Literature DB >> 34181276

Toxicity of pemetrexed during renal impairment explained-Implications for safe treatment.

René J Boosman1, Thomas P C Dorlo1, Nikki de Rouw2,3, Jacobus A Burgers4, Anne-Marie C Dingemans5,6, Michel M van den Heuvel7, Lizza E L Hendriks5, Bonne Biesma8, Joachim G J V Aerts6, Sander Croes9, Ron H J Mathijssen10, Alwin D R Huitema1,11,12, Rob Ter Heine2.   

Abstract

Pemetrexed is an important component of first line treatment in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. However, a limitation is the contraindication in patients with renal impairment due to hematological toxicity. Currently, it is unknown how to safely dose pemetrexed in these patients. The aim of our study was to elucidate the relationship between pemetrexed exposure and toxicity to support the development of a safe dosing regimen in patients with renal impairment. A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis was performed based on phase II study results in three patients with renal dysfunction, supplemented with data from 106 patients in early clinical studies. Findings were externally validated with data of different pemetrexed dosing regimens. Alternative dosing regimens were evaluated using the developed model. We found that pemetrexed toxicity was driven by the time above a toxicity threshold concentration. The threshold for vitamin-supplemented patients was 0.110 mg/mL (95% CI: 0.092-0.146 mg/mL). It was observed that in patients with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]: <45 mL/min) the approved dose of 500 mg/m2 would yield a high probability of severe neutropenia in the range of 51.0% to 92.6%. A pemetrexed dose of 20 mg for patients (eGFR: 20 mL/min) is shown to be neutropenic-equivalent to the approved dose in patients with adequate renal function (eGFR: 90 mL/min), but would result in an approximately 13-fold lower area under the concentration-time curve. The pemetrexed exposure-toxicity relationship is explained by a toxicity threshold and substantially different from previously thought. Without prophylaxis for toxicity, it is unlikely that a therapeutic dose can be safely administered to patients with renal impairment.
© 2021 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  estimated glomerular filtration rate; neutropenia; non-small cell lung cancer; pemetrexed; prophylactic strategies

Year:  2021        PMID: 34181276     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  5 in total

Review 1.  Optimized Dosing: The Next Step in Precision Medicine in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  René J Boosman; Jacobus A Burgers; Egbert F Smit; Neeltje Steeghs; Anthonie J van der Wekken; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema; Rob Ter Heine
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Mechanisms, Management and Prevention of Pemetrexed-Related Toxicity.

Authors:  Nikki de Rouw; Berber Piet; Hieronymus J Derijks; Michel M van den Heuvel; Rob Ter Heine
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  EGFR-targeted pemetrexed therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Liang Yang; Hanghang Fang; Jingjing Jiang; Yongjie Sha; Zhiyuan Zhong; Fenghua Meng
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 5.671

4.  Population pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed in chinese primary advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Peng Cao; Wei Guo; Jun Wang; Sanlan Wu; Yifei Huang; Yang Wang; Yani Liu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.988

5.  The Pharmacoeconomic Benefits of Pemetrexed Dose Individualization in Patients With Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Nikki de Rouw; Merel de Boer; René J Boosman; Michel M van den Heuvel; David M Burger; Joris E Lieverse; Hieronymus J Derijks; Geert W J Frederix; Rob Ter Heine
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 6.903

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.