| Literature DB >> 34181340 |
Lhakit Lepcha1, Manash P Sarma2, Amal C Kataki3, Wankupar Wankhar1, B G Unni2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify potential proteomic salivary biomarker in tamol chewers and comparing it to healthy and Oral squamous cell carcinoma cases.Entities:
Keywords: ANXA4 - Annexin A4; HSP-Heat shock protein; OSCC- Oral squamous cell carcinoma; SCC- squamous cell carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34181340 PMCID: PMC8418859 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1837
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Figure 1Image of 2D Gel Representing. A, Normal control; B, Tamol chewers sample
Figure 2Five Upregulated Protein in Tamol Chewers as Compared with Normal Control. A, Serum albumin; B, Heat shock protein 1; C, Gamma actin; D, squamous cell carcinoma 1; E, ANXA4 while referring with their molecular weight (kDa)
List of Identified Proteins Found Upregulated in Tamol Chewers as Compared with Healthy Individuals
| Spot number | Molecular weight (kDa) | Fold change | Protein name | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 318 | 67 | 2.9 | Serum albumin | Koduru et al.,2017 |
| 266 | 27 | 5.9 | Heat shock protein 27 | Lu et al.,2021 |
| 257 | 41 | 3.8 | Gamma Actin | Sannam et al., 2016 |
| 196 | 45 | 5.2 | Squamous cell carcinoma 1 | Roman et al.,2013 |
| 204 | 34 | 3.8 | ANXA4 | Zimmermann et al., 2004 |
Figure 3Protein Expression of HSP-27. L1: Con; L2: Cancer sample; L3: TC1 (Tamol chewers 1) - 1; L4: TC2 (Tamol chewers 2); L5: TC3 (Tamol chewers 3); L6: TC4 (Tamol chewers 4). Data are expressed as Mean ± SD. “a”- compared to control. “b” - Compared to Tamol chewers. The significance level was fixed at “*” p<0.05; “**” p<0.01; “***” p<0.001 and “****” p<0.0001