Michael J Bannon1, Allyson R Lapansie2, Alaina M Jaster2, Manal H Saad2, Jayna Lenders2, Carl J Schmidt3. 1. Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 540 E Canfield St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. Electronic address: mbannon@med.wayne.edu. 2. Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 540 E Canfield St, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, 2800 Plymouth Rd, Bldg. 35, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA; Wayne County Medical Examiner's Office, 1300 E Warren Ave, Detroit, MI, 48207, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A high proportion of opioid drug deaths involve concurrent benzodiazepine use. To reduce the risk of drug overdose, various prescription drug monitoring programs have been implemented. This study examined the impact of concurrent benzodiazepine use on opioid-related deaths, and the utility of the Michigan Automated Prescription System (MAPS) in predicting risk of opioid death. METHODS: Wayne County Medical Examiner's Office cases from 2018 were examined in terms of MAPS data and MAPS-derived drug risk scores, as well as postmortem toxicology. Opioid death cases with concurrent benzodiazepine use were compared to non-drug deaths. RESULTS: For cases with a MAPS history for 6 months preceding death, the incidence of opioid prescriptions filled did not differ between groups. In contrast, significantly more opioid death cases had filled a benzodiazepine prescription; alprazolam prescription was the single best predictor of opioid drug death. Groups differed in MAPS-calculated drug risk scores, though these were less predictive of opioid death than some individual measures of prescription drug use. In terms of postmortem toxicology, fentanyl was the best discriminator between cohorts, with significant associations seen for morphine, benzodiazepine, or cocaine use. Similar results were obtained in the subset of subjects filling a prescription within a month of death, except that MAPS risk scores no longer predicted drug deaths. CONCLUSION: MAPS scores did not adequately predict risk of opioid-related death. Contrary to expectations, prescription opioid use was not correlated with opioid-related death, whereas concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines represented a highly significant risk factor.
BACKGROUND: A high proportion of opioid drug deaths involve concurrent benzodiazepine use. To reduce the risk of drug overdose, various prescription drug monitoring programs have been implemented. This study examined the impact of concurrent benzodiazepine use on opioid-related deaths, and the utility of the Michigan Automated Prescription System (MAPS) in predicting risk of opioid death. METHODS: Wayne County Medical Examiner's Office cases from 2018 were examined in terms of MAPS data and MAPS-derived drug risk scores, as well as postmortem toxicology. Opioid death cases with concurrent benzodiazepine use were compared to non-drug deaths. RESULTS: For cases with a MAPS history for 6 months preceding death, the incidence of opioid prescriptions filled did not differ between groups. In contrast, significantly more opioid death cases had filled a benzodiazepine prescription; alprazolam prescription was the single best predictor of opioid drug death. Groups differed in MAPS-calculated drug risk scores, though these were less predictive of opioid death than some individual measures of prescription drug use. In terms of postmortem toxicology, fentanyl was the best discriminator between cohorts, with significant associations seen for morphine, benzodiazepine, or cocaine use. Similar results were obtained in the subset of subjects filling a prescription within a month of death, except that MAPS risk scores no longer predicted drug deaths. CONCLUSION: MAPS scores did not adequately predict risk of opioid-related death. Contrary to expectations, prescription opioid use was not correlated with opioid-related death, whereas concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines represented a highly significant risk factor.
Authors: Andrew Kolodny; David T Courtwright; Catherine S Hwang; Peter Kreiner; John L Eadie; Thomas W Clark; G Caleb Alexander Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Leah LaRue; Robert K Twillman; Eric Dawson; Penn Whitley; Melissa A Frasco; Angela Huskey; Maria G Guevara Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-04-05
Authors: Manal H Saad; Candace L Savonen; Matthew Rumschlag; Sokol V Todi; Carl J Schmidt; Michael J Bannon Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: John Macleod; Colin Steer; Kate Tilling; Rosie Cornish; John Marsden; Tim Millar; John Strang; Matthew Hickman Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Gerd Jakobsson; Sara Gustavsson; Anna K Jönsson; Johan Ahlner; Henrik Gréen; Robert Kronstrand Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 2.441