older adults", "Geriatric" Elderly", "Older", "Aged", "Ageing", "Oral health", "Oral hygiene" and "Quality of life", "QOL. For manual searching, several specialized journals of related scope as well as the finalized articles' reference list were searched. Studies from 1st Jan 2000 to 30th Jan 2017 were included. Studies were subjected to meta-analysis to calculate indexes, using CMA:2 (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis) software. RESULTS: Totally, 3707 articles were searched that 48 of them were subjected to the oral and dental health-related quality of life in 59 groups of the elderly population with the mean age of 73.57+6.62 in the 26 countries. The obtained percentage values of dental and oral health were 80.2% (0-60), 14.8% (0-12), 16.4% (0-70), 22% (0-14 or 0-59) and 19.2% (0-196) for GOHAI with the additive method, GOHAI with Simple Count Method, OHIP-14 with the additive method, OHIP-14 with Simple Count method and OHIP-49 with additive method indexes, respectively. CONCLUSION: The elderly group of the population had no proper oral health-related quality of life. Regarding the importance and necessity of oral and dental health and its effect on general health care in the target group, it is recommended to improve dental hygiene in the mentioned group of population.
BACKGROUND: Of the most important implications and complaints in the elderly group of the population, is oral and dental health problems. This study aimed to assess oral health- related quality of life in older people. METHODS: To data collection, databases were searched including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, SID, MagIran, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and scholar google The keywords were "older adults", "Geriatric" Elderly", "Older", "Aged", "Ageing", "Oral health", "Oral hygiene" and "Quality of life", "QOL. For manual searching, several specialized journals of related scope as well as the finalized articles' reference list were searched. Studies from 1st Jan 2000 to 30th Jan 2017 were included. Studies were subjected to meta-analysis to calculate indexes, using CMA:2 (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis) software. RESULTS: Totally, 3707 articles were searched that 48 of them were subjected to the oral and dental health-related quality of life in 59 groups of the elderly population with the mean age of 73.57+6.62 in the 26 countries. The obtained percentage values of dental and oral health were 80.2% (0-60), 14.8% (0-12), 16.4% (0-70), 22% (0-14 or 0-59) and 19.2% (0-196) for GOHAI with the additive method, GOHAI with Simple Count Method, OHIP-14 with the additive method, OHIP-14 with Simple Count method and OHIP-49 with additive method indexes, respectively. CONCLUSION: The elderly group of the population had no proper oral health-related quality of life. Regarding the importance and necessity of oral and dental health and its effect on general health care in the target group, it is recommended to improve dental hygiene in the mentioned group of population.
Regarding the reported statistics particularly in middles and low-income countries, the population aging will become a fundamental concern during the future years (1, 2). Currently, the population aged 60+ are comprising more than 600 million of the world population. In 2020 this value will reach over 1 billion and in 2050 to 2 billion (3, 4).The old aging people are more vulnerable to many complications in particular chronic diseases (5, 6). The oral and dental disorders are one of the most prevalent implications and complaints in this group of the population (7–9). Overall, the general health in the human body gives rise to the appropriate oral and dental health (10, 11). Tooth decay and periodontal complications are considered as the most well-known diseases (12–14). The instability of daily patterns and changing lifestyles have caused these diseases to increase. Over 90% of the human population is suffering from these complications and more than 50 h are wasted due to the complexities of these diseases (15). Changes in the dental health status of elderly individuals affect the nutritional requirements, food intake patterns, and ultimately physical conditions. On the other hand, it can influence one individual’s appearance, self-esteem, and psychological-social functions and the quality of life in elderly people (16–21). Therefore, the quality of life in this age group is of paramount importance (22–24).The quality of life is a multidimensional, mental and complex concept that harbors all aspects of life, in other words, a unique individual understanding, and a way of expressing a person’s feelings about health or other aspects of life, reviewed through an expression of people’s beliefs and using standard tools (25–31).In recent years, many investigations have been conducted on the quality of life associated with dental and oral health (32–35). However, these studies have examined the quality of elderly living in a confined area including smaller sample size. Based on these documents, they have no adequate information to make a clear decision and an ordainment of policies. The systematic conclusion of the results can provide the necessary information for solving these deficiencies on a broad scale. Hence, the aim of this study is a systematic review of the quality of life associated with oral and dental health and involved factors in elderly individuals.
Methods
The current systematic and meta-analysis review was conducted in 2017 following the book entitled “A Systematic Review to support evidence-Based Medline” (36).- All studies including (Descriptive-analytical, cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort had been subjected.- Interventional studies, under 60 years-investigated articles, less than 10 sample size researches, and presented articles in the congresses were excluded.
Information sources
Searching the required information sources was done through the google scholar, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, SID, MagIran and Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases with the keywords “older adults”, “Geriatric” Elderly”, “Older”, “Aged”, “Ageing”, “Oral health”, “Oral hygiene” and “Quality of life”, QOL from 1st Jan 2000 to 30th Jan 2017. For manual searching, several specialized journals of related scope as well as the finalized articles. There was also contact with dentistry experts. To collect non-published sources (Grey Literature) European Association for Grey Literature Exploitation (EAGLE) and Health care Management Information Consortium (HMIC) were searched (Table 1).
Table 1:
Complete search strategy for PubMed databases
Search
Recent queries in PubMed
Item found
#1
(“quality of life”) OR “QOL”[Title/Abstract]
258248
#2
(“oral health”[Title/Abstract]) OR “oral hygiene”[Title/Abstract]
34411
#3
((((“elderly”[Title/Abstract]) OR “ageing”[Title/Abstract]) OR “older”[Title/Abstract]) OR “older adults”[Title/Abstract]) OR “aged” [Title/Abstract]
1052735
#4
#1 AND #2 AND #3
682*
Filters activated: Publication date from 2000/01/01 to 2017/04/31, Humans, English.
Complete search strategy for PubMed databasesFilters activated: Publication date from 2000/01/01 to 2017/04/31, Humans, English.
Review Process
Firstly, the titles of reviewed articles that were not consistent with the study objectives were excluded. In the next step, the abstract and full texts were reviewed and identified articles that did not comprise the inclusion criteria and poorly integrated with the research were retracted. The data extraction form was designed manually in word software. Thereafter, the 5 articles’ data were extracted empirically, and defeats in the initial form were resolved.The included items were authors, year of study, country, sample size, statistical population, the mean age of participants, the average of life quality, instrument type, collection of data, and score calculations. All process was carried out by two authors and dispute cases were referred to the third person.
Reporting Quality Assessment
Reporting quality of included articles was evaluated by two assessors through strengthening the Reporting of observational studies Epidemiology (STROBE) (37) checklist. Disagreements between them were referred to as the third person. This checklist was selected because of its specificity for the evaluation of observational studies and its validity and translation to the Persian for assessing articles in the study (38). It was included 22 items (39, 40).
Data Analysis
Studies were subjected to meta-analysis to calculate indexes, using CMA:2 (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis) software. To report results, it was applied to the Forest plot diagrams in where the size of each square indicates the sample size and drawn lines of each side represent the confidence interval about 95% for each study. For results, heterogeneity assaying Q statistics and I2 index were used. In this study, over 50% of I2 would be the heterogeneity scale of articles.
GOHAI
General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) as a 12 items-questionnaire evaluates the life quality associated with oral and dental hygiene. It assays the three dimensions: functional, psychological, and discomfort. To compute GOHAI scores two methods include the additive (ADD) and simple count (SC) were used. Additive scores for GOHAI had obtained through the adding answer scores for 12 items after encoding reversed. To score the items Likert scale was applied in which it has considered always=5, often=3, sometimes=2, rarely=1, and never=0. Consequently, the GOHAI scale is calculated from 0–60. The higher scores indicate the improved life quality associated with oral and dental health. To score with GOHAI for simple count method by counting the case numbers it has used the answers such as sometimes, rather often, rarely or never. The scores are variable from 0–12 for GOHAI (33, 41, 42).
OHIP-14
To calculate OHIP-14 scores, two methods include the additive (ADD) and simple count (SC) were applied. Additive scores for OHIP-14 had obtained through the adding 14 items scores. For scoring the items Likert scale had been used as well. In this instrument always=5, often=4, quietly=3, sometimes=2, rarely=1, and never=0. Consequently, the OHIP-14 scale from 0–70 including higher scores is indicating the quality of life associated with oral and dental health. To score with simple count method in OHIP-14 by counting the case numbers it has used the answers such as sometimes, rather often, rarely or never. In this method, score ranges have been evaluated from 0–14 or between 0–56 (42, 43).
OHIP-49
The OHIP-49 questionnaire includes 7 dimensions such as functional constraints, physical pain, psychological discomfort, and social, physical and psychological disabilities, and 49 items to assay. For item scoring Likert scale had been applied (0=never, quietly always=1, sometimes=2, rather often =3, and many=4). In OHIP-49 the 0 score indicates the high level of life quality associated with oral and dental hygiene and the high score represents an implication in this area. The scores were obtained by only adding the answers points (44, 45). To calculate the average of life quality associated with oral and dental health in older people, regarding the various instruments obtained scores from studies were adjusted. To unify how to the calculation of score ranges it was considered from 0–100 and the mean scores of life quality in older individuals were computed from 0–100.
Results
Overall, 3707 articles were searched that 1837 of them were removed because of common sources and 1817 cases in the title and abstract assessment. In full-text evaluation, 13 cases were retracted as well. Finally, 40 articles were included (Fig. 1) (Appendix 1: Not published but is ready in case of requesting by readers) (46–80), in which information about the life quality of 55 groups of older individuals in 24 countries was reported. Nineteen groups were evaluated in community, 3 groups in nursing homes, and 33 groups in health care centers. Overall, the life quality of 22416 older participants had been assessed with the mean age of 73.57± 6.62.
Fig. 1:
Searches and inclusion process
The study results are based on the used tools for assaying the life quality associated with oral and dental hygiene in older individuals in 5 sections.Searches and inclusion process
GOHAI with the Additive Method
Total average of life quality in the elderly group is 80.2 [77.2–83.3 95%CI Q=11341.1 df=24 I2=97.7 P<0.001], in health care centers 79.3 [72.5–86 95%CI Q=9367 df=15 I2=98.5 P<0.001], in the home/society 83 [79.1–86.9 95%CI Q=968.7 df=6 I2=98.7 P<0.001], and in nursing homes 72.6 [65.7–79.6 95%CI Q=17.9 df=1 I2=91.3 P<0.001] (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2:
Quality of Life associated with oral and dental hygiene using General (formerly Geriatric) Oral Health Assessment Index with the additive methods.
Quality of Life associated with oral and dental hygiene using General (formerly Geriatric) Oral Health Assessment Index with the additive methods.
GOHAI with Simple Count Method
The total average of life quality associated with oral and dental hygiene in the elderly group is 14.8 [9.6–20 95%CI Q=306.6 df=4 I2=94.6 P<0.001] (43).
OHIP-14 with the Additive Method
The total average of life quality associated with oral and dental hygiene in the elderly group is 16.2 [8.7–24.1 95%CI Q=1904.9 df=6 I2=96.8 P<0.001], total average of life quality in health care centers 16.3 [7.3–25.3 95%CI Q=127.3 df=3 I2=94.5 P<0.001], in-home/society 16.8 [2.1–31.5 95%CI Q=177.7 df=2 I2=97.7 P<0.001] (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3:
Quality of life associated with oral and dental hygiene using Oral Health Impact Profile-14 with the additive method
Quality of life associated with oral and dental hygiene using Oral Health Impact Profile-14 with the additive method
OHIP-14 with Simple Count Method
The total average of life quality associated with oral and dental hygiene in the elderly group is 22.2 [16–28.4 95%CI Q=527.2 df=6 I2=94.8 P<0.001].
OHIP-49 with the Additive Method
Results indicated that the total average of life quality associated with oral and dental hygiene in the elderly group is 19.2 [13.5–24.9 95%CI Q=125.6 df=3 I2=92.8 P<0.001] (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4:
Quality of Life associated with oral and dental hygiene using OHIP-49 with the additive method
Quality of Life associated with oral and dental hygiene using OHIP-49 with the additive method
Discussion
In the present study, 3707 articles were searched and 48 cases of them were included. The evaluation of life quality of 22416 participants was reported through the 5 instruments in health care centers, homes, and society. In GOHAI with additive method-investigations that surveyed the life quality associated with oral and dental health, the total average in elderly individuals was 80.2% followed by 14.8% in GOHAI with simple count method, 16.4% in OHIP-14 with the additive method, 22.2% in OHIP-14 with simple count method, and 19.2% with OHIP-49 with the additive method.The results pertinent to OHIP-14 with a simple count method were following Baker et al. results (2006) with 22.47% in England (81). The majority of findings in Canada (82) and the United States (83–85) indicated the low quality of life associated with oral and dental hygiene in older people. The mouth cancer, tooth decaying, incidence of periodontal infections, and loss of teeth gives rise to improper hygiene (86, 87). Regarding the importance of oral and dental hygiene promoting the WHO recommends taking some measures in countries (88, 89). Of the most significant general preventative measures, daily and primary care of teeth such as brushing and plaque control in elderly patients, no alcohol abuse, assessment of health care, and a 6-month checkup are in utmost importance (90–92).General health and life quality of elderly people are extensively affected by the oral and dental hygiene (93–96). The probability of oral and dental implications in this age group is deeply regarded (97). The elderly individuals were believed that their improper general health gives rise to the low dental and oral hygiene (98). Despite the mentioned points and other complications, elderly people dedicate lower priority to their oral and dental hygiene which influences the life quality and general health matter (55). It is also probable low expectations of oral and dental health in the low and middle income-countries which increase the reports rate of complexities related to life quality, therefore, it is important to be more cautious about dental implications (97). One of the elderly peoples’ misconceptions is no necessity to have the tooth, so they have no pay attention to oral hygiene. It influences their life quality. On the other hand, health officials concentrate their potencies on the children, young people, and adolescents and most of the health priorities have been implemented on them. These false conceptions are declining factors for elderly individuals’ health and their life quality.Life quality percentage in nursing homes was 72.6%, and in health care centers with a marginally increase in a value of 79.3%, in the homes/society it had the highest rate in comparison with other groups in a value of 83%. In nursing homes due to the low awareness about health, dentistry visiting has taken only in emergency cases. Moreover, the high mental problems and melancholia cause to pay no proper attention to efficient hygiene. However, elderly people in homes and society have a better condition because their relatives take preventative and treatment measures. Other reasons for low-total scores of life quality associated with oral and dental hygiene are considered as the lack of motivation and no strong social relationship in the nursing homes. The individuals in the unfamiliar and no social relationship condition have a lower score of life quality associated with oral and dental health compared to other groups (32).Additionally, the inability to access health services in nursing homes particularly in low and middle-income countries as well as non-referral to dentists is of most major factors to have a direct negative impact on the quality of life associated with oral and dental hygiene (84, 99). Educating elderly individuals in nursing homes about oral and dental health and increase their awareness is a positive and constructive action to reduce detrimental consequences (99, 100). Moreover, the establishment of a suitable background and easy access to health services promote the life quality in this age group of population.The life quality associated with oral and dental hygiene in health care centers was 79.3%, marginally lower than 83% pertinent to the home/society elderly individuals. The low hygiene level of patients in health care centers to receive services is considered as the main cause of this statement besides the oral ulcers and abscess (51). Some reasons like the relationship with family members have a direct impact on the higher quality of life in the home/society elderly individuals. However, the mentioned percentage is not completely acceptable and has the potency to be higher. One of the strategies that are defined to reduce the effects of oral and dental infections consequences is preventative measures in extended periods including daily oral and dental hygiene and its continuous assessment (88, 90–92).The findings of the current study state that, there is no identical tool for assessing the quality of life associated with oral and dental health in elderly individuals and each instrument calculates the scores with a different distribution. To improve the evaluation method, it is necessary to design an identical instrument with the unit instructions. For localizing the short and long forms of instruments, it is suggested to follow the unit instructions for each country. Moreover, the authors are not permitted to modify its content with different perspectives.
Limitations
The limitations of the current study were the existence of a variety of instruments with different methods of calculation. It persuaded the authors to divide the articles into several categories which led to a high dispersion rate and low power of findings. Moreover, some of the articles written to other languages were excluded from the study because of unfamiliarity to authors.
Conclusion
Oral health related to life quality in older people has not appropriate level. Therefore, as a result of poor oral and dental hygiene levels in this age group besides the other complications, it is crucial to increase the attention to dental care and the explicit support of countries’ health systems in all aspects of health. Given the importance of dental hygiene, it is necessary to provide health services related to dentistry according to the health policies of countries in service packages.
Ethical considerations
Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.
Authors: Sergio Sánchez-García; Erika Heredia-Ponce; Teresa Juárez-Cedillo; Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Claudia Espinel-Bermúdez; Javier de la Fuente-Hernández; Carmen García-Peña Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.821
Authors: Vittorio Dibello; Frank Lobbezoo; Madia Lozupone; Rodolfo Sardone; Andrea Ballini; Giuseppe Berardino; Anita Mollica; Hélio José Coelho-Júnior; Giovanni De Pergola; Roberta Stallone; Antonio Dibello; Antonio Daniele; Massimo Petruzzi; Filippo Santarcangelo; Vincenzo Solfrizzi; Daniele Manfredini; Francesco Panza Journal: Geroscience Date: 2022-10-15 Impact factor: 7.581