Literature DB >> 34183708

The risk of shoulder pain after laparoscopic surgery for infertility is higher in thin patients.

Xin You Li1,2, Ming Tian3, Ai Zhi Li3, Chun Lei Han4, Ke Zhong Li5,6.   

Abstract

Postlaparoscopic shoulder pain (PLSP) is a common clinical problem that needs to be addressed by medical professionals who are currently perform laparoscopic surgeries. The purpose of this study was to determine the perioperative clinical factors and demographic characteristics associated with PLSP. A prospective observational study was performed with 442 inpatients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for infertility. The pain visual analogue scale was used as the measuring instrument. To identify the predictors of PLSP, we performed multivariate conditional logistic regression. PLSP was correlated with body mass index (BMI, odds ratio = 0.815). The incidence of shoulder pain and more severe shoulder pain in patients with a lower BMI was significantly higher than it was in patients with a higher BMI, and BMI was significantly negatively correlated with PLSP. Most of the patients (95%) began to experience shoulder pain on the first postoperative day, and it rarely occurred on the day of surgery. Patients with lower BMI presented a higher risk of reporting shoulder pain on the first postoperative day. We should identify high-risk patients in advance and make specific treatment plans according to the characteristics of their symptoms.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34183708     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92762-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  52 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: a double-blind study to evaluate postoperative pain.

Authors:  A Holzer; S T Jirecek; U M Illievich; J Huber; R J Wenzl
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  Laparoscopy: risks, benefits and complications.

Authors:  Diana L Wadlund
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.208

3.  A prospective comparative study of cosmetic satisfaction for three different surgical approaches.

Authors:  Taejong Song; Jin-Young Park; Tae-Joong Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Laparoscopic appendectomy in children: report of 465 cases.

Authors:  J S Valla; B Limonne; V Valla; P Montupet; N Daoud; A Grinda; Y Chavrier
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome.

Authors:  V Mais; S Ajossa; S Guerriero; M Mascia; E Solla; G B Melis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison.

Authors:  Hong-Bo Wei; Jiang-Long Huang; Zong-Heng Zheng; Bo Wei; Feng Zheng; Wan-Shou Qiu; Wei-Ping Guo; Tu-Feng Chen; Tian-Bao Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Pain and pulmonary function following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized study.

Authors:  M Ellström; M F Olsén; J H Olsson; G Nordberg; A Bengtsson; M Hahlin
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Operative laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of ectopic pregnancy: a prospective trial.

Authors:  A A Murphy; C W Nager; J J Wujek; L M Kettel; V A Torp; H G Chin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: between evidence and common sense.

Authors:  Ernst Eypasch; Stefan Sauerland; Rolf Lefering; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

10.  A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.

Authors:  A E Ortega; J G Hunter; J H Peters; L L Swanstrom; B Schirmer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.