Literature DB >> 34180567

Learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not been defined: A systematic review.

Elisa Reitano1, Nicola de'Angelis2, Elena Schembari3, Maria Clotilde Carrà4,5, Elisa Francone6, Sergio Gentilli6, Gaetano La Greca3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most performed surgeries worldwide but its learning curve is still unclear.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the 2009 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched the literature in a systematic manner through online databases, including Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. Human studies investigating the learning curve of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies and the GRADE scale were used for the quality assessment of the selected articles.
RESULTS: Nine cohort studies published between 1991 and 2020 were included. All studies showed a great heterogeneity among the considered variables. Seven articles (77.7%) assessed intraoperative variables only, without considering patient's characteristics, operator's experience, and grade of gallbladder inflammation. Only five articles (55%) provided a precise cut-off value to see proficiency in the learning curve, ranging from 13 to 200 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of clear guidelines when evaluating the learning curve in surgery, probably contributed to the divergent data and heterogeneous results among the studies. The development of guidelines for the investigation and reporting of a surgical learning curve would be helpful to obtain more objective and reliable data especially for common operation such as laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
© 2021 The Authors. ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  education; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; laparoscopy; learning curve; training

Year:  2021        PMID: 34180567     DOI: 10.1111/ans.17021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  5 in total

Review 1.  Look beyond the Mirror: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Situs Inversus Totalis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (and Report of New Technique).

Authors:  Octavian Enciu; Elena Adelina Toma; Adrian Tulin; Dragos Eugen Georgescu; Adrian Miron
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Learning by doing: an observational study of the learning curve for ultrasonic fundus-first dissection in elective cholecystectomy.

Authors:  My Blohm; Gabriel Sandblom; Lars Enochsson; Yücel Cengiz; Edmunds Austrums; Elisabeth Abdon; Joakim Hennings; Mats Hedberg; Ulf Gustafsson; Angelica Diaz-Pannes; Johanna Österberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Therapeutic Effect of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on Patients with Cholecystolithiasis Complicated with Chronic Cholecystitis and Postoperative Quality of Life.

Authors:  Jie Song; Jie Chen; Chunyan Lin
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Gallbladder Stones with Chronic Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Leiping Rao; Guoqing Zhou; Yongzhong Gao; Yongchuan Huang; Hongwei He; Qiyun Gu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography enhanced by virtual reality as a novel tool to improve the understanding of biliary anatomy and the teaching of surgical trainees.

Authors:  Sebastian M Staubli; Peter Maloca; Christoph Kuemmerli; Julia Kunz; Amanda S Dirnberger; Andreas Allemann; Julian Gehweiler; Savas Soysal; Raoul Droeser; Silvio Däster; Gabriel Hess; Dimitri Raptis; Otto Kollmar; Markus von Flüe; Martin Bolli; Philippe Cattin
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.