| Literature DB >> 34183780 |
Byung-Sik Cho1,2, Gi-June Min1,2, Sung-Soo Park1,2, Silvia Park1,2, Young-Woo Jeon3, Seung-Hwan Shin4, Seung-Ah Yahng5, Jae-Ho Yoon1,2, Sung-Eun Lee1,2, Ki-Seong Eom1,2, Yoo-Jin Kim1,2, Seok Lee1,2, Chang-Ki Min1,2, Seok-Goo Cho1, Dong-Wook Kim1,2, Jong Wook Lee1, Myungshin Kim6, Yonggoo Kim6, Hee-Je Kim7,8.
Abstract
Given the controversies in the prognostic value of KIT mutations and optimal thresholds and time points of MRD monitoring for AML with CBFB-MYH11, we retrospectively evaluated 88 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT, n = 60) or autologous HSCT (Auto-HSCT, n = 28). The D816V KIT mutation was significantly associated with post-transplant relapse, contrasting with other types of mutations in KIT. Pre- and post-transplant (3 months after transplant) CBFB-MYH11 MRD assessments were useful in predicting post-transplant relapse and poor survival. The optimal threshold was determined as a 2 log reduction at both time points. In multivariate analysis, the D816V KIT mutation and CBFB-MYH11 MRD assessments were independently associated with post-transplant relapse and survival. Stratification by D816V KIT and pre-transplant CBFB-MYH11 MRD status further distinguished the risk of relapse and survival. Auto-HSCT was superior to Allo-HSCT in MRD negative patients without D816V KIT, while Allo-HSCT trended to be superior to Auto-HSCT in patients with MRD positivity or the D816V KIT mutation. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the differentiated prognostic value of the D816V KIT mutation in AML with CBFB-MYH11 and clarified optimal time points and thresholds for CBFB-MYH11 MRD monitoring in the setting of HSCT.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34183780 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01384-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant ISSN: 0268-3369 Impact factor: 5.483