BACKGROUND: This is the first study to examine the costs of conducting a mobile phone survey (MPS) through interactive voice response (IVR) to collect information on risk factors for noncommunicable diseases (NCD) in three low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); Bangladesh, Colombia, and Uganda. METHODS: This is a micro-costing study conducted from the perspective of the payer/funder with a 1-year horizon. The study evaluates the fixed costs and variable costs of implementing one nationally representative MPS for NCD risk factors of the adult population. In this costing study, we estimated the sample size of calls required to achieve a population-representative survey and associated incentives. Cost inputs were obtained from direct economic costs incurred by a central study team, from country-specific collaborators, and from platform developers who participated in the deployment of these MPS during 2017. Costs were reported in US dollars (USD). A sensitivity analysis was conducted assessing different scenarios of pricing and incentive strategies. Also, costs were calculated for a survey deployed targeting only adults younger than 45 years. RESULTS: We estimated the fixed costs ranging between $47,000 USD and $74,000 USD. Variable costs were found to be between $32,000 USD and $129,000 USD per nationally representative survey. The main cost driver was the number of calls required to meet the sample size, and its variability largely depends on the extent of mobile phone coverage and access in the country. Therefore, a larger number of calls were estimated to survey specific harder-to-reach sub-populations. CONCLUSION: Mobile phone surveys have the potential to be a relatively less expensive and timely method of collecting survey information than face-to-face surveys, allowing decision-makers to deploy survey-based monitoring or evaluation programs more frequently than it would be possible having only face-to-face contact. The main driver of variable costs is survey time, and most of the variability across countries is attributable to the sampling differences associated to reaching out to population subgroups with low mobile phone ownership or access.
BACKGROUND: This is the first study to examine the costs of conducting a mobile phone survey (MPS) through interactive voice response (IVR) to collect information on risk factors for noncommunicable diseases (NCD) in three low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); Bangladesh, Colombia, and Uganda. METHODS: This is a micro-costing study conducted from the perspective of the payer/funder with a 1-year horizon. The study evaluates the fixed costs and variable costs of implementing one nationally representative MPS for NCD risk factors of the adult population. In this costing study, we estimated the sample size of calls required to achieve a population-representative survey and associated incentives. Cost inputs were obtained from direct economic costs incurred by a central study team, from country-specific collaborators, and from platform developers who participated in the deployment of these MPS during 2017. Costs were reported in US dollars (USD). A sensitivity analysis was conducted assessing different scenarios of pricing and incentive strategies. Also, costs were calculated for a survey deployed targeting only adults younger than 45 years. RESULTS: We estimated the fixed costs ranging between $47,000 USD and $74,000 USD. Variable costs were found to be between $32,000 USD and $129,000 USD per nationally representative survey. The main cost driver was the number of calls required to meet the sample size, and its variability largely depends on the extent of mobile phone coverage and access in the country. Therefore, a larger number of calls were estimated to survey specific harder-to-reach sub-populations. CONCLUSION: Mobile phone surveys have the potential to be a relatively less expensive and timely method of collecting survey information than face-to-face surveys, allowing decision-makers to deploy survey-based monitoring or evaluation programs more frequently than it would be possible having only face-to-face contact. The main driver of variable costs is survey time, and most of the variability across countries is attributable to the sampling differences associated to reaching out to population subgroups with low mobile phone ownership or access.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cost study; Mobile phone surveys; Noncommunicable chronic diseases; Surveillance
Authors: James C Mundt; David J Katzelnick; Sidney H Kennedy; Beata S Eisfeld; Beverley B Bouffard; John H Greist Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2005-06-24 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: George W Pariyo; Adaeze C Wosu; Dustin G Gibson; Alain B Labrique; Joseph Ali; Adnan A Hyder Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Dustin G Gibson; Brooke A Farrenkopf; Amanda Pereira; Alain B Labrique; George William Pariyo Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Alain Labrique; Emily Blynn; Saifuddin Ahmed; Dustin Gibson; George Pariyo; Adnan A Hyder Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: George W Pariyo; Abigail R Greenleaf; Dustin G Gibson; Joseph Ali; Hannah Selig; Alain B Labrique; Gulam Muhammed Al Kibria; Iqbal Ansary Khan; Honorati Masanja; Meerjady Sabrina Flora; Saifuddin Ahmed; Adnan A Hyder Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: C I Sartorao Filho; C I Sartorao Neto; A L V Sartorao; D C Terribile; R Mello; B B Mello; M C Zoqui; D O Duarte; L E G Cachoni; V C Q Bisseto; E A C Ribeiro Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.730