Literature DB >> 34183469

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Beginners.

Joseph L Mathew1.   

Abstract

Systematic reviews involve the application of scientific methods to reduce bias in review of literature. The key components of a systematic review are a well-defined research question, comprehensive literature search to identify all studies that potentially address the question, systematic assembly of the studies that answer the question, critical appraisal of the methodological quality of the included studies, data extraction and analysis (with and without statistics), and considerations towards applicability of the evidence generated in a systematic review. These key features can be remembered as six 'A'; Ask, Access, Assimilate, Appraise, Analyze and Apply. Meta-analysis is a statistical tool that provides pooled estimates of effect from the data extracted from individual studies in the systematic review. The graphical output of meta-analysis is a forest plot which provides information on individual studies and the pooled effect. Systematic reviews of literature can be undertaken for all types of questions, and all types of study designs. This article highlights the key features of systematic reviews, and is designed to help readers understand and interpret them. It can also help to serve as a beginner's guide for both users and producers of systematic reviews and to appreciate some of the methodological issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34183469      PMCID: PMC9065227     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-6061            Impact factor:   3.839


  13 in total

1.  Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Duval; R Tweedie
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Publication Bias: The Elephant in the Review.

Authors:  Jarrod E Dalton; Shari D Bolen; Edward J Mascha
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions.

Authors:  D J Cook; C D Mulrow; R B Haynes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Authors:  M Egger; G Davey Smith; M Schneider; C Minder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

5.  RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Jelena Savović; Matthew J Page; Roy G Elbers; Natalie S Blencowe; Isabelle Boutron; Christopher J Cates; Hung-Yuan Cheng; Mark S Corbett; Sandra M Eldridge; Jonathan R Emberson; Miguel A Hernán; Sally Hopewell; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Daniela R Junqueira; Peter Jüni; Jamie J Kirkham; Toby Lasserson; Tianjing Li; Alexandra McAleenan; Barnaby C Reeves; Sasha Shepperd; Ian Shrier; Lesley A Stewart; Kate Tilling; Ian R White; Penny F Whiting; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-08-28

Review 6.  Research Techniques Made Simple: Assessing Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Aaron M Drucker; Patrick Fleming; An-Wen Chan
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Alison Cooke; Debbie Smith; Andrew Booth
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2012-07-24

8.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.

Authors:  Jonathan Ac Sterne; Miguel A Hernán; Barnaby C Reeves; Jelena Savović; Nancy D Berkman; Meera Viswanathan; David Henry; Douglas G Altman; Mohammed T Ansari; Isabelle Boutron; James R Carpenter; An-Wen Chan; Rachel Churchill; Jonathan J Deeks; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Jamie Kirkham; Peter Jüni; Yoon K Loke; Theresa D Pigott; Craig R Ramsay; Deborah Regidor; Hannah R Rothstein; Lakhbir Sandhu; Pasqualina L Santaguida; Holger J Schünemann; Beverly Shea; Ian Shrier; Peter Tugwell; Lucy Turner; Jeffrey C Valentine; Hugh Waddington; Elizabeth Waters; George A Wells; Penny F Whiting; Julian Pt Higgins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-10-12

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies.

Authors:  Carlijn R Hooijmans; Maroeska M Rovers; Rob B M de Vries; Marlies Leenaars; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Miranda W Langendam
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.