Alan Taylor1, Firas Mourad2,3,4, Roger Kerry1, Nathan Hutting5. 1. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Sport Rehabilitation, University of Nottingham, UK. 2. Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Department of Clinical Science and Translation Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy. 3. Department of Physiotherapy, LUNEX International University of Health, Exercise and Sports, Differdange, Luxembourg. 4. Department of Physiotherapy, Poliambulatorio Physio Power, Brescia, Italy. 5. Department of Occupation and Health, School of Organisation and Development, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neurological examination in musculoskeletal practice is a key element of safe and appropriate orthopedic clinical practice. With physiotherapists currently positioning themselves as advanced first line practitioners, it is essential that those who treat patients who present with neck/head/orofacial pain and associated symptoms, should have an index of suspicion of cranial nerve (CN) dysfunction. They should be able to examine and determine if CN dysfunction is present, and make appropriate clinical decisions based upon those findings. METHODS: This paper summarizes the functions, potential impairments of the nerves, associated conditions, and basic skills involved in cranial nerve examination. RESULTS: A summary of cranial nerve examination is provided, which is based on the function of the nerves, This is intended to facilitate clinicians to feel more confident at understanding neural function/impairment, as well as performing and interpreting the examination. CONCLUSION: This paper illustrates that CN testing can be performed quickly, efficiently and without the need for complicated or potentially unavailable equipment. An understanding of the CN's function and potential reasons for impairment is likely to increase the frequency of CN testing in orthopedic clinical practice and referral if positive findings are encountered.
BACKGROUND: Neurological examination in musculoskeletal practice is a key element of safe and appropriate orthopedic clinical practice. With physiotherapists currently positioning themselves as advanced first line practitioners, it is essential that those who treat patients who present with neck/head/orofacial pain and associated symptoms, should have an index of suspicion of cranial nerve (CN) dysfunction. They should be able to examine and determine if CN dysfunction is present, and make appropriate clinical decisions based upon those findings. METHODS: This paper summarizes the functions, potential impairments of the nerves, associated conditions, and basic skills involved in cranial nerve examination. RESULTS: A summary of cranial nerve examination is provided, which is based on the function of the nerves, This is intended to facilitate clinicians to feel more confident at understanding neural function/impairment, as well as performing and interpreting the examination. CONCLUSION: This paper illustrates that CN testing can be performed quickly, efficiently and without the need for complicated or potentially unavailable equipment. An understanding of the CN's function and potential reasons for impairment is likely to increase the frequency of CN testing in orthopedic clinical practice and referral if positive findings are encountered.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cranial nerves; examination; impairment; musculoskeletal practice
Authors: Mari Kalland Knapstad; Stein Helge Glad Nordahl; Jan Sture Skouen; Tove Ask; Frederik Kragerud Goplen Journal: Physiother Res Int Date: 2019-12-08
Authors: H A Kranenburg; M A Schmitt; E J Puentedura; G J Luijckx; C P van der Schans Journal: Musculoskelet Sci Pract Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Lukas Mayer; Christian Boehme; Thomas Toell; Benjamin Dejakum; Johann Willeit; Christoph Schmidauer; Klaus Berek; Christian Siedentopf; Elke Ruth Gizewski; Gudrun Ratzinger; Stefan Kiechl; Michael Knoflach Journal: J Stroke Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 6.967
Authors: Rungthip Puntumetakul; Thiwaphon Chatprem; Pongsatorn Saiklang; Supaporn Phadungkit; Worawan Kamruecha; Surachai Sae-Jung Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-17 Impact factor: 4.614