Literature DB >> 34182002

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry.

Carola Fleischmann1, Andreas Probst1, Alanna Ebigbo1, Siegbert Faiss2, Brigitte Schumacher3, H-P Allgaier4, F L Dumoulin5, Ingo Steinbrueck6, Michael Anzinger7, Joerg Marienhagen8, Anna Muzalyova9, Helmut Messmann10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables the curative resection of early malignant lesions and is associated with reduced recurrence risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive ESD data in the West, the German ESD registry was set up to evaluate relevant outcomes of ESD.
METHODS: The German ESD registry is a prospective uncontrolled multicenter study. During a 35-month period, 20 centers included 1000 ESDs of neoplastic lesions. The results were evaluated in terms of en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rate after a 3-month and 12-month follow-up. Additionally, participating centers were grouped into low-volume (≤20 ESDs/y), middle-volume (20-50/y), and high-volume centers (>50/y). A multivariate analysis investigating risk factors for noncurative resection was performed.
RESULTS: Overall, en bloc, R0, and curative resection rates of 92.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.94), 78.8% (95% CI, 0.76-0.81), and 72.3% (95% CI, 0.69-0.75) were achieved, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.067-0.102), whereas the recurrence rate after 12 months was 2.1%. High-volume centers had significantly higher en bloc, R0, curative resection rates, and recurrence rates and lower complication rates than middle- or low-volume centers. The lesion size, hybrid ESD, age, stage T1b carcinoma, and treatment outside high-volume centers were identified as risk factors for noncurative ESD.
CONCLUSION: In Germany, ESD achieves excellent en bloc resection rates but only modest curative resection rates. ESD requires a high level of expertise, and results vary significantly depending on the center's yearly case volume.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case Volume; Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection; Europe; Germany; Registry

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34182002     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.06.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  4 in total

1.  Thickness of colorectal submucosal (SM) layer in resected specimens: Is more better?

Authors:  Alanna Ebigbo
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 2.  Management of Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Early Gastric Cancer following Non-Curative Endoscopic Resection.

Authors:  Waku Hatta; Tomoyuki Koike; Kaname Uno; Naoki Asano; Atsushi Masamune
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Comparison between Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Surgery in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Meng Qian; Yuan Sheng; Min Wu; Song Wang; Kaiguang Zhang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Novel single-operator through-the-scope traction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection: Outcomes of a multicenter randomized pilot ex-vivo study in trainees with limited endoscopic submucosal dissection experience (with video).

Authors:  Dennis Yang; Hiroyuki Aihara; Muhammad K Hasan; Cem Simsek; Hafiz Khan; Tony S Brar; Venkata S Gorrepati; Justin J Forde; Kambiz Kadkhodayan; Mustafa A Arain; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2022-10-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.